Skip to main content
Log in

Women’s Representation in Mathematics Subfields: Evidence from the arXiv

The Mathematical Intelligencer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions


  1. O. Aslund and O. N. Skans. Do anonymous job application procedures level the playing field? Working Paper, IFAUInstitute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, 2007.

  2. Association for Women in Mathematics, AWM ADVANCE.

  3. L. Behaghel, B. Crepon, and T. Le Barbanchon. Unintended effects of anonymous resumes. Discussion Paper, IZAInstitute for the Study of Labor, 2014.

  4. Andrew J. Bernoff and Ursula Whitcher. Measuring Gender Representation on Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences. SIAM News, November 2016.

  5. Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. 2006.

  6. F. Connolly, J. A. Gallian, What Students Say About Their REU Experience, in Proceedings of the Conference on Promoting Undergraduate Research in Mathematics, Providence: American Mathematical Society, 2007, pp. 233–236.

  7. Kristine K. Fowler, Mathematicians’ Views on Current Publishing Issues: A Survey of Researchers. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Fall 2011.

  8. Richard B. Freeman and Wei Huang, Collaborating with People Like Me: Ethnic Coauthorship within the United States. Journal of Labor Economics 33, no. S1 (Part 2, July 2015): S289–S318.

  9. Paul Ginsparg, It was twenty years ago today... Preprint, 2011.

  10. Judy Green and Jeanne LaDuke, Pioneering Women in American Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 2009.

  11. Catherine Hobbs and Esmyr Koomen, Statistics on women in mathematics. Preprint, 2006.

  12. Janet S. Hyde and Janet E. Mertz. Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009.

  13. Allyn Jackson. From preprints to e-prints: The rise of electronic preprint servers in Mathematics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 2002.

  14. Joint Economic Committee, US Congress, STEM Education: Preparing for the Jobs of the Future.

  15. Vincent Lariviere, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Benoit Macaluso, Stasa Milojevic, Blaise Cronin, and Mike Thelwall, arXiv e-prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships. Preprint, 2013.

  16. Kristin Lauter, President’s Report. AWM Newsletter. May–June 2016.

  17. Sarah-Jane Leslie, Andrei Cimpian, Meredith Meyer, and Edward Freeland, Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 16 January 2015: Vol. 347, no. 6219, pp. 262–265.

  18. Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher, Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.

  19. Greg Martin, Addressing the underrepresentation of women in mathematics conferences. Preprint, 2015.

  20. Helena Mihaljević-Brandt, Lucía Santamaría, and Marco Tullney, The Effect of Gender in the Publication Patterns in Mathematics. PLOS One October 25, 2016.

  21. Margaret Anne Marie Murray, Women Becoming Mathematicians: Creating a Professional Identity in Post-World War II America. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.

  22. National Science and Technology Council, Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: 5-Year Strategic Plan.

  23. National Science Board, Revisiting the STEM Workforce, 2015.

  24. National Science Foundation, Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: Data Tables. January 1, 2015.

  25. Emma Pierson, In Science, It Matters That Women Come Last FiveThirtyEight Aug. 5, 2014.

  26. Emma Pierson, Are Female Scientists Hiding? FiveThirtyEight Aug. 5, 2014.

  27. Anaand Prasad, Conference Diversity Distribution Calculator.

  28. Londa Schiebinger and Martina Schraudner, Interdisciplinary approaches to achieving gendered innovations in science, medicine, and engineering. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 36 (2) (2011), 154–167.

  29. Saharon Shelah, Shelah’s Archive.

  30. Yuri Shimizu, The topological proof of the Poincare conjecture. Preprint, 2015.

  31. S. J. Spencer, C. M. Steele, and D. Q. Quinn, Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35:4–28, 1999.

  32. F. L. Smyth and B. A. Nosek, On the gender-science stereotypes held by scientists: Explicit accord with gender-ratios, implicit accord with scientific identity. Frontiers in Psychology 6:415, 2015.

  33. Chad M. Topaz and Shilad Sen, Gender Representation on Journal Editorial Boards in the Mathematical Sciences. PLOS One, August 2016.

  34. William Yslas Vélez, James W. Maxwell, and Colleen A. Rose, Report on the 2012–2013 New Doctoral Recipients. Notices of the AMS, 61(8) (2014), 874–884.

  35. William Yslas Vélez, James W. Maxwell, and Colleen A. Rose, Fall 2013 Departmental Profile Report. Notices of the AMS, 62(4)(2015), 406–415.

  36. Yanlong Zhou. A New Way to Proof \(3x+1\) Problem. Preprint, 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ursula Whitcher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brisbin, A., Whitcher, U. Women’s Representation in Mathematics Subfields: Evidence from the arXiv. Math Intelligencer 40, 38–49 (2018).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: