Advertisement

Current Microbiology

, Volume 74, Issue 7, pp 779–786 | Cite as

Genomic Diversity of Type B3 Bacteriophages of Caulobacter crescentus

  • Kurt T. Ash
  • Kristina M. Drake
  • Whitney S. Gibbs
  • Bert ElyEmail author
Article

Abstract

The genomes of the type B3 bacteriophages that infect Caulobacter crescentus are among the largest phage genomes thus far deposited into GenBank with sizes over 200 kb. In this study, we introduce six new bacteriophage genomes which were obtained from phage collected from various water systems in the southeastern United States and from tropical locations across the globe. A comparative analysis of the 12 available genomes revealed a “core genome” which accounts for roughly 1/3 of these bacteriophage genomes and is predominately localized to the head, tail, and lysis gene regions. Despite being isolated from geographically distinct locations, the genomes of these bacteriophages are highly conserved in both genome sequence and gene order. We also identified the insertions, deletions, translocations, and horizontal gene transfer events which are responsible for the genomic diversity of this group of bacteriophages and demonstrated that these changes are not consistent with the idea that modular reassortment of genomes occurs in this group of bacteriophages.

Keywords

Core Gene Phage Genome Major Capsid Protein Phage Gene Swarmer Cell 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation Grant EF-0826792 and NIH Grants R25GM066526 and R25GM076277 to BE.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Competing interest

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Agabian-Keshishian N, Shapiro L (1970) Stalked bacteria: properties of deoxyribonucleic acid bacteriophage phiCbK. J Virol 5(6):795–800PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ash K, Brown T, Watford T, Scott LE, Stephens C, Ely B (2014) A comparison of the Caulobacter NA1000 and K31 genomes reveals extensive genome rearrangements and differences in metabolic potential. Open Biol. doi: 10.1098/rsob.140128 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Goker M (2010) Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genom Sci 2(1):117–134. doi: 10.4056/sigs.531120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O (2008) The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Botstein D (1980) A theory of modular evolution for bacteriophages. Ann N Y Acad Sci 354:484–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Comeau AM, Bertrand C, Letarov A, Tetart F, Krisch HM (2007) Modular architecture of the T4 phage superfamily: a conserved core genome and a plastic periphery. Virology 362:384–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT (2010) progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 5(6):e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dillard RS, Storms RE, De Masi L, Hampton C, Panis G, Patrick H, Viollier PH, Wright ER (2016) Analysis of phage-pilus interactions in Caulobacter crescentus. Microsc Microanal 22(Suppl 3):202–203. doi: 10.1017/S1431927616001860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ely B (1991) Genetics of Caulobacter crescentus. Methods Enzymol 204:372–384. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)04019-k CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ely B, Gibbs W, Diez S, Ash K (2015) The Caulobacter crescentus transducing phage Cr30 is a unique member of the T4-Like family of myophages. Curr Microbiol 70(6):854–858. doi: 10.1007/s00284-015-0799-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ely B, Johnson RC (1977) Generalized transduction in Caulobacter crescentus. Genetics 87:391–399PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan YL, Postlethwait J (1999) Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151(4):1531–1545PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gill JJ, Berry JD, Russell WK, Lessor L, Escobar-Garcia DA, Hernandez D, Kane A, Keene J, Maddox M, Martin R, Mohan S, Thorn AM, Russell DH, Young R (2012) The Caulobacter crescentus phage phiCbK: genomics of a canonical phage. BMC Genom 13:542. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-542 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guerrero-Ferreira RC, Viollier PH, Ely B, Poindexter JS, Georgieva M, Jensen GJ, Wright ER (2011) Alternative mechanism for bacteriophage adsorption to the motile bacterium Caulobacter crescentus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(24):9963–9968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012388108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson RC, Ely B (1977) Isolation of spontaneously derived mutants of Caulobacter crescentus. Genetics 86(1):25–32PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson RC, Wood NB, Ely B (1977) Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages for Caulobacter crescentus. J Gen Virol 37(2):323–335. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-37-2-323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lagenaur C, Farmer S, Agabian N (1977) Adsorption properties of stage-specific Caulobacter phage phiCbK. Virology 77:401–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Milne I, Bayer M, Cardle L, Shaw P, Stephen G, Wright F, Marshall D (2010) Tablet—next generation sequence assembly visualization. Bioinformatics 26(3):401–402. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp666 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R (2013) The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42(D1):D206–214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paez-Espino D, Sharon I, Morovic W, Stahl B, Thomas BC, Barrangou R, Banfield JF (2015) CRISPR immunity drives rapid phage genome evolution in Streptococcus thermophilus. MBio. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00262-15 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Panis G, Lambert C, Viollier PH (2012) Complete genome sequence of Caulobacter crescentus bacteriophage phiCbK. J Virol 86(18):10234–10235. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01579-12 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poindexter JS (1964) Biological properties and classification of the Caulobacter group. Bacteriol Rev 28:231–295PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B (2000) Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16(10):944–945CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scott D, Ely B (2016) Conservation of the essential genome among Caulobacter and Brevundimonas species. Curr Microbiol 72:503–510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10(3):512–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30(12):2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt T. Ash
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kristina M. Drake
    • 1
    • 3
  • Whitney S. Gibbs
    • 1
    • 4
  • Bert Ely
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA
  3. 3.Medical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  4. 4.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations