Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring Probiotic Activity of Lactobacillus sp. Isolated from Indigenous Breeds of Cattle Milk and Fecal Samples in Bhatan Village, MH., IN

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Probiotics are defined as live organisms that are able to confer health benefits to the host by improving their intestinal microbial balance. In the last decade, there has been an increasing interest to reveal health benefits associated with them. The objective of this study was to isolate indigenous probiotic organisms and assess their probiotic activity and therapeutic characteristics. The isolates were identified as Lactobacillus fermentum (isolates 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9), Lactobacillus salivarius (isolate 13), and Lactobacillus plantarum (isolates 32 and 36). Five isolates showed growth at pH 2.5, while all isolates could grow at pH 8.5. All isolates showed good growth upto 5% NaCl concentration while two isolates showed growth in 7% NaCl concentration. All the isolates were susceptible to most of the broad-spectrum antibiotics. Cell-free suspensions from the isolates showed antimicrobial activity against the tested strains of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, and Staphylococcus aureus. Two of the isolates 32 and 36 showed good revival after long-term storage, without any change in the morphology. Hence among all the other isolates these two isolates could have a good marketable potential. These strains can further be formulated into a probiotic drink that can be used as a health supplement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siadati SA, Ebrahimnezhad Y, Salehi Jouzani G, Shayegh J (2017) Evaluation of probiotic potential of some native lactobacillus strains on the growth performance and serum biochemical parameters of Japanese quails (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica) during rearing period. Braz J Poult Sci 19(3):399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson G, Merenstein D, Pot B, Morelli L, Canani R, Flint H, Salminen S, Calder P, Sanders M (2014) The International Scientific Association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(8):506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Helland MH, Wicklund T, Narvhus JA (2004) Growth and metabolism of selected strains of probiotic bacteria in maize porridge with added malted barley. Int J Food Microbiol 91:305–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anas M, Ahmed K, Mebrouk K (2014) Study of the antimicrobial and probiotic Effect of Lactobacillus Plantarum isolated from raw goat's milk from the region of Western Algeria. Int J Sci: Basic Appl Res 13(7):18–27

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mojgani N, Hussaini F, Vaseji N (2015) Characterization of indigenous Lactobacillus strains for probiotic properties. Jundishapur J Microbiol 8(2):e17523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salminen S, Isolauri E, Salminen E (1996) Clinical uses of probiotics for stabilizing the gut mucosal barrier: successful strains and future challenges. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek Van Leeuwenhoek 70(2–4):347–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Balcázar JL, Rojas-Luna T (2007) Inhibitory activity of probiotic Bacillus subtilis UTM 126 against vibrio species confers protection against vibriosis in juvenile shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Curr Microbiol 55(5):409–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dharmawan J, Surono I, Kun L (2005) Adhesion properties of indigenous dadih lactic acid bacteria on human intestinal mucosal surface. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 19(5):751–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salminen S, von Wright A, Morelli L, Marteau P, Brassart D, de Vos WM, Fondén R, Saxelin M, Collins K, Mogensen G, Birkeland SE, Mattila-Sandholm T (1998) Demonstration of safety of probiotics—a review. Int J Food Microbiol 44(1–2):93–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanders ME, Huis J (1999) Bringing a probiotic-containing functional food to the market: microbiological, product, regulatory and labeling issues. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek Van Leeuwenhoek 76:293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rathore M, Sharma K (2017) Lipolytic Lactobacillus Species from Camel Milk. Microbiol Res J Int 22(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Raja B, Arunachalam K (2011) Market potential for probiotic nutritional supplements in India. Afr J Bus Manage 5(14):5418–5423

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maheshwari R, Rani B, Verma D, Yadav KR (2012) Indigenous Probiotics & Health Benefits. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 2(1):83–86

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coeuret V, Dubernet S, Bernardeau M, Gueguen M, Vernoux J (2003) Isolation, characterisation and identification of Lactobacilli focusing mainly on cheeses and other dairy products. Le Lait 83(4):269–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shehata MG, El Sohaimy SA, Malak A, El-Sahn YMM (2016) Screening of isolated potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria for cholesterol lowering property and bile salt hydrolase activity. Ann Agric Sci 61(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehrmann MA, Kurzak P, Bauer J, Vogel RF (2002) Characterization of Lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J Appl Microbiol 92(5):966–975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chakraborty A, Bhowal J (2015) Isolation, identification and analysis of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus spp. from selected regional dairy product. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4(6):621–628

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yadav R, Puniya A, Shukla P (2016) Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum RYPR1 from an indigenous fermented beverage raabadi. Front Microbiol 7:1683

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Klare I, Konstabel C, Müller-Bertling S, Reissbrodt R, Huys G, Vancanneyt M (2005) Evaluation of new broth media for microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing of Lactobacilli, Pediococci, Lactococci, and Bifidobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8982–8986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pundir KR, Rana S, Kashyap N, Kaur A (2013) Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from food samples: an in vitro study. J Appl Pharm Sci 3(3):85–93

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sawatari Y, Yokota A (2007) Diversity and mechanisms of alkali tolerance in Lactobacilli. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(12):3909–3915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van de Guchte M, Serror P, Chervaux C, Smokvina T, Ehrlich S, Maguin E (2002) Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 82:187–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Angelis M, Gobbetti M (2004) Environmental stress responses in Lactobacillus: a review. Proteomics 4:106–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Menconi A, Morgan JM, Pumford RN, Hargis MB, Tellez G (2013) Physiological properties and Salmonella growth inhibition of probiotic Bacillus strains isolated from environmental and poultry sources. Int J Bacteriol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/958408

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kong F, Singh RP (2008) Disintegration of solid foods in human stomach. J Food Sci 73:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chowdhury A, Hossain N, Mostazir J, Fakruddin Billah M, Ahmed MM (2012) Screening of Lactobacillus spp. from buffalo yoghurt for probiotic and antibacterial activity. J Bacteriol Parasitol 3(8):156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Adnan AFM, Tan IKP (2007) Isolation of lactic acid bacteria from Malaysian foods and assessment of the isolates for industrial potential. Bioresour Technol 98:1380–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Olejnik A, Lewandowska M, Obarska M, Grajek W (2005) Tolerance of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains to low pH, bile salts and digestive enzymes. Electro J Polish Agric Univers 8:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gilliland SE, Speck ML (1977) Deconjugation of bile acids by intestinal lactobacilli. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:15–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sahadeva R, Leong S, Chua K, Tan C, Chan H, Tong E, Wong S, Chan H (2011) Survival of commercial probiotic strains to pH and bile. Int Food Res J 18(4):1515–1522

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bove P, Russo P, Capozzi V, Gallone A, Spano G, Fiocco D (2013) Lactobacillus plantarum passage through an oro-gastro-intestinal tract simulator: Carrier matrix effect and transcriptional analysis of genes associated to stress and probiosis. Microbiol Res 168:351–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Courvalin P (2006) Antibiotic resistance: the pros and cons of probiotics. Dig Liver Dis 38:S261–S265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hammad A, Shimamoto T (2010) Towards a compatible probiotic-antibiotic combination therapy: assessment of antimicrobial resistance in the Japanese probiotics. J Appl Microbiol 109(4):1349–1360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharma P, Tomar SK, Goswami P, Sangwan V, Singh R (2014) Antibiotic resistance among commercially available probiotics. Food Res Int 57:176–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Georgieva R, Yocheva L, Tserovska L, Zhelezova G, Stefanova N, Atanasova A, Danguleva A, Ivanova G, Karapetkov N, Rumyan N, Karaivanova E (2015) Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp. intended for use as starter and probiotic cultures. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 29(1):84–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wong S, Jamous A, O’Driscoll J, Sekhar R, Saif M, O’Driscoll S, Lewis H, McKeown E, Hirani PS (2015) Effectiveness of probiotic in preventing and treating antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and/or clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in patients with spinal cord injury: a protocol of systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Syst Rev 4(1):170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chang C, Wang C, Wang K, Lin C, Chuang H, Wu Y, Chung T, Chen H (2012) Ciprofloxacin and tetracycline susceptibility of Lactobacilli isolated from indigenous children’s feces. Afr J Microbiol Res 6(2):245–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fukao M, Tomita H, Yakabe T, Nomura T, Ike Y, Yajima N (2009) Assessment of antibiotic resistance in probiotic strain Lactobacillus brevis KB290. J Food Prot 72(9):1923–1929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hummel A, Hertel C, Holzapfel W, Franz C (2007) Antibiotic resistances of starter and probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(3):730–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li S, Li Z, Wei W, Ma C, Song X, Li S, He W, Tian J, Huo X (2014) Association of mutation patterns in GyrA and ParC genes with quinolone resistance levels in lactic acid bacteria. J Antibiot 68(2):81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mahasneh MA, Hamdan S, Mahasneh AS (2015) Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus species isolated from local traditional fermented products. Jordan J Biol Sci 8(2):81–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renitta Jobby.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This manuscript does not contain any studies on animals performed by any of the authors. The milk and fecal samples were obtained directly from the local people of Bhatan Village.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jobby, R., Flora, Y., Bora, A. et al. Exploring Probiotic Activity of Lactobacillus sp. Isolated from Indigenous Breeds of Cattle Milk and Fecal Samples in Bhatan Village, MH., IN. Curr Microbiol 77, 1184–1190 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-01910-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-01910-x

Navigation