Skip to main content

Development of Luciferase Expressing Leishmania donovani Axenic Amastigotes as Primary Model for In Vitro Screening of Antileishmanial Compounds

Abstract

The development of new therapeutic leads against leishmaniasis relies primarily on screening of a large number of compounds on multiplication of clinically irrelevant transgenic promastigotes. The advent of the successful in vitro culture of axenic amastigotes allows the development of transgenic axenic amastigotes as a primary screen which can test compounds in a high throughput mode like promastigotes, still representative of the clinically relevant mammalian amastigotes stage. The present study reports the development of luciferase-tagged axenic amastigotes of Leishmania donovani, the causative agent of Indian Kala-azar, for in vitro drug screening. Luciferase expressing promastigotes were transformed to axenic amastigotes at a low pH and high temperature without the loss of luciferase expression. As compared to transgenic promastigotes, the luciferase expressing axenic amastigotes exhibited more sensitivity to antileishmanial drugs, particularly to pentavalent antimony (~2.8-fold) and also to the test compounds. Hence, the developed luciferase expressing axenic amastigotes make an ideal choice for high throughput drug screening for antileishmanial compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Ashutosh, Sundar S, Goyal N (2007) Molecular mechanisms of antimony resistance in Leishmania. J Med Microbiol 56:143–153

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashutosh, Gupta S, Ramesh et al (2005) Use of Leishmania donovani field isolates expressing the luciferase reporter gene in in vitro drug screening. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:3776–3783

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Batra S, Bhaduri AP, Joshi BS et al (2001) Syntheses and biological evaluation of alkanediamines as antioxidant and hypolipidemic agents. Bioorg Med Chem 9:3093–3099

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Batra S, Roy AK, Patra A et al (2004) Baylis–Hillman reaction assisted parallel synthesis of 3,5 disubstituted isoxazoles and their in vivo bioevaluation as antithrombotic agents. Bioorg Med Chem 12:2059–2077

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berman JD, Wyler DJ (1980) An in vitro model for investigation of chemotherapeutic agents in leishmaniasis. J Infect Dis 142:83–86

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Callahan HL, Portal AC, Devereaux R et al (1997) An axenic amastigote system for drug screening. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:818–822

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Muylder G, Ang KK, Chen S et al (2011) A screen against Leishmania intracellular amastigotes: comparison to a promastigote screen and identification of a host cell-specific hit. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5:e1253

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Debrabant A, Gottlieb M, Dwyer DM (1995) Isolation and characterization of the gene encoding the surface membrane 3′-nucleotidase/nuclease of Leishmania donovani. Mol Biochem Parasitol 71:51–63

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Debrabant A, Joshi MB, Pimenta PF et al (2004) Generation of Leishmania donovani axenic amastigotes: their growth and biological characteristics. Int J Parasitol 34:205–217

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dube A, Gupta R, Singh N (2009) Reporter genes facilitating discovery of drugs targeting protozoan parasites. Trends Parasitol 25:432–439

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gangwar S, Baig MS, Shah P et al (2012) Identification of novel inhibitors of dipeptidylcarboxypeptidase of Leishmania donovani via ligand-based virtual screening and biological evaluation. Chem Biol Drug Des 79:149–156

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerin PJ, Olliaro P, Sundar S et al (2002) Visceral leishmaniasis: current status of control, diagnosis, and treatment, and a proposed research and development agenda. Lancet Infect Dis 2:494–501

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta N, Goyal N, Rastogi AK (2001) In vitro cultivation and characterization of axenic amastigotes of Leishmania. Trends Parasitol 17:150–153

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Karin S, Simon LC (2006) In vitro and in vivo interactions between miltefosine and other antileishmanial drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kedzierski L, Sakthianandeswaren A, Curtis JM et al (2009) Leishmaniasis: current treatment and prospects for new drugs and vaccines. Curr Med Chem 16:599–614

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maltezou HC (2010) Drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis. J Biomed Biotechnol 61:75–81

    Google Scholar 

  17. Molyneux D, Killick-Kendrick R (1987) Morphology ultrastructure and lifecycles In: the Leishmaniases. Biol med 1:121–176

    Google Scholar 

  18. Monte-Alegre A, Quaissi A, Sereno D (2006) Leishmania amastigotes as targets for drug screening. Kineto Bio Dis 23:5–6

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moore EM, Lockwood DN (2010) Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. J Glob Infect Dis 2:151–158

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Neal RA (1987) The leishmaniasis in biology and medicine. In: Peters W, Killick-Kendrick R (eds) Experimental chemotherapy II. Academic Press, London, pp 793–845

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sereno D, da Silva AC, Mathieu-Daude F et al (2007) Advances and perspective in Leishmania cell based drug screening procedures. Parasitol Int 58:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sereno D, Roy G, Lemesre JL et al (2001) DNA transformation of Leishmania infantum axenic amastigotes and their use in drug screening. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:1168–1173

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shaked-Mishan P, Ulrich N, Ephros M et al (2001) Novel intracellular SbV reducing activity correlates with antimony susceptibility in Leishmania donovani. J Biol Chem 276:3971–3976

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh N, Gupta R, Jaiswal AK et al (2009) Transgenic Leishmania donovani clinical isolates expressing green fluorescent protein constitutively for rapid and reliable ex vivo drug screening. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:370–374

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sundar S (2001) Drug resistance in Indian visceral leishmaniasis. Trop Med Int Health 6:849–854

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vermeersch M, da Luz RI, Toté K et al (2009) In vitro susceptibilities of Leishmania donovani promastigote and amastigote stages to antileishmanial reference drugs: practical relevance of stage-specific differences. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3855–3859

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zilberstein D, Shapira M (1994) The role of pH and temperature in the development of Leishmania parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol 48:449–470

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an in-house grant (SIP 0026) of the Central Drug Research Institute. We gratefully acknowledge CSIR for financial support to Ravinder. The manuscript carries CDRI communication no 8289.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neena Goyal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ravinder, Bhaskar, Gangwar, S. et al. Development of Luciferase Expressing Leishmania donovani Axenic Amastigotes as Primary Model for In Vitro Screening of Antileishmanial Compounds. Curr Microbiol 65, 696–700 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-012-0209-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-012-0209-1

Keywords

  • Visceral Leishmaniasis
  • Leishmaniasis
  • Luciferase Expression
  • Miltefosine
  • Antileishmanial Activity