Skip to main content
Log in

Ephaptic coupling of cardiac cells through the junctional electric potential

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cardiac cells are electrically coupled through gap junction channels, which allow ionic current to spread intercellularly from one cell to the next. In addition, it is possible that cardiac cells are coupled through the electric potential in the junctional cleft space between neighboring cells. We develop and analyze a mathematical model of two cells coupled through a common junctional cleft potential. Consistent with more detailed models, we find that the coupling mechanism is highly parameter dependent. Analysis of our model reveals that there are two time scales involved, and the dynamics of the slow subsystem provide new mathematical insight into how the coupling mechanism works. We find that there are two distinct types of propagation failure and we are able to characterize parameter space into regions of propagation success and the two different types of propagation failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beauchamp P., Choby C., Desplantez T., de Peyer K., Green K., Yamada K.A., Weingart R., Saffitz J.E. and Kleber A.G. (2004). Electrical propagation in synthetic ventricular myocyte strands from germline Connexin43 knockout mice. Circ. Res. 95: 170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beeler G.W. and Reuter H.J. (1977). Reconstruction of the action potential of ventricular myocardial fibers. J. Physiol. 268: 177–210

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen S.A. (1996). Immunocytochemical localization of rH1 sodium channel in adult rat heart atria and ventricle. Circulation 94: 3083–3086

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eloff B.C., Lerner D.L., Yamada K.A., Schuessler R.B., Saffitz J.E. and Rosenbaum D.S. (2001). High resolution optical mapping reveals conduction slowing in Connexin43 deficient mice. Cardiovasc. Res. 51: 681–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fast V.G. and Kleber A.G. (1993). Microscopic conduction in cultured strands of neonatal rat heart cells measured with voltage sensitive dyes. Circ. Res. 73: 914–925

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guerrero P., Schuessler R.B., Davis L.M., Beyer E.C., Johnson C.M., Yamada K.A. and Saffitz J.E. (1997). Slow ventricular conduction in mice heterozygous for a Connexin43 null mutation. J. Clin. Invest. 99(8): 1991–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kucera J.P., Rohr S. and Rudy Y. (2002). Localization of sodium channels in intercalated disks modulates cardiac conductiion. Circ. Res. 91: 1176–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo C.H. and Rudy Y. (1994). A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential, I: Simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes. Circ. Res. 74: 1071–1096

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maier S.K.G., Westenbroek R.E., Schenkman K.A., Feigl E.O., Scheuer T. and Catterall W.A. (2002). An unexpected role for brain-type sodium channels in coupling of cell surface depolarization to contraction in the heart. PNAS 99(6): 4073–4078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McKean H.P. (1970). Nagumo’s equation. Adv. Math. 4: 209–223

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell C.C. and Schaeffer D.G. (2003). A two-current model for the dynamics of cardiac membrane. Bull. Math. Biol. 65: 767–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mori, Y.: A three-dimensional model of cellular activity. Ph.D Thesis, New York University (2006)

  13. Morley G.E., Vaidya D., Samie F.H., Lo C., Delmar M. and Jalife J. (1999). Characterization of conduction in the ventricles of normal and heterozygous Cx43 knockout mice using optical mapping. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 10(10): 1361–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Picone J.B., Sperelakis N. and Mann J.E. (1991). Expanded model of the electric field hypothesis for propagation in cardiac muscle. Math. Comput. Model. 15(8): 17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spach M.S. (2003). Transition from a continuous to discontinuous understanding of cardiac conduction. Circ. Res. 92: 125–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sperelakis N., Hoshiko T., Berne R.M. and Keller R.F. (1960). Intracellular and external recordings from frog ventricular fibers during hypertonic perfusion. Am. J. Physiol. 198: 135–140

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sperelakis, N., McConnell, K.: Electric field interactions between closely abutting excitable cells. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 77–89 (2002) (January/February)

  18. Thomas S.A., Schuessler R.B., Berul C.I., Beardslee M.A., Beyer E.C., Mendelsohm M.E. and Saffitz J.E. (1998). Disparate effects of deficient expression of Connexin43 on atrial and ventricular conduction: Evidence for chamber-specific molecular determinants of conduction. Circulation 97: 686–691

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas S.P., Kucera J.P., Bircher-Lehmann L., Rudy Y., Saffitz J.E. and Kleber A.G. (2003). Impulse propagation in synthetic strands of neonatal cardiac myocytes with genetically reduced levels of Connexin43. Circ. Res. 92: 1209–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaidya D., Tamaddon H.S., Lo C.W., Taffet S.M., Delmar M., Morley G.E. and Jalife J. (2001). Null mutation of Connexin43 causes slow propagation of ventricular activation in the late stages of mouse embryonic development. Circ. Res. 88: 1196–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yeager M. (1998). Structure of cardiac gap junction intercellular channels. J. Struct. Biol. 121: 231–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth D. Copene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Copene, E.D., Keener, J.P. Ephaptic coupling of cardiac cells through the junctional electric potential. J. Math. Biol. 57, 265–284 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0157-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0157-3

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation