Skip to main content
Log in

Cloning and Characterization of a Novel tuf Promoter from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL1403

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic engineering of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) requires a reliable gene expression system. Especially, a stable promoter is an important genetic element to induce gene expression in such a system. We report on a novel tuf promoter (Ptuf) of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 that was screened and selected through analysis of previously published microarray data. Ptuf activity was examined and compared with three other known lactococcal promoters (PdnaJ, PpfkA, and Pusp45) using different bacteria as expression hosts. Each promoter was, respectively, fused to the promoterless and modified bmpB gene as a reporter, and we estimated promoter activity through BmpB expression. All promoters were active in IL1403, and Ptuf activity was strongest among them. The activity of each promoter differed by host bacteria (Lactobacillus plantarum Lb25, Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC23272, and Escherichia coli Top10F’). Ptuf had the highest activity in IL1403 when growth reached late log phase. The activity of each promoter correlated with the expression of each cognate gene in the microarray data (R 2 = 0.7186, P = 0.06968). This study revealed that novel food-grade promoters such as IL1403 Ptuf can be selected from microarray data for food-grade microorganisms and Ptuf can be used to develop a reliable gene expression system in L. lactis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alegre MT, Rodríguez MC, Mesas JM (2004) Transformation of Lactobacillus plantarum by electroporation with in vitro modified plasmid DNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 241:73–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bermúdez-Humarán LG (2009) Lactococcus lactis as a live vector for mucosal delivery of therapeutic proteins. Hum Vaccin 5:4

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bron PA, Hoffer SM, Van Swam II et al (2004) Selection and characterization of conditionally active promoters in Lactobacillus plantarum, using alanine racemase as a promoter probe. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:310–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Y-S, Steele JL (2005) Analysis of promoter sequences from Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32 and their activity in other lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 98:64–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen DPA, Renes J, Bouwman FG et al (2006) Proteomic analysis of log to stationary growth phase Lactobacillus plantarum cells and a 2-DE database. Proteomics 6:6485–6493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Djordjevic G, Klaenhammer T (1998) Inducible gene expression systems in Lactococcus lactis. Mol Biotechnol 9:127–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guillot A, Gitton C, Anglade P et al (2003) Proteomic analysis of Lactococcus lactis, a lactic acid bacterium. Proteomics 3:337–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeong DW, Chul Choi Y, Min Lee J et al (2006) Isolation and characterization of promoters from Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris LM0230. Food Microbiol 23:82–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim SH (2008) Effects of a M cell targeting peptide, CKSTHPLSC, on antigen delivery in small intestine using BmpB as fusion model antigen. Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University

  10. La T, Phillips ND, Reichel MP et al (2004) Protection of pigs from swine dysentery by vaccination with recombinant BmpB, a 29.7 kDa outer-membrane lipoprotein of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae. Vet Microbiol 102:97–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu C-Q, Su P, Khunajakr N et al (2005) Development of food-grade cloning and expression vectors for Lactococcus lactis. J Appl Microbiol 98:127–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morelli L, Vogensen FK, and Wright AV (2004) Genetics of lactic acid bacteria. In: Lactic acid bacteria: microbiological and functional aspects, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, NY, USA, pp 249–294

  13. Morello E, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Llull D et al (2008) Lactococcus lactis, an efficient cell factory for recombinant protein production and secretion. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 14:48–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beyer NH, Roepstorff P, Hammer K et al (2003) Proteome analysis of the purine stimulon from Lactococcus lactis. Proteomics 3:786–797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nouaille S, Ribeiro LA, Miyoshi A et al (2003) Heterologous protein production and delivery systems for Lactococcus lactis. Genet Mol Res 2:102–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Sullivan DJ, Klaenhammer TR (1993) Rapid mini-prep isolation of high-quality plasmid DNA from Lactococcus and Lactobacillus spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:2730–2733

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Redon E, Loubiere P, Cocaign-Bousquet M (2005) Role of mRNA stability during genome-wide adaptation of Lactococcus lactis to carbon starvation. J Biol Chem 280:36380–36385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen L, Shi Y, Douglas AL et al (2000) Identification and characterization of promoters regulating tuf expression in Chlamydia trachomatis serovar F. Arch Biochem Biophys 379:46–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Simon D, Chopin A (1988) Construction of a vector plasmid family and its use for molecular cloning in Streptococcus lactis. Biochimie 70:559–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Solem C, Jensen PR (2002) Modulation of gene expression made easy. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2397–2403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Steidler L, Rottiers P (2006) Therapeutic drug delivery by genetically modified Lactococcus lactis. Ann NY Acad Sci 1072:176–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Team RDC (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing

  23. Teuber M, Geis A (2006) The genus Lactococcus. In: The prokaryotes. Springer, NY, pp 205–228

  24. van Asseldonk M, de Vos WM, Simons G (1993) Functional analysis of the Lactococcus lactis usp45 secretion signal in the secretion of a homologous proteinase and a heterologous alpha-amylase. Mol Gen Genet 240:428–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ventura M, Canchaya C, Meylan V et al (2003) Analysis, characterization, and loci of the tuf genes in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species and their direct application for species identification. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6908–6922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wells JM, Mercenier A (2008) Mucosal delivery of therapeutic and prophylactic molecules using lactic acid bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:349–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yun JH, Lee KB, Sung YK et al (2008) Isolation and characterization of potential probiotic lactobacilli from pig feces. J Basic Microbiol 48:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a graduate fellowship from the BK 21 project and the Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University. We thank Dr. Alain Chopin (Laboratoire de Génétique Microbienne, France) and Takashi Sasaki (Meiji Dairies Corporation, Japan) for providing the pIL252 vector and the IL1403 strain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Jaie Choi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 71 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, E.B., Piao, D.C., Son, J.S. et al. Cloning and Characterization of a Novel tuf Promoter from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL1403. Curr Microbiol 59, 425–431 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9455-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9455-2

Keywords

Navigation