Skip to main content
Log in

Heterogeneity of epithelial and stromal cells of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in ex vivo chemoresponse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Valid prediction of the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents in individual head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is desirable and might be achieved using ex vivo assays.

Methods

Three biopsies from each of 15 HNSCC were taken, minced and digested by collagenase. The digested HNSCC was added to serial dilutions of either cisplatin (CIS) or docetaxel (DTX), which were prepared under flavin-protecting conditions in ECM-coated microtiterplates. After 72-h incubation, cultures were methanol-fixed and Giemsa-stained. The cutoff concentration (COC; concentration completely suppressing colony formation) for epithelial cells (EC) and stromal cells (SC) was evaluated.

Results

12/15 HNSCC (80%) were evaluable. Despite significant correlation of COC of CIS in respect of colony formation of EC or SC, no significant differences in response of individual HNSCC specimens were found in the t test for paired samples (p > 0.16). The same applied to DTX. However, EC and SC showed heterogeneity in chemoresponses leading to COC variability of more than one titration step in 44.1% (CIS) and 20% of HNSCC (DTX). No significant correlation between the COC of both cell populations was found in HNSCC specimens.

Conclusions

The ex vivo chemoresponse of EC and SC of HNSCC must be analyzed separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright JL, Cobb JP, Gumport SL, Golomb FM, Safadi D (1957) Investigation of the relation between clinical and tissue culture response to chemotherapeutic agents of human cancer. N Engl J Med 257:1207–1211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DiPaolo JA, Dowd JE (1961) Evaluation of inhibition of human tumor tissue by cancer chemotherapeutic drugs with an in vitro test. J Natl Cancer Inst 27:807–815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Courtenay VD, Mills J (1978) An in vitro colony assay for human tumours grown in immune-suppressed mice and treated in vivo with cytotoxic agents. Br J Cancer 37:261–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman AE, Hoffman RM (1986) In vivo-like growth of human tumors in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:2694–2698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vescio RA, Redfern CH, Nelson TJ, Ugoretz S, Stern PH, Hoffmann RM (1987) In vivo-like drug responses of human tumors growing in three-dimensional, gel-supported, primary culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5029–5033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vescio RA, Connors KM, Bordin GM, Robb JA, Youngkin T, Umbreit JN, Hoffmann RM (1990) The distinction of small cell and non-small cell lung cancer by growth in native-state histoculture. Cancer Res 50:6095–6099

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furukawa T, Kubota T, Watanabe M, Takahara T, Yamaguchi H, Kase S, Kodaira S, Ishibiki K, Kitajima M (1992) High in vitro correlation of drug response using sponge-gel-supported three-dimensional histoculture and the MTT end point. Int J Cancer 51:489–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Robbins KT, Varki NM, Storniolo AM, Hoffman H, Hoffman RM (1991) Drug response of head and neck tumors in native-state histoculture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:83–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Von Hoff DD (1990) He’s not going to talk about in vitro predictive assays again, is he? J Natl Cancer Inst 82:96–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dollner R, Granzow C, Werner JA, Dietz A (2004) Is there a role for chemosensitivity tests in head and neck cancer? Onkologie 27:310–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weisenthal LM, Lippman ME (1985) Clonogenic and nonclonogenic in vitro chemosensitivity assays. Cancer Treat Rep 69:615–632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dietz A, Rudat V, Dreyhaupt J, Pritsch M, Hoppe F, Hagen R, Pfreundner L, Schröder U, Eckel H, Hess M, Schröder M, Schneider P, Jens B, Zenner HP, Werner JA, Engenhardt-Cabillic R, Vanselow B, Plinkert P, Niewald M, Kuhnt T, Budach W, Flentje M (2009) Induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by radiotherapy for larynx organ preservation in advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer offers moderate late toxicity outcome (DeLOS-I-trial). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266(8):1291–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rajaraman R, Guernsey DL, Rajaraman MM, Rajaraman SR (2006) Stem cells, senescence, neosis and self-renewal in cancer. Cancer Cell Int 6:25. doi:10.1186/1475-2867-6-25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rajamaran R, Rajaraman MM, Rajaraman SR, Guernsey DL (2005) Neosis: a paradigm of self-renewal in cancer. Cell Biol Int 29:1084–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heuser M, Kopun M, Rittgen W, Granzow C (2005) Cytotoxicity determination without photochemical artifacts. Cancer Lett 223:57–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Granzow C, Kopun M, Kröber T (1995) Riboflavin-mediated photosensitization of Vinca alkaloids distorts drug sensitivity assays. Cancer Res 55:4837–4843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wichmann G, Horn I-S, Boehm A, Mozet C, Tschöp K, Dollner R, Dietz A (2009) Single biopsies from head and neck squamous cell carcinomas are representative regarding the entire tumor’s chemosensitivity to cisplatin and docetaxel. Onkologie 32(5):264–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dietz A, Tschöp K, Wichmann G, Granzow C (2008) Method and kit for the ex vivo evaluation of the response of a tumor to conditions to be tested. US-Provisional Ser. No. 61/044,082

  19. Cabelguenne A, Blons H, Waziers De I, Carnot F, Houllier A-M, Soussi T, Brasnu D, Beaune P, Laccourreye O, Laurent-Puig P (2000) p53 alterations predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective series. J Clin Oncol 18:1465–1473

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fouret P, Temam S, Charlotte F, Lacau-St-Guily J (2002) Tumor stage, node stage, p53 gene status, and bcl-2 protein expression as predictors of tumor response to platin-fluorouracil chemotherapy in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 87:1390–1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoffmann TK, Sonkoly E, Hauser U, Lierop A, Whiteside TL, Klussmann JP, Hafner D, Schuler P, Friebe-Hoffmann U, Scheckenbach K, Erjala K, Gréman R, Schipper J, Bier H, Balz V (2008) Alterations in the p53 pathway and their association with radio- and chemosensitivity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 44(12):1100–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Andrews GA, Xi S, Pomerantz RG, Lin CJ, Gooding WE, Wentzel AL, Wu L, Sidransky D, Grandis JR (2004) Mutation of p53 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma correlates with Bcl-2 expression and increased susceptibility to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Head Neck 26:870–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. American Joint Committee on Cancer: Comparison Guide: Cancer Staging Manual Fifth versus Sixth Edition. http://www.cancerstaging.org/products/ajccguide.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2009

  24. Dollner R, Kopun M, Dietz A, Wiessler M, Granzow C (2002) Chemoreactivity profiling of HNSCC: equipotentiality of platinum compounds and glufosfamide, a novel alkylating agent. Proc Am Assn Cancer Res 43:926–931

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dollner R, Granzow C, Helmke BM, Ruess A, Schad A, Dietz A (2004) The impact of stromal cell contamination on chemosensitivity testing of head and neck carcinoma. Anticancer Res 24:325–331

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Desoize B, Berthiot G, Manot L, Coninx P, Dumont P (1996) Evaluation of a prediction model of cisplatin dose based on total platinum plasma concentration. Eur J Cancer A 32:1734–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bissett D, Setanoians A, Cassidy J, Graham MA, Chadwick GA, Wilson P, Auzannet V, Le Bail N, Kaye SB, Kerr DJ (1993) Phase I and pharmakokinetic study of Taxotere (RP 56976) administered as a 24-h infusion. Cancer Res 53:523–527

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Witz IP, Levy-Nissenbaum O (2006) The tumor microenvironment in the post-PAGET era. Cancer Lett 242:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Freeman AE, Hoffman RM (1986) In vivo-like growth of human tumors in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:2694–2698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dollner R, Granzow C, Neudert M, Dietz A (2006) Ex vivo chemosensitivity of head and neck carcinoma to cytostatic drug combinations. Anticancer Res 26:1651–1655

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Granzow C, Kopun M, Heuser M, Herth F, Becker HD (2004) Chemoresistance of human lung tumor stromal cells. Am Assn Cancer Res 95th Annual Meeting Proc Suppl. abstract LB-82

  32. Hasegawa Y, Goto M, Hanai N, Ijichi K, Adachi M, Terada A, Hyodo I, Ogawa T, Furukawa T (2007) Evaluation of optimal drug concentration in histoculture drug response assay in association with clinical efficacy for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 43:749–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh B, Li R, Xu L, Poluri A, Patel S, Shaha AR, Pfister D, Sherman E, Goberdhan A, Hoffman RM, Shah J (2002) Prediction of survival in patients with head and neck cancer using the histoculture drug response assay. Head Neck 24:437–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mukaida H, Hirabayashi N, Hirai T, Iwata T, Saeki S, Toge T (1991) Significance of freshly cultured fibroblasts from different tissues in promoting cancer cell growth. Int J Cancer 48:423–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang W, Matrisian LM, Holmbeck K, Vick CC, Rosenthal EL (2006) Fibroblast-derived MT1-MMP promotes tumor progression in vitro and in vivo. BMC Cancer 6:52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenthal EL, McCrory A, Talbert M, Carroll W, Magnuson JS, Peters GE (2004) Expression of proteolytic enzymes in head and neck cancer-associated fibroblasts. Arch Otolaryng Head Nack Surg 130:943–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Song Z, Powell WC, Kasahara N, van Bokhoven A, Miller GJ, Roy-Burman P (2000) The effect of fibroblast growth factor 8, isoform b, on the biology of prostata carcinoma cells and their interaction with stromal cells. Cancer Res 60:6730–6736

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Anett Reiche and Grit Müller for their excellent technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Boehm.

Additional information

For the Head and Neck Cancer study group.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horn, IS., Wichmann, G., Mozet, C. et al. Heterogeneity of epithelial and stromal cells of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in ex vivo chemoresponse. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65, 1153–1163 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1124-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1124-4

Keywords

Navigation