Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modification of uptake and subcellular distribution of doxorubicin by N-acylhydrazone residues as visualised by intrinsic fluorescence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Doxorubicin (1) is commonly used in the treatment of a wide range of cancers. Some N-acylhydrazones of 1 were previously found to have an improved tumour and organ selectivity. In order to clarify the molecular basis for this effect, the cellular uptake into various cancer cells and the localisation in PtK2 potoroo kidney cells of 1 and its N-acylhydrazones derived from heptadecanoic acid (2) and 11-(menthoxycarbonyl)undecanoic acid (3) were studied drawing on their intrinsic fluorescence.

Methods

The uptake of compounds 13 into human cells of HL-60 leukaemia, 518A2 melanoma, HT-29 colon, and resistant KB-V1/Vbl and MCF-7/Topo breast carcinomas was determined fluorometrically from their residual amounts in the supernatant. Their time-dependent accumulation in PtK2 potoroo kidney cells was visualised by fluorescence microscopy.

Results

The uptake, though not the cytotoxicity, of 2 in multi-drug resistant MCF-7/Topo breast cancer cells was conspicuously greater than that of 1 and 3, probably due to an attractive lipophilic interaction with the lipid-rich membranes of these cells. In non-malignant PtK2 cells, both 1 and 3 accumulated initially in the nuclei. Upon prolonged incubation, their fluorescent metabolites were visualised in lysosomes neighbouring the nuclei. In contrast, conjugate 2 was not observed in the nuclei at any time. After 2 h, it had accumulated in vesicles scattered all over the cells, and upon prolonged incubation, its fluorescent metabolites were concentrated in the cellular membrane.

Conclusions

Long unbranched fatty acyl residues when attached to doxorubicin via a hydrazone can act as lipophilic membrane anchors. This allows an increased uptake of such derivatives into lipid-rich membranes especially of multi-drug resistant cancer cells, a retarded release from there into the cytosol and the eventual storage of their metabolites again in the cell membrane rather than in lysosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robert J (1998) Anthracyclines. In: Grochow LB, Ames MM (eds) A clinician′s guide to chemotherapy, pharmcokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 93–173

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cragg GM, Grothaus PG, Newman DJ (2009) Impact of natural products on developing new anti-cancer agents. Chem Rev 109:3012–3043

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Colucci MA, Moody CJ, Couch GD (2008) Natural and synthetic quinones and their reduction by the quinone reductase enzyme NQO1: from synthetic organic chemistry to compounds with anticancer potential. Org Biomol Chem 6:637–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolton JL, Trush MA, Penning TM, Dryhurst G, Monks TJ (2000) Role of quinones in toxicology. Chem Res Toxicol 13:135–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Minotti G, Menna P, Salvatorelli E, Cairo G, Gianni L (2004) Anthracyclines: molecular advances and pharmacologic developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity. Pharmacol Rev 56:185–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gewirtz DA (1999) A critical evaluation of the mechanisms of action proposed for the antitumor effects of the anthracycline antibiotics adriamycin and daunorubicin. Biochem Pharmacol 57:727–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Effenberger K, Breyer S, Schobert R (2010) Modulation of doxorubicin activity in cancer cells by conjugation with fatty acyl and terpenyl hydrazones. Eur J Med Chem 45:1947–1954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Effenberger K, Breyer S, Ocker M, Schobert R (2010) New doxorubicin N-acyl hydrazones with improved efficacy and cell line specificity show modes of action different from the parent drug. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 48:485–486

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Noël G, Peterson C, Trouet A, Tulkens R (1978) Uptake and subcellular localization of daunorubicin and adriamycin in cultured fibroblasts. Eur J Cancer 14:363–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hurwitz SJ, Terashima M, Mizunuma N, Slapka CA (1997) Vesicular anthracycline accumulation in doxorubicin-selected U-937 cells: participation of lysosomes. Blood 89:3745–3754

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pietrzak M, Wieczorek Z, Stachelska A, Darzynkiewicz Z (2003) Interactions of chlorophyllin with acridine orange, quinacrine mustard and doxorubicin analyzed by light absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. Biophys Chem 104:305–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Szulawska A, Gniazdowski M, Czyz M (2005) Sequence specificity of formaldehyde-mediated covalent binding of anthracycline derivatives to DNA. Biochem Pharmacol 69:7–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karukstis KK, Thompson EHZ, Whiles JA, Rosenfeld RJ (1998) Deciphering the fluorescence signature of daunomycin and doxorubicin. Biophys Chem 73:249–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Du H, Fuh RA, Li J, Corkan A, Lindsey JS (1998) PhotochemCAD: A computer-aided design and research tool in photochemistry. Photochem Photobiol 68:141–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Munnier E, Tewes F, Cohen-Jonathan S, Linassier C, Douziech-Eyrolles L, Marchais H, Soucé M, Hervé K, Dubois P, Chourpa I (2007) On the interaction of doxorubicin with oleate ions: fluorescence spectroscopy and liquid-liquid extraction study. Chem Pharm Bull 55:1006–1010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramu A, Glaubiger D, Magrath IT, Joshi A (1983) Plasma membrane lipid structural order in doxorubicin-sensitive and resistant P388 cells. Cancer Res 43:5533–5537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peetla C, Bhave R, Vijayaraghavalu S, Stine A, Kooijman E, Labhasetwar V (2010) Drug resistance in breast cancer cells: biophysical characterization of and doxorubicin interactions with membrane lipids. Mol Pharm 7(6):2334–2348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu P, Liu R, Sharom FJ (2001) Drug transport by reconstituted P-glycoprotein in proteoliposomes. Effect of substrates and modulators, and dependence on bilayer phase state. Eur J Biochem 268:1687–1697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goormaghtigh E, Chatelain P, Caspers J, Ruysschaert JM (1980) Evidence of a specific complex between adriamycin and negatively charged phospholipids. Biochim Biophys Acta 597:1–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jensen CG, Wilson WR, Bleumink AR (1985) Effects of amsacrine and other DNA-intercalating drugs on nuclear and nucleolar structure in cultured V79 Chinese hamster cells and PtK2 rat kangaroo cells. Cancer Res 45:717–725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for financial support (grant Scho 402/8-3) and Ribosepharm GmbH (Germany) for a free batch of doxorubicin.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Schobert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Effenberger-Neidnicht, K., Breyer, S., Mahal, K. et al. Modification of uptake and subcellular distribution of doxorubicin by N-acylhydrazone residues as visualised by intrinsic fluorescence. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 69, 85–90 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1675-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-011-1675-z

Keywords

Navigation