Advertisement

Current Microbiology

, Volume 75, Issue 5, pp 604–610 | Cite as

The Efficacy of a Chewing Gum Containing Phyllanthus emblica Fruit Extract in Improving Oral Health

  • Qian Gao
  • Xuemei Li
  • Haitao Huang
  • Ying Guan
  • Qili Mi
  • Jianhua Yao
Article

Abstract

Phyllanthus emblica: (PE) fruit extract has pharmacological activity and exert anti-bacterial, anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer effects, but few study exist for evaluating its improved effects on the imbalance of oral ecology, which may contribute to series of oral diseases. In this study, an examiner-blinded, randomized, and gum-base-controlled crossover manner was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a sugar-free chewing gum containing PE fruit extract in changing the oral microbiome. Twenty healthy young adults were randomly instructed to chew either PE gum or placebo gum. Saliva samples were collected at baseline and from 0 to 2, 2 to 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 15, and 75 to 80 min after each intervention. The following outcomes were measured: (i) salivary flow rate and pH value; (ii) total bacteria, Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) counts; and (iii) volatile sulfur compound (VSC) concentrations. The results showed similar data between groups at baseline and significantly higher salivary flow rates and pH levels in the PE fruit gum group after 0–2, 2–5, and 5–10 min of chewing. Assessment of total bacteria, S. mutans, P. gingivalis, and VSC levels revealed significant differences between the PE and control gum groups at 75–80 min. No adverse effects were registered. The present finding indicated chewing gum containing PE fruit extract stimulated salivary flow and significantly reduced clinical test indexes in the short term. Chewing PE gum might be a safe means of improving oral hygiene.

Notes

Author Contributions

JY and QG conceived and designed the experiments; HH contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation; YG and QM performed the experiments; XL proofread the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd Science and Technology Project (Grant Numbers 2017JC05 and 2015JC02).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Aguirre-Zero O, Zero DT, Proskin HM (1993) Effect of chewing xylitol chewing gum on salivary flow rate and the acidogenic potential of dental plaque. Caries Res 27(1):55–59CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baliga S, Muglikar S, Kale R (2013) Salivary pH: a diagnostic biomarker. J Indian Soc Periodontol 17(4):461–465.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.118317 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawes C, Kubieniec K (2004) The effects of prolonged gum chewing on salivary flow rate and composition. Arch Oral Biol 49(8):665–669.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.02.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dawes C, Macpherson LM (1992) Effects of nine different chewing-gums and lozenges on salivary flow rate and pH. Caries Res 26(3):176–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gaire BP, Subedi L (2014) Phytochemistry, pharmacology and medicinal properties of Phyllanthus emblica Linn. Chin J Integr Med.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-014-1984-2 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haghgoo R, Afshari E, Ghanaat T, Aghazadeh S (2015) Comparing the efficacy of xylitol-containing and conventional chewing gums in reducing salivary counts of Streptococcus mutans: an in vivo study. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent 5(Suppl 2):S112–S117.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.172947 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hossen S, Sarkar R, Mahmud S, Aziz N (2014) Medicinal potential of Phyllanthus emblica (Linn.) fruits extracts: biological and pharmacological activities. Br J Pharm Res 4:1486–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu DY, Hong X, Li X (2011) Oral health in China–trends and challenges. Int J Oral Sci 3(1):7–12.  https://doi.org/10.4248/IJOS11006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Islam T, Azad A, Akter S, Datta S (2012) Antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants on Streptococcus mutans, a causing agent of dental caries. Int J Eng Res Technol 1(10):1–6Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karami-Nogourani M, Kowsari-Isfahan R, Hosseini-Beheshti M (2011) The effect of chewing gum’s flavor on salivary flow rate and pH. Dent Res J 8(Suppl 1):S71–S75Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karami Nogourani M, Janghorbani M, Kowsari Isfahan R, Hosseini Beheshti M (2012) Effects of chewing different flavored gums on salivary flow rate and pH. Int J Dent 2012:569327.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/569327 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kilian M, Chapple IL, Hannig M, Marsh PD, Meuric V, Pedersen AM, Tonetti MS, Wade WG, Zaura E (2016) The oral microbiome—an update for oral healthcare professionals. Br Dent J 221(10):657–666.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.865 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krishnaveni M, Mirunalini S (2010) Therapeutic potential of Phyllanthus emblica (amla): the ayurvedic wonder. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 21(1):93–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Llena-Puy C (2006) The role of saliva in maintaining oral health and as an aid to diagnosis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 11(5):E449–E455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mahata S, Pandey A, Shukla S, Tyagi A, Husain SA, Das BC, Bharti AC (2013) Anticancer activity of Phyllanthus emblica Linn. (Indian gooseberry): inhibition of transcription factor AP-1 and HPV gene expression in cervical cancer cells. Nutr Cancer 65(Suppl 1):88–97.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2013.785008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayachiew P, Devahastin S (2008) Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Indian gooseberry and galangal extracts. LWT-Food Sci Technol 41(7):1153–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mayanagi G, Igarashi K, Washio J, Takahashi N (2017) pH Response and tooth surface solubility at the tooth/bacteria interface. Caries Res 51(2):160–166.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000454781 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meng Y, Liu XN, Zheng SG (2017) Status and analysis of oral disease burden: comparison of the domestic and overseas data. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 52(6):386–389.  https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.06.014 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muniz FW, Friedrich SA, Silveira CF, Rosing CK (2017) The impact of chewing gum on halitosis parameters: a systematic review. J Breath Res 11(1):014001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/aa5cc2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Okahashi N, Sasakawa C, Yoshikawa M, Hamada S, Koga T (1989) Molecular characterization of a surface protein antigen gene from serotype c Streptococcus mutans, implicated in dental caries. Mol Microbiol 3(5):673–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pientaweeratch S, Panapisal V, Tansirikongkol A (2016) Antioxidant, anti-collagenase and anti-elastase activities of Phyllanthus emblica, Manilkara zapota and silymarin: an in vitro comparative study for anti-aging applications. Pharm Biol 54(9):1865–1872.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2015.1133658 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rösing C, Gomes S, Bassani D, Oppermann R (2009) Effect of chewing gums on the production of volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) in vivo. Acta Odontol Latinoam 22(1):11–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rahman S, Akbor MM, Howlader A, Jabbar A (2009) Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activity of the alkaloids of Amlaki (Emblica officinalis). Pak J Biol Sci 12(16):1152–1155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rahmatullah M, Hossan N, Rashid MH, Rahman T, Chowdhury MH, Jahan R (2009) A survey of medicinal plants in two areas of Dinajpur district, Bangladesh including plants which can be used as functional foods. Am Eurasian J Sustain Agric 3(4):862–876Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rattanasena P (2012) Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of vegetables and fruits commonly consumed in Thailand. Pak J Biol Sci 15(18):877–882CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reingewirtz Y, Girault O, Reingewirtz N, Senger B, Tenenbaum H (1999) Mechanical effects and volatile sulfur compound-reducing effects of chewing gums: comparison between test and base gums and a control group. Quintessence Int 30(5):319–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ribelles Llop M, Guinot Jimeno F, Mayne Acien R, Bellet Dalmau LJ (2010) Effects of xylitol chewing gum on salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity and presence of Streptococcus mutans in saliva. Eur J Paediatr Dent 11(1):9–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Slots J, Ting M (1999) Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in human periodontal disease: occurrence and treatment. Periodontol 2000 20:82–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Struzycka I (2014) The oral microbiome in dental caries. Pol J Microbiol 63(2):127–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tanaka M, Toe M, Nagata H, Ojima M, Kuboniwa M, Shimizu K, Osawa K, Shizukuishi S (2010) Effect of eucalyptus-extract chewing gum on oral malodor: a double-masked, randomized trial. J Periodontol 81(11):1564–1571.  https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100249 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tonzetich J (1971) Direct gas chromatographic analysis of sulphur compounds in mouth air in man. Arch Oral Biol 16(6):587–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tonzetich J, Eigen E, King W, Weiss S (1967) Volatility as a factor in the inability of certain amines and indole to increase the odour of saliva. Arch Oral Biol 12(10):1167–1175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang CC, Yuan JR, Wang CF, Yang N, Chen J, Liu D, Song J, Feng L, Tan XB, Jia XB (2016) Anti-inflammatory effects of Phyllanthus emblica l on benzopyrene-induced precancerous lung lesion by regulating the IL-1beta/miR-101/Lin28B signaling pathway. Integr Cancer Ther.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735416659358 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu M, Zhu HT, Cheng RR, Wang D, Yang CR, Tanaka T, Kouno I, Zhang YJ (2016) Antioxidant and hyaluronidase inhibitory activities of diverse phenolics in Phyllanthus emblica. Nat Prod Res.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2015.1137573 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoshida A, Suzuki N, Nakano Y, Kawada M, Oho T, Koga T (2003) Development of a 5′ nuclease-based real-time pcr assay for quantitative detection of cariogenic dental pathogens Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. J Clin Microbiol 41(9):4438–4441.  https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.9.4438-4441.2003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qian Gao
    • 1
  • Xuemei Li
    • 1
  • Haitao Huang
    • 1
  • Ying Guan
    • 1
  • Qili Mi
    • 1
  • Jianhua Yao
    • 1
  1. 1.Technology Center of China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co. Ltd.KunmingChina

Personalised recommendations