Skip to main content
Log in

Ethanol Production and Other Bioproducts by Galactomyces geotrichum from Sugarcane Bagasse Hydrolysate

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the enzymatic saccharification of alkaline-pretreated sugarcane bagasse (PSB) and the bioconversion of simple sugars from hydrolysates to ethanol and other bioproducts by the yeast Galactomyces geotrichum. The effects of percentage of dry substrate (3 and 10% w/v) and time of hydrolysis (24 and 72 h) in the content of released sugars were evaluated. The concentrations of monosaccharides and total reducing sugars (TRS) were calculated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and by 3.5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method, respectively. The highest concentrations of TRS, glucose and xylose (73.96, 31.78 and 10.85 g/L, respectively) were obtained after the saccharification of 10% of PSB with Cellic CTec3 multi-enzyme cocktail (10 FPU/g cellulose) during 72 h (hydrolysate IV). G. geotrichum UFVJM-R150 fermented both glucose and xylose from the hydrolysates. The most efficient ethanol production was obtained after the fermentation of hydrolysate IV (9.99 g/L of ethanol, volumetric productivity—QP of 0.42 g/L.h and yield of ethanol as a function of the substrate—YP/S of 0.27 gethanol/gsugar). Besides ethanol, G. geotrichum was also able to produce other high-value chemicals such as isoamyl alcohol and galacturonic acid. This is the first report of the potential of the yeast G. geotrichum to fermentate sugarcane bagasse hydrolysates with the production of important bioproducts to further use by biorefineries.

Graphic Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidén G, Zacchi G (2006) Bio-ethanol—the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol 24:549–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Petrou EC, Pappis CP (2009) Biofuels: a survey on pros and cons. Energy Fuels 23:1055–1066. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800806g

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guerrero AB, Ballesteros I, Ballesteros M (2018) The potential of agricultural banana waste for bioethanol production. Fuel 213:176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodrigues PO, Pereira JC, Santos DQ, Gurgel LVA, Pasquini D, Baffi MA (2018) Synergistic action of an Aspergillus (hemi-) cellulolytic consortium on sugarcane bagasse saccharification. Ind Crops Prod 109:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Valinhas RV, Pantoja LA, Maia ACF, Nelson DL et al (2018) Xylose fermentation to ethanol by new Galactomyces geotrichum and Candida akabanensis strains. Peer J 6:e4673. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pandey A, Soccol CR, Mitchell D (2000) New developments in solid state fermentation: I-bioprocesses and products. Process Biochem 35:1153–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(00)00152-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brito PL, Ferreira CMA, Silva AFF et al (2017) Hydrolysis, detoxification and alcoholic fermentation of hemicellulose fraction from palm press fiber. Waste Biomass Valor 9:957–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9882-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martins GM, Bocchini-Martins DA, Bezzerra-Bussoli C et al (2018) The isolation of pentose-assimilating yeasts and their xylose fermentation potential. Braz J Microbiol 49(1):162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.11.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Browing BL (1967) Chemical physics of ionic solutions. In: Wiley (ed.) Methods of wood chemistry. Wiley, New Jersey, p 498.

  10. Ghose TK (1987) Measurment of cellilase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198759020257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreira FS, Machado RG, Romão BB et al (2017) Improvement of hydrogen production by biological route using repeated batch cycles. Process Biochem 58:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.04.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bezerra TL, Ragauskas AJ (2016) A review of sugarcane bagasse for second-generation bioethanol and biopower production. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 10(5):634–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Namchot W, Panyacharay N, Jonglertjunya W, Sakdaronnarong C (2014) Hydrolysis of delignified sugarcane bagasse using hydrothermal technique catalyzed by carbonaceous acid catalysts. Fuel 116:608–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nascimento VM, Manrich A, Tardioli PW et al (2016) Alkaline pretreatment for practicable production of ethanol and xylooligosaccharides. Bioethanol 2:112–125. https://doi.org/10.1515/bioeth-2016-0008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Silva TAL, Zamora HDZ, Varão LHR, Prado NS, Baffi MA, Pasquini D (2017) Effect of steam explosion pretreatment catalysed by organic acid and alkali on chemical and structural properties and enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Waste Biomass Valoriz 9(11):2191–2201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9989-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Teixeira LC, Linden JC, Schroeder HA (2000) Simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation of peracetic acid-pretreated biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84(1–9):111–127. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:84-86:1-9:111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrade LP, Crespim E, de Oliveira N et al (2017) Influence of sugarcane bagasse variability on sugar recovery for cellulosic ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 241:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim JS, Lee YY, Kim TH (2016) A review on alkaline pretreatment technology for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 199:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lamounier KFR, Rodrigues PO, Pasquini D, Baffi MA (2018) Saccharification of sugarcane bagasse using an enzymatic extract produced by Aspergillus fumigatus. J Renew Mater 6(2):169–175. https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2017.634151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang Q, Yan Q, Fu J et al (2016) Comparative study of different alcoholate pretreatments for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 211:464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pereira JC, Travaini R, Paganini NM et al (2016) Saccharification of ozonated sugarcane bagasse using enzymes from Myceliophthora thermophila JCP 1–4 for sugars release and ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 204:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.064

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Santos JRA, Souto-Maior AM, Gouveia ER, Martín C (2010) Comparação entre processos em shf e em ssf de bagaço de cana-de-açúcar para a produção de etanol por Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Quim Nova 33:904–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Antunes FAF, Santos JC, Chandel AK et al (2016) Hemicellulosic ethanol production by immobilized wild brazilian yeast Scheffersomyces shehatae UFMG-HM 52.2: effects of cell concentration and stirring rate. Curr Microbiol 72:133–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-015-0923-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oliva-Neto PD, Dorta C, Azevedo AF et al (2013) The Brazilian technology of fuel ethanol fermentation—yeast inhibition factors and new perspectives to improve the technology. Mater Process Energy 1:371–379

    Google Scholar 

  26. Molnár E, Nemestóthy N, Bélafi-Bakó K (2008) Galacturonic acid recovery from pectin rich agro-wastes by electrodialysis with bipolar membranes. Hungarian J Ind Chem 36(1–2):95–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vogt M, Brüsseler C, Ooyen J et al (2016) Production of 2-methyl-1-butanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol in engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab Eng 38:436–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2016.10.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Azah RN, Roshanida AR, Norzita N (2014) Production of 3-methyl-1-butanol by yeast wild. Int J Biotechnol Bioeng 8(4):412–415. https://doi.org/10.1999/1307-6892/9999288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tokpohozin SE, Fischer S, Becker T (2019) Selection of a new Saccharomyces yeast to enhance relevant sorghum beer aroma components, higher alcohols and esters. Food Microbiol 83:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.05.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU) and Minas Gerais State Research Funding Agency (FAPEMIG Grant Number APQ-01360–14) for the financial support.

Funding

This study received financial support from the Minas Gerais State Research Funding Agency (FAPEMIG Grant Number APQ-01360–14).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.F.R. Lamounier designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. P.O. Rodrigues and A.S. Santos contributed to perform the experiments. D. Pasquini contributed with funding support and analysis of the data. M.A. Baffi supervised the design and development of research, the analysis of the data and the writing of the manuscript. All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milla Alves Baffi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lamounier, K.F.R., Rodrigues, P.O., Pasquini, D. et al. Ethanol Production and Other Bioproducts by Galactomyces geotrichum from Sugarcane Bagasse Hydrolysate. Curr Microbiol 77, 738–745 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01866-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01866-7

Profiles

  1. Alexandre Soares dos Santos