Skip to main content
Log in

Biofilm and Siderophore Effects on Secondary Waste Water Disinfection

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficiency of ultraviolet (UV) light disinfection of wastewater effluent using a large-scale pilot system was studied. The relationship between biofilm and siderophore production and UV doses received by Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain ATCC 15442 was determined. UV decreased pyoverdine production and enhanced biofilm production. Consequently external factors conditioned by both pyoverdine and biofilm may affect the UV effect on bacterial disinfection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ankenbauer R, Sriyosachati S, Cox CD (1985) Effects of siderophores on the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Human Serum and Transferrin. Infect Immun 49:132–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aristoteli LP, Willcox MDP (2003) Mucin degradation mechanisms by distinct Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in vitro. Infect Immun 71:5565–5575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brahmi M, Belhadi NH, Hamdi H, Hassen A (2010) Modeling of secondary treated wastewater disinfection by UV irradiation: effects of suspended solids content. J Environ Sci 22:1218–1224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Briner H, Croal L, Gora K, Tsokos C, Laub M (2010) Novel regulators controlling biofilm formation through the GacS/GacA two-component system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa reports. MURJ 19:46–56

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ceri H, Olson ME, Turner RJ (2010) Needed, new paradigms in antibiotic development. Expert Opin Pharmacother 11:1233–1237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciofu O, Tolker-Nielsen T (2010) Antibiotic tolerance and resistance in biofilms. In: Bjarnsholt T, Moser C, Jensen P, Høiby N (eds) Biofilm infections. Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp 215–229

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Decho AW (1990) Microbial exopolymer secretions in ocean environments: their role(s) in food webs and marine processes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 28:73–153

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fallahzadeh V, Ahmadzadeh M, Sharifi R (2010) Growth and pyoverdine production kinetics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 in an experimental fermentor. J Agric Technol 6:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grecz N, Rowley DB, Matsuyama A (1983) The effect of irradiation on bacteria and viruses. In: Josephson ES, Peterson MS (eds) Preservation of food by ionizing radiation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 167

    Google Scholar 

  10. Griffin M, Engler AJ, Barber T, Healy K, Sweeney HL, Discher D (2004) Patterning, prestress and peeling dynamics of myocytes. Biophys J 86:1209–1222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrison J, Ceri H, Yerly J, Stremick CA, Hu Y, Martinuzzi R, Turner RJ (2006) The use of microscopy and three-dimensional visualization to evaluate the structure of microbial biofilms cultivated in the calgary biofilm device. Biomed Life Sci 8:194–215

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hassen A, Mahrouk M, Ouzari H, Cherif M, Boudabous A, Damelincourt J (2000) UV disinfection of treated wastewater in a large scale pilot plant and inactivation of selected bacteria in a laboratory UV device. Bioresour Technol 74:141–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kavamura VN, Esposito E (2010) Biotechnological strategies applied to the decontamination of soils polluted with heavy metals. Biotechnol Adv 28:61–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kipnis E, Sawa T, Wiener-Kronish J (2006) Targeting mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis Thérapeutiques ciblant les mécanismes pathogéniques de Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Médecine et maladies infectieuses 36:78–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knobloch JKM, Bartscht K, Sabottke A, Rohde H, Feucht HH, Mack D (2001) Biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis depends on RsbU, a functional activator of the sigB operon: differential activation mechanisms due to ethanol and salt stress. J Bacteriol 183:2624–2633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mack D, Bartscht K, Fischer C, Rohde H, de Grahl C, Dobinsky S, Horstkotte MA, Kiel K, KM Knobloch J (2001) Genetic and biochemical analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm accumulation. Methods Enzymol 336:215–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer JM, Abdallah MA (1978) The fluorescent pigment of Pseudomonas fluorescens: biosynthesis, purification and physicochemical properties. J Gen Microbiol 107:319–328

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller RV, Kokjohn TA (1990) General microbiology of recA: environmental and evolutionary significance. Annu Rev Microbiol 44:365–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moeller R, Horneck G, Facius R, Stackebrandt E (2005) Role of pigmentation in protecting Bacillus sp. endospores against environmental UV radiation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51:231–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Myklestad S, Haug A, Larsen B (1972) Production of carbohydrates by the marine diatom Chaeotoceros affinis var. willei (Gran) Hustedt. 11. Preliminary investigation of the extracellular polysaccharide. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 9:137–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolella C, Van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (2000) Wastewater treatment with particulate biofilm reactors. J Biotechnol 80:1–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Parker JA, Darby JL (1995) Particle-associated coliform in secondary effluents: shielding from ultraviolet light disinfection. Water Environ Res 67:1065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Spoering AL MS (2006) Gilmore quorum sensing and DNA release in bacterial biofilms. Curr Opin Microbiol 9:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Süß J, Volz S, Obst Uand Schwartz T (2009) Application of a molecular biology concept for the detection of DNA damage and repair during UV disinfection. Water Res 43:3705–3716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wimpenn JWT (2000) An overview of biofilms as functional communities. In: Allison DG, Gilbert HMLappin-Scott P, Wilson M (eds) Community structure and co operation in biofilms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the European Union (Avicenna Project No. 93AVI054. Authors are grateful for Centre National Universitaire de Documentation Scientifique et Technique (CNUDST) particularly to Mr. Ahmed El Amri and Mrs. Asma Riahi. We are also grateful to Prof. Ann C. Kennedy for her assistance in revision and improvement of manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Saidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saidi, N., Kouki, S., Mehri, I. et al. Biofilm and Siderophore Effects on Secondary Waste Water Disinfection. Curr Microbiol 63, 337 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-011-9983-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-011-9983-4

Keywords

Navigation