Skip to main content
Log in

High-Level Expression in Escherichia coli, Purification and Mosquito-Larvicidal Activity of the Binary Toxin from Bacillus sphaericus

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mosquito-larvicidal binary toxin produced by Bacillus sphaericus consists of two polypeptides: BinA and BinB. Both proteins function together, and maximum toxicity is obtained when both are present in equimolar ratio. Cloning and expression of each component separately in heterologous hosts led to low toxicity of the crystal proteins. To improve the expression level, the purification process, and the activity of the binary toxin, the binA and binB genes were separately cloned in Eschericia coli. Each gene was fused in frame to the glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene to be expressed as GST-fusion protein (GST-BinA and GST-BinB). A high expression level was observed from both constructs, and the fusion proteins exhibited high toxicity to Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. High-purity toxin could be obtained by affinity chromatography. The result suggests that GST moiety facilitates high protein production and enables better solubility of the toxin inclusions inside the larval gut, leading to higher toxicity of the fusion protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Porter AG, Davidson EW, Liu JW (1993) Mosquitocidal toxins of bacilli and their genetic manipulation for effective biological control of mosquitoes. Microbiol Rev 57:838–861

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Charles JF, Nielson-LeRoux C, Delecluse A (1996) Bacillus sphaericus toxins: Molecular biology and mode of action. Annu Rev Entomol 41:451–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen-Leroux C, Charles JF (1992) Binding of Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin to a specific receptor on midgut brush-border membranes from mosquito larvae. Eur J Biochem 210:585–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cokmus C, Davidson EW, Cooper K (1997) Electrophysiological effects of Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin on cultured mosquito cells. J Invertebr Pathol 69:197–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oei C, Hindley J, Berry C (1992) Binding of purified Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin and its deletion derivatives to Culex quinquefasciatus gut: elucidation of functional binding domains. J Gen Microbiol 138:1515–1526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumann L, Broadwell AH, Baumann P (1988) Sequence analysis of the mosquitocidal toxin genes encoding 51.4- and 41.9-kilodalton proteins from Bacillus sphaericus 2362 and 2297. J Bacteriol 170:2045–2050

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van RJ et al (1998) Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:775–806

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. de quino Priest FG MM, Priest FG (2000) Construction of chromosomal integrants of Bacillus sphaericus 2362 by conjugation with Escherichia coli. Res Microbiol 151:547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu X, Yan G, Kong R et al (2000) Analysis of expression of the binary toxin genes from Bacillus sphaericus in Anabaena and the potential in mosquito control. Curr Microbiol 41:352–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Khampang P, Luxananil P, Tanapongpipat S et al (2001) Recombinant Enterobacter amnigenus highly toxic to Anopheles dirus mosquito larvae. Curr Microbiol 43:448–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Promdonkoy B, Promdonkoy P, Audtho M et al (2003) Efficient expression of the mosquito larvicidal binary toxin gene from Bacillus sphaericus in Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol 47:383–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Park HW, Bideshi DK, Federici BA (2003) Recombinant strain of Bacillus thuringiensis producing Cyt1A, Cry11B, and the Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1331–1334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heo MA, Kim SH, Kim SY et al (2006) Functional expression of single-chain variable fragment antibody against c-Met in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 47:203–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang CJ, Chen CY (2005) High-level expression and characterization of two chitinases, ChiCH and ChiCW, of Bacillus cereus 28-9 in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 327:8–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeong MS, Park JS, Jang SB (2007) Cloning, overexpression, purification, and characterization of receptor-interacting protein 3 truncation in Escherichia coli. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 141:175–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boonserm P, Moonsom S, Boonchoy C et al (2006) Association of the components of the binary toxin from Bacillus sphaericus in solution and with model lipid bilayers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 342:1273–1278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Promdonkoy B, Chewawiwat N, Tanapongpipat S et al (2003) Cloning and characterization of a cytolytic and mosquito larvicidal delta-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. darmstadiensis. Curr Microbiol 46:94–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Finney D (1971) Probit analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yuan Z, Rang C, Maroun RC et al (2001) Identification and molecular structural prediction analysis of a toxicity determinant in the Bacillus sphaericus crystal larvicidal toxin. Eur J Biochem 268:2751–2760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Berry C, Hindley J, Ehrhardt AF et al (1993) Genetic determinants of host ranges of Bacillus sphaericus mosquito larvicidal toxins. J Bacteriol 175:510–518

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolas L, Nielsen-Leroux C, Charles JF et al (1993) Respective role of the 42- and 51-kDa components of the Bacillus sphaericus toxin overexpressed in Bacillus thuringiensis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 106:275–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith AW, Camara-Artigas A, Brune DC et al (2005) Implications of high-molecular-weight oligomers of the binary toxin from Bacillus sphaericus. J Invertebr Pathol 88:27–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Promdonkoy B, Pathaichindachote W, Krittanai C et al (2004) Trp132, Trp154, and Trp157 are essential for folding and activity of a Cyt toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 317:744–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF), the National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand and the Commission on Higher Education, Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boonhiang Promdonkoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Promdonkoy, B., Promdonkoy, P. & Panyim, S. High-Level Expression in Escherichia coli, Purification and Mosquito-Larvicidal Activity of the Binary Toxin from Bacillus sphaericus . Curr Microbiol 57, 626–630 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9254-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9254-1

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Boonhiang Promdonkoy