Journal of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 543–572 | Cite as

Multi-attribute mate choice decisions and uncertainty in the decision process: a generalized sequential search strategy

  • Daniel D. Wiegmann
  • Kelly L. Weinersmith
  • Steven M. Seubert


The behavior of females in search of a mate determines the likelihood that high quality males are encountered and adaptive search strategies rely on the effective use of available information on the quality of prospective mates. The sequential search strategy was formulated, like most models of search behavior, on the assumption that females obtain perfect information on the quality of encountered males. In this paper, we modify the strategy to allow for uncertainty of male quality and we determine how the magnitude of this uncertainty and the ability of females to inspect multiple male attributes to reduce uncertainty influence mate choice decisions. In general, searchers are sensitive to search costs and higher costs lower acceptance criteria under all versions of the model. The choosiness of searchers increases with the variability of the quality of prospective mates under conditions of the original model, but under conditions of uncertainty the choosiness of searchers may increase or decrease with the variability of inspected male attributes. The behavioral response depends on the functional relationship between observed male attributes and the fitness return to searchers and on costs associated with the search process. Higher uncertainty often induces searchers to pay more for information and under conditions of uncertainty the fitness return to searchers is never higher than under conditions of the original model. Further studies of the performance of alternative search strategies under conditions of uncertainty may consequently be necessary to identify search strategies likely to be used under natural conditions.


Multi-attribute mate choice Sequential search strategy Uncertainty 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

92B05 91C99 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alatalo RV, Carlson A, Lundberg A (1988) The search cost in mate choice of the pied flycatcher. Anim Behav 36: 289–291. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80272-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backwell PRY, Passmore NL (1996) Time constraints and multiple choice criteria in the sampling behaviour and mate choice of the fiddler crab, Uca annulipes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38: 407–416. doi: 10.1007/s002650050258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bensch S, Hasselquist D (1992) Evidence for active choice in a polygynous warbler. Anim Behav 44: 301–311. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(92)90036-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berglund A (1995) Many mates make male pipefish choosy. Behaviour 132: 213–218. doi: 10.1163/156853995X00702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandt LSE, Ludwar BC, Greenfield MD (2005) Co-occurrence of preference functions and acceptance thresholds in female choice: mate discrimination in the lesser wax moth. Ethology 111: 609–625. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01085.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byers JA, Byers AA, Dunn SJ (2006) A dry summer diminishes mate search effort by pronghorn females: evidence for a significant cost of mate search. Ethology 112: 74–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01127.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 78: 575–595. doi: 10.1017/S1464793103006158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christy JH, Backwell PRY, Goshima S, Kreuter T (2002) Sexual selection for structure building by courting male fiddler crabs: an experimental study of behavioral mechanisms. Behav Ecol 13: 366–374. doi: 10.1093/beheco/13.3.366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins EJ, McNamara JM, Ramsey DM (2006) Learning rules for optimal selection in a varying environment: mate choice revisited. Behav Ecol 17: 799–809. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arl008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dall SRX, Giraldeau L-A, Olsson O, McNamara JM, Stephens DW (2005) Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 187–193. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dale S, Slagsvold T (1996) Mate choice on multiple cues, decision rules and sampling strategies in female pied flycatchers. Behaviour 133: 903–944. doi: 10.1163/156853996X00305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dale S, Amundsen T, Lifjeld JT, Slagsvold T (1990) Mate sampling behavior of female pied flycatchers: evidence for active mate choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27: 87–91. doi: 10.1007/BF00168450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeRivera CE, Backwell PRY, Christy JH, Vehrencamp SL (2003) Density affects female and male searching in the fiddler crab, Uca beebei. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53: 72–83Google Scholar
  14. Downhower JF, Lank DB (1994) Effect of previous experience on mate choice by female mottled sculpins. Anim Behav 47: 369–372. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1994.1050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Draud MJ, Verga JN, Haley MP, Itzkowitz M (2008) Mate inspection patterns in the female beaugregory damselfish (Stegastes leucostictus). Acta Ethol 11: 6–15. doi: 10.1007/s10211-007-0036-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forsgren E (1997) Mate sampling in a population of sand gobies. Anim Behav 53: 267–276. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Getty T (1996) Mate selection by repeated inspection: more on pied flycatchers. Anim Behav 51: 739–745. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibbson RM, Langen T (1996) How do animals choose their mates?. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 468–470. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10050-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gotthard K, Nylin S, Wiklund C (1999) Mating system evolution in response to search costs in the speckled wood butterfly, Pararge aegeria. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45: 424–429. doi: 10.1007/s002650050580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harder J, Russell W (1969) Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Am Econ Rev 56: 25–34Google Scholar
  21. Hedrick AV, Dill LM (1993) Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim Behav 46: 193–196. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hovi M, Ratti O (1994) Mate sampling and assessment procedures in female pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). Ethology 96: 127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7: 107–112. doi: 10.1007/BF00299515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janetos AC, Cole BJ (1981) Imperfectly optimal animals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9: 203–209. doi: 10.1007/BF00302939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 7: 283–327Google Scholar
  26. Lippman SA, McCall JJ (1976) The economics of job search: a survey I. Econ Inq 14: 155–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luttbeg B (1996) A comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice. Behav Ecol 7: 451–460. doi: 10.1093/beheco/7.4.451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luttbeg B (2002) Assessing the robustness and optimality of alternative decision rules with varying assumptions. Anim Behav 63: 805–814. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luttbeg B, Towner MC, Wandesforde-Smith A, Mangel M, Foster S (2001) State-dependent mate-assessment and mate-selection behavior in female threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus, Gasterosteiformes: Gasterosteidae). Ethology 107: 545–558. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00694.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCafferty S (1979) Wage dispersion and job search behavior. J Econ Bus 31: 213–217Google Scholar
  31. McKenna CJ (1979) A solution to a class of sequential decisions problems. Econ Lett 3: 115–118. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(79)90102-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKenna CJ (1985) Uncertainty and the labour market. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyer J (1975) Choice among distributions. J Econ Theory 14: 326–336. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(77)90134-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer J (1977) Second degree stochastic dominance with respect to a function. Int Econ Rev 18: 477–487. doi: 10.2307/2525760 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Milinski M, Bakker TCM (1992) Costs influence sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 250: 229–233. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Real LA (1990) Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am Nat 136: 376–404. doi: 10.1086/285103 Google Scholar
  37. Real LA (1991) Search theory and mate choice. II. Mutual interaction, assortative mating, and equilibrium variation in male and female fitness. Am Nat 138: 901–917. doi: 10.1086/285259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenqvist G, Houde A (1997) Prior exposure to male phenotypes influences mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behav Ecol 8: 194–198. doi: 10.1093/beheco/8.2.194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wagner WE Jr, Smeds MR, Wiegmann DD (2001) Experience affects female response to male song in the variable field cricket. Ethology 107: 769–776. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00700.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wiegmann DD, Angenloni LM (2007) Mate choice and uncertainty in the decision process. J Theor Biol 249: 654–666. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.08.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiegmann DD, Morris M (2005) Search behavior and mate choice. Recent Adv Exp Theor Biol 1: 201–216Google Scholar
  42. Wiegmann DD, Real LA, Capone TA, Ellner S (1996) Some distinguishing features of models of search behavior and mate choice. Am Nat 147: 188–204. doi: 10.1086/285846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wong BBM, Jennions MD (2003) Costs influence male mate choice in a freshwater fish. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270(Suppl): S36–S38. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel D. Wiegmann
    • 1
  • Kelly L. Weinersmith
    • 2
  • Steven M. Seubert
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences and J. P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind and BehaviorBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science and PolicyUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations