Abstract
Bacillus ciccensis and Cytobacillus solani were reported to belong to separate genomic species based on a polyphasic taxonomic approach. However, we found that type strains of B. ciccensis and C. solani should belong to the same genomic species based on the clustering patterns resulting from genome phylogenetic analysis. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between the genomes of two type strains were 99.6% and 96.9%, respectively, much higher than 95 ~ 96% and 70% cut-off point proposed and generally accepted species boundary. This result was also supported by a comprehensive comparison of phenotypic characteristics between the two type strains. These results suggested that B. ciccensis and C. solani had the same taxonomic position. Consequently, we propose that B. ciccensis is a later heterotypic synonym of C. solani.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cohn F (1872) Untersuchung über bakterien. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 1:127–224
Liu B, Liu GH, Sengonca C, Schumann P, Ge CB, Wang JP, Cui WD, Lin NQ (2015) Bacillussolani sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of a potato field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65(11):4066–4071
Liu Y, Li NN, Eom MK, Schumann P, Zhang X, Cao YH, Ge YY, Xiao M, Zhao JR, Cheng C, Kim SG (2017) Bacillusciccensis sp. nov., isolated from maize (Zeamays L.) seeds. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67(11):4606–4611
Patel S, Gupta RS (2020) A phylogenomic and comparative genomic framework for resolving the polyphyly of the genus Bacillus: proposal for six new genera of Bacillusspecies, peribacillus gen. nov., cytobacillus gen. nov., mesobacillus gen. nov., neobacillus gen. nov., metabacillus gen. nov. and alkalihalobacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70(1):406–438
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M (2019) TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10(1):2182
Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O (2015) FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 32(10):2798–2800
Richter M, RossellóMóra R, Glöckner FO, Peplies J (2015) JspeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32(6):681–931
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M (2013) Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14(1):60
Jensen A, Scholz CFP, Kilian M (2016) Re-evaluation of the taxonomy of the mitis group of the genus Streptococcus based on whole genome phylogenetic analyses, and proposed reclassification of Streptococcus dentisani asStreptococcus oralissubsp. dentisani comb. nov., Streptococcus tigurinus as Streptococcus oralis subsp. tigurinus comb. nov., and Streptococcus oligofermentans as a later synonym of Streptococcus cristatus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66(11):4803–4820
Rodriguez-R LM, Gunturu S, Harvey WT, Rosselló-Mora R, Tiedje JM, Cole JR, Konstantinidis KT (2018) The microbial genomes atlas (MiGA) webserver: taxonomic and gene diversity analysis of Archaea and Bacteria at the whole genome level. Nucleic Acids Res 46(W1):W282–W288
Deloger M, El Karoui M, Petit MA (2009) A genomic distance based on MUM indicates discontinuity between most bacterial species and genera. J Bacteriol 191(1):91–99
Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, Rooney AP, Yi H, Xu XW, Meyer SD, Trujillo ME (2018) Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68(1):461–466
Tamura T, Matsuzawa T, Oji S, Ichikawa N, Hosoyama A, Katsumata H, Yamazoe A, Hamada M, Suzuki KI, Gonoi T, Fujita N (2012) A genome sequence-based approach to taxonomy of the genus Nocardia. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 102(3):481–491
Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM (1994) Taxonomic note: a place for DNA–DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 44(4):846–849
Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R (2009) Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(45):19126–19131
Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM (2019) International code of nomenclature of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69(1A):S1–S111
Farris JS (1972) Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 106(951):645–667
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the key scientific research foundation of department of education of Hunan Province, China (No.17A072).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Yihui Guo and Siren Hu equally contributed to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Y., Hu, S., Li, K. et al. Proposal of Bacillus ciccensis Liu et al. as a Later Heterotypic Synonym of Cytobacillus solani (Liu et al.) Patel and Gupta Using Comparative Genomic Analysis. Curr Microbiol 78, 843–847 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02307-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02307-6