Skip to main content
Log in

Group size determined by fusion and fission A mathematical modelling with inclusive fitness

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a mathematical model for the group size determination by the intra-reactions, self-growth, ostracism and fission within a group, and by the inter-reactions, immigration and fusion between two groups. In some group reactions, a conflict between two groups occurs about the reaction to change the group size. We construct a mathematical model to consider such conflict, taking into account the inclusive fitness of members in each group. In the conflict about the fusion between two groups, our analysis shows that the smaller group wants to fuse, while the larger does not. Also the criterion to resolve the conflict is discussed, and some numerical examples are given, too. It is concluded that, depending on the deviation in the total cost paid for the conflict by counterparts, the group reactions could result in a terminal group size different from that reached only by a sequence of outsider's immigrations into a group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alden Smith, E.: The application of optimal foraging theory to the analysis of hunter-gatherer group size. In: Winterhalder B, Alden Smith E, (eds.) Hunter-gatherer Foraging Strategies. pp 36–65 Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1981

  2. Alden Smith, E.: Inuit foraging groups: some simple models incorporating conflicts of interest, relatedness, and central-place sharing. Ethol. Sociobiol. 6, 27–47 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York, 1984

  4. Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D.: The evolution of cooperation. Science 211, 1390–1396 (1981)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Beecham, J.A., Farnsworth, K.D.: Animal group forces resulting from predator avoidance and competiton minimization. J. theor. Biol. 198, 533–548 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caraco, T., Wolf, L.L.: Ecological determinants of group sizes of foraging lioss. Am. Nat. 109, 343–352 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, C.W., Mangel, M.: Foraging and flocking strategies: information in an uncertain environment. Am. Nat. 123, 626–641 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Flierl, G., Grünbaum, D., Levin, S., Olson, D.: From individuals to aggregations: the interplay between behavior and physics. J. theor. Biol. 196, 397–454 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Giraldeau, L.A.: The stable group and the determinants of group sizes in foraging group size. In: Slobodchikoff CN, (ed.) The ecology of social behavior. pp 33–53. Academic Press, New York, 1988

  10. Giraldeau, L.A., Caraco, T.: Genetic relatedness and group size in an aggregation economy. Evol. Ecol. 7, 429–438 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giraldeau, L.A., Caraco, T.: Social foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000

  12. Gueron, S.: The steady-state distributions of coagulation-fragmentation processes. J. Math. Biol. 37, 1–27 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gueron, S., Levin, S.A.: The dynamics of group formation. Math. Biosci. 128, 243–264 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gueron, S., Levin, S.A., Rubenstein, D.I.: The dynamics of herds: From individuals to aggregations. J. theor. Biol. 182, 85–98 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamilton, W.D.: The evolution of social behavior. J. theor. Biol. 7, 1–52 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Higashi, M., Yamamura, N.: What determines animal group size: insider-outsider conflict and its resolution. Am. Nat. 142, 553–563 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Houston, A., Clark, C., McNamara, J., Mangel, M.: Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology. Nature 332, 29–34 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Humphries, S., Ruxton, G.D., Metcalfe, N.B.: Group size and relative competitive ability: geometric progressions as a conceptual tool. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47, 113–118 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krebs, J.R., Davies, N.B.: An introduction to behavioral ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1981

  20. Levin, S.A.: Grouping in population models. In: Mollison D et al., (ed.) Epidemic models: their structure and relation to data, pp. 271–278. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995

  21. Mangel, M., Clark, C.W.: Dynamic modeling in behavioural ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1988

  22. Martinez, F.A., Marschall, E.A.: A dynamic model of group-size choice in the coral reef fish Dascyllus albisella. Behav. Ecol. 10, 572–577 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maynard Smith, J.: The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts. J. theor. Biol. 47, 209–221 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maynard Smith, J.: The problems of biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986

  25. Packer, C., Scheel, D., Pusey, A.E.: Why lions form groups: food is not enough. Am. Nat. 136, 1–19 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parrish, J.K., Hamner, W.M. (eds.): Animal groups in three dimensions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

  27. Rodman, P.S.: Inclusive fitness and group size with a reconsideration of group sizes in lions and wolves. Am. Nat. 118, 275–283 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seger, J.: Opportunities and pitfalls in co-operative reproduction. In: Keller L, (ed.) Queen numbers and sociality in insects, pp 1–15. Oxford Scientific Publisher, Oxford, 1993

  29. Sibly, R.M.: Optimal group size is unstable. Anim. Behav. 31, 947–948 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson, E.O.: Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1975

  31. Yamamura, N., Higashi, M.: An evolutionary theory of conflict resolution between relatives: altruism, manipulation, compromise. Evolution 46, 1236–1239 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Seno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seno, H. Group size determined by fusion and fission A mathematical modelling with inclusive fitness. J. Math. Biol. 52, 70–92 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-005-0341-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-005-0341-7

Key words or phrases

Navigation