Abstract
Campylobacter spp. are the most important food-borne pathogens in broilers. Exposure of the consumer can be influenced by the reduction of contaminated broiler meat at various steps along the production line. This study was performed at a poultry slaughterhouse in Germany. Steps within the slaughter process were defined by the slaughterhouse quality control for potential Campylobacter reduction. Their impact was tested for two process variations. The first process variation was the increase of the temperature of the scalding water from 53.0 to 53.9 °C. The second step was the application of an additional outside sprayer which was placed after plucking. The increase of the scalding water temperature was the most effective measure (>2 log reduction), but resulted in defects to the broiler skin. This would limit marketing of fresh broiler meat with skin. The additional water spray after plucking had no additional effect. In fact, numbers of Campylobacter were lower before introduction of the sprayer. In conclusion, modifications of the processing technology have to be evaluated carefully, but can have additional effects for Campylobacter reduction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon (2005) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:338:0001:0026:DE:PDF. Accessed 11-2013
Bashor MP, Curtis PA, Keener KM, Sheldon BW, Kathariou S, Osborne JA (2004) Effects of carcass washers on Campylobacter contamination in large broiler processing plants. Poult Sci 83(7):1232–1239
Batz MB, Hoffmann S, Morris JG Jr (2012) Ranking the disease burden of 14 pathogens in food sources in the United States using attribution data from outbreak investigations and expert elicitation. J Food Prot 75(7):1278–1291
Berrang ME, Bailey JS (2009) On-line brush and spray washers to lower numbers of Campylobacter and Escherichia coli and presence of Salmonella on broiler carcasses during processing. J Appl Poult Res 18:74–78
Bryan FL, Doyle MP (1995) Health risks and consequences of Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni in raw poultry. J Food Prot 58(3):326–344
Brynestad S, Braute L, Luber P, Bartelt E (2008) Quantitative microbiological risk assessment of campylobacteriosis cases in the German population due to consumption of chicken prepared in homes. Int J Risk Assessment and Management 8(3):194–213
Cox JM, Pavic A (2010) Advances in enteropathogen control in poultry production. J Appl Microbiol 108(3):745–755
EFSA (2011) Scientific Opinion on Campylobacter in broiler meat production: control options and performance objectives and/or targets at different stages of the food chain. EFSA J 9(4):141
Ellerbroek L (2012) Application of microbiological criteria in food processing - metrics. Arch Lebensmittelhyg 63(4):101–106
FSIS (2012) FSIS Notice 54-12: Performance standards for Salmonella and Campylobacter in chilled carcasses at young chicken and turkey slaughter establishments. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OPPDE/rdad/FSISNotices/54-12.pdf. Accessed 11-2013
Hansson I, Pudas N, Harbom B, Engvall EO (2010) Within-flock variations of Campylobacter loads in caeca and on carcasses from broilers. Int J Food Microbiol 141(1–2):51–55
Havelaar AH, Haagsma JA, Mangen MJ, Kemmeren JM, Verhoef LP, Vijgen SM, Wilson M, Friesema IH, Kortbeek LM, van Duynhoven YT, van Pelt W (2012) Disease burden of foodborne pathogens in the Netherlands, 2009. Int J Food Microbiol 156(3):231–238
Hoffmann S, Batz MB, Morris JG Jr (2012) Annual cost of illness and quality-adjusted life year losses in the United States due to 14 foodborne pathogens. J Food Prot 75(7):1292–1302
Kim JW, Slavik MF, Walker JT, Griffis LC (1993) Attachment of Salmonella Typhimurium to skin of chicken scalded at various temperatures. J Food Prot 56:661–665
Kim JS, Kim JW, Kathariou S (2008) Differential effects of temperature on natural transformation to erythromycin and nalidixic acid resistance in Campylobacter coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(19):6121–6125
Klein G (2010) Interventionsmaßnahmen gegen Campylobacter in der Primärproduktion und in der Geflügelfleischgewinnung. Arch Lebensmittelhyg 3:108–111
Klein G, Reich F, Beckmann L, Atanassova V (2007) Quantification of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in broilers during meat processing. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 92(3):267–273
Lehner Y (2010) Prozessoptimierungen in der Broilerschlachtung zur quantitativen Reduktion von thermophilen Campylobacter spp. auf frischem Geflügelfleisch und -produkten. Thesis Vet. med., University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany
Lienau JA, Ellerbroek L, Klein G (2007) Tracing flock-related Campylobacter clones from broiler farms through slaughter to retail products by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Food Prot 70(3):536–542
MAF (2011) NMD Campylobacter performance target (Phase 1). http://www.foodsafety.govt.nz/elibrary/industry/consultation-proposed-changes-to-campylobacter-performance-target/analysis-of-submissions.pdf. Accessed 11-2013
MAF (2011) Proposed changes to the Campylobacter performance target (Phase 1). http://www.foodsafety.govt.nz/elibrary/industry/consultation-proposed-changes-to-campylobacter-performance-target/discussion-paper.pdf. Accessed 11-2013
Notermans S, Kampelmacher EH (1974) Attachment of some bacterial strains to the skin of broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 15(6):573–585
Notermans S, Kampelmacher EH (1975) Further studies on the attachment of bacteria to skin. Br Poult Sci 16(5):487–496
Osiriphun S, Tuitemwong P, Koetsinchai W, Tuitemwong K, Erickson LE (2012) Model of inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni in poultry scalding. J Food Eng 110:38–43
Reich F, Atanassova V, Haunhorst E, Klein G (2008) The effects of Campylobacter numbers in caeca on the contamination of broiler carcasses with Campylobacter. Int J Food Microbiol 127(1–2):116–120
Romero-Barrios P, Hempen M, Messens W, Stella P, Hugas M (2013) Quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) of food-borne zoonoses at the European level. Food Control 29(2):343–349
Rosenquist H, Nielsen NL, Sommer HM, Norrung B, Christensen BB (2003) Quantitative risk assessment of human campylobacteriosis associated with thermophilic Campylobacter species in chickens. Int J Food Microbiol 83(1):87–103
Sakkaf AA, Jones G (2012) Thermal inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni in broth. J Food Prot 75(6):1029–1035
Shane SM (1992) The significance of Campylobacter jejuni infection in poultry - a review. Avian Pathol 21(2):189–213
Stopforth JD, O’Connor R, Lopes M, Kottapalli B, Hill WE, Samadpour M (2007) Validation of individual and multiple-sequential interventions for reduction of microbial populations during processing of poultry carcasses and parts. J Food Prot 70(6):1393–1401
Van Gerwe TJ, Bouma A, Jacobs-Reitsma WF, van den Broek J, Klinkenberg D, Stegeman JA, Heesterbeek JA (2005) Quantifying transmission of Campylobacter spp. among broilers. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(10):5765–5770
Wempe JM, Genigeorgis CA, Farver TB, Yusufu HI (1983) Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in two California chicken processing plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 45(2):355–359
Yang H, Li Y, Johnson MG (2001) Survival and death of Salmonella Typhimurium and Campylobacter jejuni in processing water and on chicken skin during poultry scalding and chilling. J Food Prot 64(6):770–776
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lehner, Y., Reich, F. & Klein, G. Influence of Process Parameter on Campylobacter spp. Counts on Poultry Meat in a Slaughterhouse Environment. Curr Microbiol 69, 240–244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-014-0575-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-014-0575-y