Skip to main content
Log in

Differential effects of c-fms and c-kit ligands on the lineage development of the lymphohematopoietic cell line EML C1

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 The lymphohematopoietic progenitors represent <0.01% of nucleated marrow cells. We have shown that murine lymphohematopoietic progenitors can be immortalized by a recombinant retroviral vector harboring a dominant-negative retinoic acid (RA) receptor. The immortalized progenitors proliferate as a stem-cell factor-dependent clonal line designated EML C1. The EML C1 cell line spontaneously generates prepro-B-lymphocytes and erythroid and myeloid progenitors. Upon stimulation with interleukin 7 and marrow stromal cells, the prepro-B-lymphocytes express recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG-1) and undergo D-J rearrangements of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes. With erythropoietin, the erythroid progenitors proliferate and differentiate into red cells. Generation of the common progenitors for neutrophils and macrophages [colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM)] is suppressed in EML C1 cells but is inducible by high concentrations of RA. An additional block in neutrophil differentiation occurs at the promyelocyte stage, but this can also be overcome by high concentrations of RA. Although c-fms is homologous to c-kit, which encodes the receptor for stem-cell factor (SCF), EML C1 cells neither express c-fms nor respond to macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), the ligand for c-fms. Transduction and expression of c-fmscDNA in EML C1 cells confers responsiveness to M-CSF. This finding indicates that c-kit and c-fms share substantially overlapping signal-transduction pathways. However, c-fms-transduced EML C1 cells (EML C1/c-fms cells) exhibit different development patterns when stimulated by SCF alone or by M-CSF alone. When stimulated by SCF alone, EML C1/c-fms cells show mostly erythroid and B-lymphoid development. When stimulated by M-CSF alone, development switches to mostly myeloid (neutrophil and macrophage) development. This observation suggests that c-kit and c-fms must have unique signal-transduction pathways in addition to the common ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, S. Differential effects of c-fms and c-kit ligands on the lineage development of the lymphohematopoietic cell line EML C1. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 38 (Suppl 1), S58–S63 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002800051040

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002800051040

Navigation