Current Microbiology

, Volume 71, Issue 2, pp 291–295 | Cite as

Antimicrobial Activity of Copper Alloys Against Invasive Multidrug-Resistant Nosocomial Pathogens

  • Ozgen Koseoglu EserEmail author
  • Alper Ergin
  • Gulsen Hascelik


The emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance demanded novel approaches for the prevention of nosocomial infections, and metallic copper surfaces have been suggested as an alternative for the control of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in surfaces in the hospital environment. This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of copper material for invasive MDR nosocomial pathogens isolated over time, in comparison to stainless steel. Clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (n:4), OXA-23 and OXA-58 positive, MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n:6) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n:4) were evaluated. The antimicrobial activity of coupons containing 99 % copper and a brass alloy containing 63 % copper was assessed against stainless steel. All the materials demonstrated statistically significant differences within each other for the logarithmic reduction of microorganisms. Among the three materials, the highest reduction of microorganisms was seen in 99 % copper and the least in stainless steel. The result was statistically significant especially for 0, 2, and 4 h (P = 0.05). 99 % copper showed a bactericidal effect at less than 1 h for MRSA and at 2 h for P. aeruginosa. 63 % copper showed a bactericidal effect at 24 h for P. aeruginosa strains only. Stainless steel surfaces exhibited a bacteriostatic effect after 6 h for P. aeruginosa strains only. 99 % copper reduced the number of bacteria used significantly, produced a bactericidal effect and was more effective than 63 % copper. The use of metallic copper material could aid in reducing the concentration of bacteria, especially for invasive nosocomial pathogens on hard surfaces in the hospital environment.


Copper Alloy Bactericidal Effect Colistin Acinetobacter Baumannii Hospital Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study was presented in the 114th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, May 17–20, 2014, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. We would like to thank Selçuk Korkmaz (Hacettepe University, Department of Biostatistics) for interpreting the statistical analysis of the data and Tülay Özçelik for technical assistance.


  1. 1.
    Borkow G, Monk A (2012) Fighting nosocomial infections with biocidal non-intrusive hard and soft surfaces. World J Infect Dis 2:77–90Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cervantes HI, Alvarez JA, Munoz JM, Arreguin V, Mosqueda JL, Macias AE (2013) Antimicrobial activity of copper against organisms in aqueous solution: a case for copper-based water pipelines in hospitals? Am J Infect Control 41:e115–e118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2013) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-third informational supplement CLSI document M100-S23, Wayne, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Efstathiou PA (2011) The role of antimicrobial copper surfaces in reducing healthcare-associated infections. Eur Infect Dis 5:125–128Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Espirito Santo C, Law EW, Elowsky CG, Quaranta D, Domaille DW, Chang CJ et al (2011) Bacterial killing by dry metallic copper surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:794–802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giske CG, Monnet DL, Cars O, Carmeli Y (2008) Clinical and economic impact of common multidrug resistant gram negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:813–821PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gould SWJ, Fielder MD, Kelly AF, Morgan M, Kenny J, Naughton DP (2009) The antimicrobial properties of copper surfaces against a range of important nosocomial pathogens. Ann Microbiol 59:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grass G, Rensing C, Solioz M (2011) Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:1541–1547PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang HI, Shih HY, Lee CM, Yang TC, Lay JJ, Lin YE (2008) In vitro efficacy of copper and silver ions in eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii: implications for on-site disinfection for hospital infection control. Water Res 42:73–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G (2006) How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 6:130PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maragakis LL (2010) Recognition and prevention of multidrug-resistant gram negative bacteria in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 38:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mathews S, Hans M, Mücklich F, Solioz M (2013) Contact killing of bacteria on copper is suppressed if bacterial-metal contact is prevented and is induced on iron by copper ions. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:2605–2611PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mehtar S, Wild I, Todorov SD (2008) The antimicrobial activity of copper and copper alloys against nosocomial pathogens and Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from healthcare facilities in the Western Cape: an in vitro study. J Hosp Infect 68:45–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Michels HT, Noyce JO, Keevil CW (2009) Effects of temperature and humidity on the efficacy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus challenged antimicrobial materials containing silver and copper. Lett Appl Microbiol 49:191–195PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Monk AB, Kanmukhla V, Trinder K, Borkow G (2014) Potent bactericidal efficacy of copper oxide impregnated non-porous solid surfaces. BMC Microbiol 14:57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Noyce JO, Michels H, Keevil CW (2006) Potential use of copper surfaces to reduce survival of epidemic meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the healthcare environment. J Hosp Infect 63:289–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Noyce JO, Michels HT, Keevil CW (2006) Use of copper cast alloys to control Escherichia coli 0157 cross-contamination during food processing. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4239–4244PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    O’Gorman J, Humphreys H (2012) Application of copper to prevent and control infection. Where are we now? J Hosp Infect 81:217–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peterson LR (2009) Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESCAPE revisited. Clin Infect Dis 49:992–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Santo CE, Morais PV, Grass G (2010) Isolation and characterization of bacteria resistant to metallic copper surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:1341–1348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salgado CD, Sepkowitz KA, John JF (2013) Copper surfaces reduce the rate of healthcare-acquired infections in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:479–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Souli M, Galani I, Plachouras D, Panagea T, Armaganidis A, Petrikkos G et al (2013) Antimicrobial activity of copper surfaces against carbapenemase-producing contemporary Gram-negative clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 68:852–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Varghese S, ElFakhri SO, Sheel DW, Sheel P, Bolton FJE, Foster HA (2013) Antimicrobial activity of novel nanostructured Cu-SiO2 coatings prepared by chemical vapour deposition against hospital related pathogens. AMB Express 3:53PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Warnes SL, Highmore CJ, Keevil CW (2012) Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes on abiotic touch surfaces: Implications for public health. mBio 3:e489–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Warnes SL, Green SM, Michels HT, Keevil CW (2010) Biocidal efficacy of copper alloys against pathogenic enterococci involves degradation of genomic and plasmid DNAs. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5390–5401PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Warnes SL, Keevil CW (2011) Mechanism of copper surface toxicity in vancomycin-resistant enterococci following wet or dry surface contact. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:6049–6059PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weber DJ, Anderson D, Rutala WA (2013) The role of the surface environment in healthcare-associated infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 26:338–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ozgen Koseoglu Eser
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alper Ergin
    • 2
  • Gulsen Hascelik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.School of Health ServicesHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations