Hudis CA (2007) Trastuzumab—mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med 357:39–51
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Buzdar AU, Valero V, Ibrahim NK et al (2007) Neoadjuvant therapy with paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and concurrent trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer: an update of the initial randomized study population and data of additional patients treated with the same regimen. Clin Cancer Res 13:228–233
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet 375:377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61964-4
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Suter TM, Procter M, van Veldhuisen DJ et al (2007) Trastuzumab-associated cardiac adverse effects in the herceptin adjuvant trial. J Clin Oncol 25:3859–3865
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Tolaney SM, Barry WT, Dang CT et al (2015) Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 372:134–141. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1406281
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A et al (2015) Tailoring therapies–improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol 26:1533–1546. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv221
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pegram MD, Lopez A, Konecny G, Slamon DJ (2000) Trastuzumab and chemotherapeutics: drug interactions and synergies. Semin Oncol 27:21–25; discussion 92–100
Inoue K, Nakagami K, Mizutani M (2010) Randomized phase III trial of trastuzumab monotherapy followed by trastuzumab plus docetaxel versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: the JO17360 trial group. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0498-7
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE et al (2011) Sequential versus concurrent trastuzumab in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4491–4497. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.36.7045
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Untch M, Jackisch C, Schneeweiss A et al (2016) Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (GeparSepto-GBG 69): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:345–356
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M et al (2014) Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU et al (2012) Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 30:1796–1804. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595
Article
Google Scholar
Tanaka S, Iwamoto M, Kimura K et al (2015) Phase II study of neoadjuvant anthracycline-based regimens combined with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and trastuzumab for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 15:191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2014.12.003
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Valachis A, Mauri D, Polyzos NP et al (2011) Trastuzumab combined to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 20:485–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.06.009
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Buzdar AU, Suman VJ, Meric-Bernstam F et al (2013) Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-75) followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab versus paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC-75 plus trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (Z1041): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:1317–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70502-3
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J et al (2005) Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1673–1684
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N et al (2011) Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 365:1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0910383
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart MJ et al (2013) 2 years versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer (HERA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 382:1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61094-6
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Niraula S, Gyawali B (2018) Optimal duration of adjuvant trastuzumab in treatment of early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 173:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4967-8
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nagayama A, Hayashida T, Jinno H et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: a network meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:dju203. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju203
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Clavarezza M, Puntoni M, Gennari A et al (2016) Dual block with lapatinib and trastuzumab versus single-agent trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Cancer Res 22:4594–4603. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1881
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Guarneri V, Dieci MV, Frassoldati A et al (2015) Prospective biomarker analysis of the randomized CHER-LOB study evaluating the dual anti-HER2 treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Oncologist 20:1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0138
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Nitz UA, Gluz O, Christgen M et al (2017) De-escalation strategies in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC): final analysis of the WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- phase II trial: efficacy, safety, and predictive markers for 12 weeks of neoadjuvant dual blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab ± weekly paclitaxel. Ann Oncol 28:2768–2772. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx494
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
de Azambuja E, Holmes AP, Piccart-Gebhart M et al (2014) Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): survival outcomes of a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial and their association with pathological complete response. Lancet Oncol 15:1137–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70320-1
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH et al (2016) 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 17:791–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00163-7
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS et al (2019) Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 380:617–628. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1814017
Article
Google Scholar
Peng L, Bu Z, Ye X, Zhou Y, Zhao Q (2017) Incidence and risk of peripheral neuropathy with nab-paclitaxel in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12407
Article
Google Scholar