Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli in Water Using Sample Concentration and Optimized Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Chromogenic Substrates


Methods for rapid detection of fecal indicator bacteria in water are important to ensure that water is safe for drinking, bathing, recreation, fishing and shellfish harvesting. In this study, we tested experimental conditions for bacterial hydrolysis of two promising enzymatic substrates, 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl β-d-glucuronide (X-Gluc) and Resorufin β-d-glucuronide (REG), and optimized parameters such as temperature and pH to determine conditions for rapid reactions. We then innovated a membrane filter-based approach to facilitate more rapid enzyme-based detection of Escherichia coli in water based on the combination of an initial concentration step and optimized test conditions. For this approach, a water sample (10‒100 mL) is filtered through a 0.45-µm pore size filter with a diameter of 4 or 13 mm. After filtration, a newly designed rapid detection broth is added containing the enzymatic inducer Methyl-beta-d-Glucuronide sodium (MetGlu) and the substrate REG or X-Gluc. After a few (1‒7) hours of incubation at 35 °C, the filter shows pink color (for REG-containing broth) or green color (for X-Gluc containing broth) if E. coli is present. The study provides insights and approaches towards developing a simple, fast, and low-cost method to detect fecal indicator bacteria in water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3


  1. 1.

    Bain R, Cronk R, Wright J, Yang H, Slaymaker T, Bartram J (2014) Fecal contamination of drinking-water in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001644

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pruss-Ustun A, Bartram J, Clasen T, Colford JM, Cumming O, Curtis V, Bonjour S, Dangour AD, De France J, Fewtrell L, Freeman MC, Gordon B, Hunter PR, Johnston RB, Mathers C, Mausezahl D, Medlicott K, Neira M, Stocks M, Wolf J, Cairncross S (2014) Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene in low- and middle-income settings: a retrospective analysis of data from 145 countries. Trop Med Int Health 19(8):894–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12329

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wu J, Long SC, Das D, Dorner SM (2011) Are microbial indicators and pathogens correlated? A statistical analysis of 40 years of research. J Water Health 9(2):265–278. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2011.117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    USEPA (1989) National primary drinking water regulations: total coliform rule, final rule. Fed Regist 54 (124):27544–27568

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fewtrell L, Bartram J (2001) Water quality: guidelines, standards and health: assessment of risk management for water-related infectious disease. WHO water series. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    WHO (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th edn. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rompre A, Servais P, Baudart J, de-Roubin MR, Laurent P (2002) Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches. J Microbiol Meth 49(1):31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00351-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Frahm E, Obst U (2003) Application of the fluorogenic probe technique (TaqMan PCR) to the detection of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli in water samples. J Microbiol Methods 52(1):123–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kong R, Lee S, Law T, Law S, Wu R (2002) Rapid detection of six types of bacterial pathogens in marine waters by multiplex PCR. Water Res 36(11):2802–2812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lee JY, Deininger RA (2004) Detection of E. coli in beach water within 1 hour using immunomagnetic separation and ATP bioluminescence. Luminescence 19(1):31–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ruan JH, Wang WJ, Zhang TY, Bai QY, Zheng T, Zhang ZD, Wu LY, Huang YF, Yu DJ (2017) Rapid detection of Serratia fonticola by TaqMan quantitative real-time PCR using primers targeting the gyrB gene. Curr Microbiol 74(11):1343–1348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Noble R, Weisberg R (2005) A review of technologies for rapid detection of bacteria in recreational waters. J Water Health 3:381–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gunda NSK, Naicker S, Shinde S, Kimbahune S, Shrivastava S, Mitra S (2014) Mobile Water Kit (MWK): a smartphone compatible low-cost water monitoring system for rapid detection of total coliform and E. coli. Anal Methods UK 6(16):6236–6246. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ay01245c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hesari N, Alum A, Elzein M, Abbaszadegan M (2016) A biosensor platform for rapid detection of E. coli in drinking water. Enzyme Microb Technol 83:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.11.007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lederberg J (1950) The beta-d-galactosidase of Escherichia coli, strain K-12. J Bacteriol 60(4):381

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rice EW, Allen MJ, Edberg SC (1990) Efficacy of beta-glucuronidase assay for identification of Escherichia coli by the defined-substrate technology. Appl Environ Microb 56(5):1203–1205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ley AN, Bowers RJ, Wolfe S (1988) Indoxyl-beta-D-glucuronide, a novel chromogenic reagent for the specific detection and enumeration of Escherichia coli in environmental-samples. Can J Microbiol 34(5):690–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Olstadt J, Schauer JJ, Standridge J, Kluender S (2007) A comparison of ten USEPA approved total coliform/E. coli tests. J Water Health 5(2):267–282

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stauber C, Miller C, Cantrell B, Kroell K (2014) Evaluation of the compartment bag test for the detection of Escherichia coli in water. J Microbiol Methods 99:66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2014.02.008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bain RES, Woodall C, Elliott J, Arnold BF, Tung R, Morley R, du Preez M, Bartram JK, Davis AP, Gundry SW, Pedley S (2015) Evaluation of an inexpensive growth medium for direct detection of Escherichia coli in temperate and sub-tropical waters. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140997

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Magro G, Bain RES, Woodall CA, Matthews RL, Gundry SW, Davis AP (2014) Synthesis and application of resorufin beta-D-glucuronide, a low-cost chromogenic substrate for detecting Escherichia coli in drinking water. Environ Sci Technol 48(16):9624–9631. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502319n

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tryland I, Fiksdal L (1998) Enzyme characteristics of beta-D-galactosidase- and beta-D-glucuronidase-positive bacteria and their interference in rapid methods for detection of waterborne coliforms and Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microb 64(3):1018–1023

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gallagher SR (1992) Quantitation of GUS activity by fluorometry. GUS protocols: using the GUS gene as a reporter of gene expression. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liang W-J, Wilson KJ, Xie H, Knol J, Suzuki SI, Rutherford NG, Henderson PJ, Jefferson RA (2005) The gusBC genes of Escherichia coli encode a glucuronide transport system. J Bacteriol 187(7):2377–2385

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Togo CA, Wutor VC, Pletschke BI (2006) Properties of in situ Escherichia coli -D-glucuronidase (GUS): evaluation of chemical interference on the direct enzyme assay for faecal pollution detection in water. Afr J Biotechnol 5(22):2338–2344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fior S, Vianelli A, Gerola PD (2009) A novel method for fluorometric continuous measurement of P-glucuronidase (GUS) activity using 4-methyl-umbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide (MUG) as substrate. Plant Sci 176(1):130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.10.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank UNICEF (No. 43171142) and the North Carolina Sea Grant (No. 2014-1751-02) for financial support.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianyong Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no any conflict of interest with these awards. Jamie Bartram has served on UNICEF advisory committees unconnected to the subject of the award.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, J., Stewart, J.R., Sobsey, M.D. et al. Rapid Detection of Escherichia coli in Water Using Sample Concentration and Optimized Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Chromogenic Substrates. Curr Microbiol 75, 827–834 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-018-1454-8

Download citation