Dairy Farm Age and Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents in Escherichia coli Isolated from Dairy Topsoil
Antimicrobial agent usage is common in animal agriculture for therapeutic and prophylactic purposes. Selective pressure exerted by these antimicrobials on soil bacteria could result in the selection of strains that are resistant due to chromosomal- or plasmid-derived genetic components. Multiple antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli and the direct relationship between antimicrobial agent use over time has been extensively studied, yet the relationship between the age of an animal agriculture environment such as a dairy farm and antibiotic resistance remains unclear. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that antimicrobial-resistance profiles of E. coli isolated from dairy farm topsoil correlate with dairy farm age. E. coli isolated from eleven dairy farms of varying ages within Roosevelt County, NM were used for MIC determinations to chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid, penicillin, tetracycline, ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, gentamicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, cefotaxime, and ciprofloxacin. The minimum inhibitory concentration values of four antibiotics ranged 0.75 to >256 μg/ml, 1 to >256 μg/ml, 12 to >256 μg/ml, and 0.75 to >256 μg/ml for chloramphenicol, nalidixic acid, penicillin, and tetracycline, respectively. The study did not show a direct relationship between antibiotic resistance and the age of dairy farms.
KeywordsCefotaxime Dairy Cattle Nalidixic Acid Dairy Farm Gatifloxacin
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants 1 R15 GM070562-01 and P20 RR016480, the latter of which is from the NM-INBRE program of the National Center for Research Resources, a contribution from Calton Research Associates in honor of George and Clytie Calton, and an Internal Research Grant from ENMU.
- 6.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2006) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard-seventh edition CLSI document M7-A7, vol 26, No. 226, No. 2Google Scholar
- 11.Gavalchin J, Katz SE (1994) The persistence of fecal-borne antibiotics in soil. J AOAC Int 77:481–485Google Scholar
- 14.Hanzawa T, Oka C, Ishiguru N, Sato G (1984) Antibiotic-resistant coliforms in the waste of piggeries and dairy farms. Jpn J Vet Sci 46:363–372Google Scholar
- 16.Itoh F, Ogino T, Itoh K, Watanabe H (1992) Differentiation and detection of pathogenic determinants among diarrheagenic Escherichia coli by polymerase chain reaction using mixed primers. Jpn J Clin Med 50:343–347Google Scholar
- 19.Murray PR, Rosenthal K, Kobayashi G, Pfaller M (2005) Antibacterial agents. In: Schmitt W, Miller K (eds) Medical microbiology, 5th edn. Elsevier Mosby, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 22.Peng Y, Hernandez RL, Crow RR, Jones SE, Mathews SA, Arnold AM, Castillo EF, Moseley JM, Varela MF (2008) Pasteurized whole milk confers reduced susceptibilities to the antimicrobial agents trimethoprim, gatifloxacin, cefotaxime, and tetracycline via the marCRAB locus in Escherichia coli. J Dairy Res 75:491–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar