Skip to main content
Log in

Metabolomics Study of Subsurface Wastewater Infiltration System Under Fluctuation of Organic Load

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Subsurface Wastewater Infiltration System (SWIS) is a sewage ecological treatment technology with low investment, energy consumption, and operating cost. SWIS soil contains a large variety of microorganisms. The metabolic process and production of microorganisms are an important basis for qualitatively describing the process of pollutant removal. In order to discover the microbial decontamination pathways in SWIS, the metabolic profiles of soil microorganisms in SWIS were analyzed by UPLC-MS. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA)and principal component analysis (PCA) pattern recognition methods were used to classify the samples. According to the model's variable importance factor (VIP value), potential biomarkers were screened and biological information contained in the metabolites was also analyzed. The correlation between metabolites and environmental factors was explored by RDA analysis. In total, 230 differential metabolites with VIP value greater than 1.5 were screened out when the influent organic load fluctuated at 250 mg L−1, 400 mg L−1, and 500 mg L−1. After identifying and screening, 35 differential metabolites were identified and used to further analyze the metabolic pathway. It turns out that microbial metabolites in SWIS were mainly glycosides, fatty acids, amino acids, pigments, diterpenoids, and some polymers under medium and high organic loading conditions. At low organic load, the microbial metabolites in SWIS were mainly ketones, alcohols, and esters.

Graphic Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liang CL, Li Y, Chai BB et al (2019) Evaluating the effects of intermittent aeration and biochar addition on enhancing removal performance of subsurface wastewater infiltration systems with loess soil. Bioresour Technol Rep 5:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng FP, Huang LL, Pan J et al (2018) Does influent surface organic loading and aeration mode affect nitrogen removal and N2O emission in subsurface wastewater infiltration systems? Ecol Eng 123:168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao LF, Zhu W, Tong W (2009) Clogging processes caused by biofilm growth and organic particle accumulation in lab-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands. J Environ Sci 21(6):750–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pan J, Yu L, Wang Y (2012) Clogging process caused by organic particle accumulation and biofilm growth in subsurface wastewater infiltration system. J Donghua Univ 29(02):187–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirk JL, Beaudette LA, Hart M et al (2004) Methods of studying soil microbial diversity. J Microbiol Methods 58(2):169–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanazawa S, Itsuki A, Kawagoe M (2005) The numbers and biomass of bacteria and fungi obtained by the dilution plate count method and the direct count method by microscopy (Program for 2005 Annual Meeting of Japanese Society of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition). Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 76(4):459–470

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aydin S, Shahi A, Gozde Ozbayram E et al (2015) Use of PCR-DGGE based molecular methods to assessment of microbial diversity during anaerobic treatment of antibiotic combinations. Bioresour Technol 192:735–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pett RJ (2005) Redox fluctuation structures microbial communities in a wet tropical soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(11):6998–7007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu Y, Ou YJ, Liao CF et al (2019) High-throughput sequencing analysis of the expression profile of microRNAs and target genes in mechanical force-induced osteoblastic/cementoblastic differentiation of human periodontal ligament cells. Am J Transl Res 11(6):3398–3411

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones OAH, Sdepanian S, Lofts S et al (2014) Metabolomics analysis of soil communities can be used for pollution assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:61–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Villas-Bôas SG, Delicado DG, Akesson M et al (2004) Simultaneous analysis of amino and nonamino organic acids as methyl chloroformate derivatives using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 322(1):134–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Soga T, Imaizumi M (2001) Capillary electrophoresis method for the analysis of inorganic anions, organic acids, amino acids, nucleotides, carbohydrates and other anionic compounds. Electrophoresis 22:3418–3425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarissa W, Peet J, Jansen R et al (2016) Can a bmetabolomics-based approach be used as alternative to analyse fatty acid methyl esters from soil microbial communities? Soil Biol Biochem 103:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ran X, Ying M, Dongjie Z et al (2018) Discrimination of conventional and organic rice using untargeted LC-MS based metabolomics. J Cereal Sci 82:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Patejko M, Jacyna J, Markuszewski MJ (2016) Sample preparation procedures utilized in microbial metabolomics: an overview. J Chromatogr B 1043:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shao TT, Miki K, Yasumune N et al (2016) Random sample consensus combined with partial least squares regression (RANSAC-PLS) for microbial metabolomics data mining and phenotype improvement. Biosci Bioeng 122:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartman WH, Richardson CJ (2013) Differential nutrient limitation of soil microbial biomass and metabolic quotients (qCO2): is there a biological stoichiometry of soil microbes? PLoS ONE 8(3):57–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. He FP, Zhai JC, Zhang L et al (2018) Variations in gut microbiota and fecal metabolic phenotype associated with Fenbendazole and Ivermectin Tablets by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and LC/MS-based metabolomics in Amur tiger. Biochem Bioph Res Co 499:447–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao H, Liu YJ, Li Z et al (2018) Identification of essential hypertension biomarkers in human urine by nontargeted metabolomics based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS. Clin Chim Acta 486:192–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Buyer JS, Vinyard B, Maul J et al (2019) Combined extraction method for metabolomic and PLFA analysis of soil. Appl Soil Ecol 135:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li YH, Li HB, Xu XY et al (2018) Does carbon-nitrogen ratio affect nitrous oxide emission and spatial distribution in subsurface wastewater infiltration system? Bioresour Technol 18:846–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tong LL (2018) Discussion on the application of RDA analysis in water ecology evaluation in CANOCO4.5. Environ Sci 1:45–47 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kok EJ, Franssen-van Hal NL, Winnubst LN et al (2006) Assessment of representational difference analysis (RDA) to construct informative cDNA microarrays for gene expression analysis of species with limited transcriptome information, using red and green tomatoes as a model. J Plant Physiol 164(3):337–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Numbers 41571455, 51578115].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinghua Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, L., Li, Y., Su, F. et al. Metabolomics Study of Subsurface Wastewater Infiltration System Under Fluctuation of Organic Load. Curr Microbiol 77, 261–272 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01830-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01830-5

Navigation