Skip to main content
Log in

Vadose Zone Microbial Biobarriers Remove Nitrate from Percolating Groundwater

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbial biobarriers are an established technique for cleansing contaminants from aquifers. This study evaluated their use under well-drained conditions within the vadose or unsaturated zone. Three sets of sand filled columns, the positive control, field-capacity, and sub-field-capacity groups, contained biobarriers formed by mixing sand with sawdust and soybean oil. The biobarriers were positioned 1 m from the top of the 145 cm columns. A fourth set of column, the negative control, contained no biobarrier. The positive control group’s biobarriers were saturated while biobarriers in the other groups were allowed to drain. At intervals water containing 20 mg l−1 NO 3 –N was applied to the columns, the water was allowed to percolate through the columns, and the effluents were collected and analyzed. The biobarriers were highly effective at removing NO 3 . NO 3 –N in the effluents from the field-capacity, sub-field-capacity, and positive control groups averaged 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.6 ± 0.1, and 0.8 ± 0.1 mg l−1, respectively, during the final weeks of the study while effluents from the negative control group averaged 17.9 ± 0.4 mg l−1. The barriers removed NO 3 even when the water content was in the 20–40% pore filled space range. During the 12-week study the field-capacity barriers lost 5.6% of their organic content while those in the sub-field-capacity group lost no detectable organic matter indicating that the barriers contained sufficient substrate to last for several years. Vadose zone biobarriers could provide a useful means of protecting surface waters and aquifers from NO 3 .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blowes DW, Robertson WD, Ptacek CL, Merkley C (1994) Removal of agricultural nitrate from tile-drainage effluent water using in-line bioreactors. J Contam Hydrol 15:207–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ, Benner SG, McRae CWT, Bennett TA, Puls RW (2000) Treatment of inorganic contaminants using permeable reactive barriers. J Contam Hydrol 45:123–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron J 54:464–465

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flere JM, Zhang TC (1999) Nitrate removal with sulfur-limestone autotrophic denitrification processes. J Environ Eng 125:721–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilbert O, Pomierny S, Rowe I, Kalin RM (2008) Selection of organic substrates as potential reactive materials for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB). Bioresource Technol 99:7587–7596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenburg AE, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD (eds) (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. Sect. 8010 C. Basic requirements for toxicity tests. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environmental Federation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter WJ (2001) Use of vegetable oil in a pilot-scale denitrifying wall. J Contam Hydrol 53:119–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunter WJ (2002) Bioremediation of chlorate or perchlorate contaminated water using permeable barriers containing vegetable oil. Curr Microbiol 45:287–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunter WJ (2003) Accumulation of nitrite in denitrifying barriers when phosphate is limiting. J Contam Hydrol 66:79–919

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunter WJ (2007) An Azospira oryzae (syn Dechlorosoma suillum) strain that reduces selenate and selenite to elemental red selenium. Curr Microbiol 54:376–381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunter WJ (2008) Remediation of drinking water for rural populations. In: Follett RF, Hatfield JL (eds) Nitrogen in the environment: sources, problems and management. Elsevier Science BV, Holland, pp 597–621

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter WJ, Follett RF, Cary JW (1997) Use of vegetable oil to stimulate denitrification and remove nitrate from flowing water. Trans ASAE (Am Soc Agric Eng) 40:345–353

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hunter WJ, Kuykendall LD (2005) Removing selenite from groundwater with an in situ biobarrier: laboratory studies. Curr Microbiol 50:145–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan AR, Chandra D, Quraishi S, Sinha RK (2000) Soil aeration under different soil surface conditions. J Agric Crop Sci 185(74):105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee MD, Buchanan RJ Jr, Ellis DE (2000) Laboratory studies using edible oils to support reductive dechlorination. In: Wickranayake GB, Gavaskar AR, Alleman BC, Magar VS (eds) Bioremediation and phytoremediation of chlorinated and recalcitrant compounds. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, pp 47–53

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merrill AG, Benning TL (2006) Ecosystem type differences in nitrogen process rates and controls in the riparian zone of a montane landscape. For Ecol Manage 222:145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Myrold DD, Tiedje JM (1985) Establishment of denitrification capacity in soil: effects of carbon, nitrate and moisture. Soil Biol Biochem 17:819–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Penman HL (1940) Gas and vapor movements in the soil. J Agric Sci 30:570–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Robertson WD, Cherry JA (1995) In situ denitrification of septic-system nitrate using reactive porous media barriers: field trials. Ground Water 33:99–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson WD, Anderson MR (1999) Nitrogen removal from landfill leachate using an infiltration bed coupled with a denitrification barrier. Ground Water Monit R 19:73–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Robertson WD, Ptacek CJ, Brown SJ (2007) Aquifer nitrate and perchlorate remediation using a wood particle layer. Ground Water Monit R 27:85–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Robertson WD, Vogan JL, Lombardo PS (2008) Nitrate removal rates in a 15-year-old permeable reactive barrier treating septic system nitrate. Ground Water Monit R 28:65–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schipper LA, Vojvodic-Vukovic M (2001) Five years of nitrate removal, denitrification and carbon dynamics in a denitrification wall. Water Res 35:3473–3477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schipper LA, McGill A (2008) Nitrogen transformation in a denitrification layer irrigated with dairy factory effluent. Water Res 42:2457–2464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Seo Y, Jang A, Bishop P (2007) Organic mulch biowall for PAH contaminated groundwater remediation. Eur J Soil Biol 43:304–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stolzey LH, Letey J (1964) Characterizing soil oxygen conditions with platinum electrode. Adv Agron 16:249–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Su C, Puls RW (2006) Removal of added nitrate in cotton burr compost, mulch compost, and peat: mechanisms and potential use for groundwater nitrate remediation. Chemosphere 66:91–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Robin Montenieri and Kimberly LaCroix for their expert technical assistance. Manufacturer and product brand names are given for the reader’s convenience and do not reflect endorsement by the US government. This article was the work of US government employees engaged in official duties and is exempt from copyright.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William J. Hunter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunter, W.J. Vadose Zone Microbial Biobarriers Remove Nitrate from Percolating Groundwater. Curr Microbiol 58, 622–627 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9380-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9380-4

Keywords

Navigation