Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing \(a^b\) and \(b^a\) via Location of Zeros

  • Article
  • Published:
The Mathematical Intelligencer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.

References

  1. B. Chakraborty. A visual proof that \(b^a < a^b\) when \(e \le a < b\). International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2102547.

  2. R. M. Corless, G. H. Gonnet, et al. On the Lambert \(W\) function. Advances in Computational Mathematics 5 (1996), 329–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02124750.

  3. L. Euler. De serie lambertina plurimisque eius insignibus proprietatibus. Acta Academiae Scientarum Imperialis Petropolitinae 2 (1783), 29–51.

  4. C. D. Gallant. Proof without words: comparing \(b^a\) and \(a^b\) for \(a<b\). Mathematics Magazine 64:1 (1991), 31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.1991.11977569.

  5. N. Haque and Á. Plaza. Proving inequalities via definite integration: a visual approach. Mathematical Gazette 107:568 (2023), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/mag.2023.20.

  6. S. Janson, D. E. Knuth, T. Luczak, and B. G. Pittel. The birth of the giant component. Random Struct. Algorithms 4 (1993), 233–359.

  7. J. H. Lambert. Observationes varie in mathesin puram. Acta Helvetica, Physico-Mathematico-Anatomico-Botanico-Medica 3 (1758), 128–168.

  8. R. Nelsen. Cameos for Calculus: Visualization in the First-Year Course. Mathematical Association of America, 2015. https://doi.org/10.5948/UPO9781614441205.

  9. J. Rosendahl. Comparing \(b^a\) and \(a^b\) for \(a>b\). College Mathematics Journal 18:1 (1987), 50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.1987.11973008.

  10. J. Steiner. Über das größte Product der Theile oder Summanden jeder Zahl. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 40 (1850), 208.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous reviewer for suggestions toward the improvement of the presentation of this paper. This work is a part of Nazrul Haque’s MSc thesis, conducted under the supervision of Dr. Bikash Chakraborty. Nazrul conveys sincere appreciation to his parents, Amina Khatun and Bashirul Haque, for their unwavering support and boundless confidence in his abilities. Bikash Chakraborty acknowledges the backing received from the Department of Higher Education, Science and Technology, and Biotechnology, Government of West Bengal, as per the sanction order number 1303(sanc.)/STBT-11012(26)/17/2021-ST SEC, dated 14/03/2022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Centenary College, Rahara, North 24 Pargana, Calcutta, 700118, India

    Nazrul Haque & Bikash Chakraborty

Authors
  1. Nazrul Haque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bikash Chakraborty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazrul Haque.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haque, N., Chakraborty, B. Comparing \(a^b\) and \(b^a\) via Location of Zeros. Math Intelligencer (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-024-10342-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-024-10342-5

Search

Navigation