Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enzymatic Pre-treatment of Wastewater to Minimize Recovery by Reverse Transcriptase PCR of RNA from Inactive Bacteriophages

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative viral risk assessments for wastewaters are notoriously difficult. The often considered quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR reflects poorly on virus infectivity rates leading to inaccurate risk interpretations. Various techniques focused on the degradation of the nucleic acids of non-infective viruses were previously employed. We comparatively assessed the effectiveness of such enzymatic treatments for MS2 bacteriophage in treated wastewaters. The single use of RNase A at an appropriate concentration may be as effective as the combination of RNase followed by Proteinase K and more rapid. While all tested enzymatic treatments minimized recovery of RNA (>95 %) in the absence of infective MS2, none completely eliminated the signal recovery. Selection of any enzymatic protocol for minimizing recovery of RNA from degraded, non-infective viruses should balance the methods efficacy with its expediency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Chapron CD, Ballester NA, Margolin AB (2000) The detection of astrovirus in sludge biosolids using an integrated cell culture nested PCR technique. J Appl Microbiol 89(1):11–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Diez-Valcarce M, Kovač K, Raspor P, Rodríguez-Lázaro D, Hernández M (2011) Virus genome quantification does not predict norovirus infectivity after application of food inactivation processing technologies. Food Environ Virol 3(3–4):141–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ireland DD, Stohlman SA, Hinton DR, Kapil P, Silverman RH, Atkinson RA, Bergmann CC (2009) RNase L mediated protection from virus induced demyelination. PLoS Pathog 5(10):e1000602

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katayama HNM, Ohgaki S (2001) Advances in water and wastewater treatment technology: molecular technology, nutrient removal, sludge reduction and environmental health. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lamhoujeb S, Fliss I, Ngazoa SE, Jean J (2008) Evaluation of the persistence of infectious human noroviruses on food surfaces by using real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(11):3349–3355

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mormann S, Dabisch M, Becker B (2010) Effects of technological processes on the tenacity and inactivation of norovirus genogroup II in experimentally contaminated foods. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(2):536–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nuanualsuwan S, Cliver DO (2002) Pretreatment to avoid positive RT-PCR results with inactivated viruses. J Virol Methods 104(2):217–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Connell KP, Bucher JR, Anderson PE, Cao CJ, Khan AS, Gostomski MV, Valdes JJ (2006) Real-time fluorogenic reverse transcription-PCR assays for detection of bacteriophage MS2. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(1):478–483

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pecson BM, Martin LV, Kohn T (2009) Quantitative PCR for determining the infectivity of bacteriophage MS2 upon inactivation by heat, UV-B radiation, and singlet oxygen: advantages and limitations of an enzymatic treatment to reduce false-positive results. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(17):5544–5554

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SantaLucia J (1998) A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(4):1460–1465

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sigala JUA (2012) A PCR-DGGE approach to evaluate the impact of wastewater source on the antibiotic resistance diversity in treated wastewater effluent. Water Sci Technol 65:1323–1333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sobsey MD, Battigelli DA, Shin GA, Newland S (1998) RT-PCR amplification detects inactivated viruses in water and wastewater. Water Sci Technol 38(12):91–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. USEPA (2001) Method 1601: Male-specific (F+) and somatic coliphage in water by two-step enrichment procedure—EPA 821-R-01-030. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Water Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. Unnithan VV, Unc A, Joe V, Smith GB (2014) Short RNA indicator sequences are not completely degraded by autoclaving. Sci Rep 4:4070

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL (2012) Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 13(1):134

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuker M (2003) Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31(13):3406–3415

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the New Mexico State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, and by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-EE0003046 awarded to the National Alliance for Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts. A. Unc has received support from the University of Leeds through a water@leeds Senior Cheney Fellowship during data analysis and manuscript preparation.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veena V. Unnithan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (EPS 133 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (EPS 1071 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Unnithan, V.V., Unc, A. & Smith, G.B. Enzymatic Pre-treatment of Wastewater to Minimize Recovery by Reverse Transcriptase PCR of RNA from Inactive Bacteriophages. Curr Microbiol 71, 49–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-015-0830-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-015-0830-x

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Adrian Unc