Skip to main content
Log in

Conventional salvage chemotherapy vs. high-dose therapy with autografting for recurrent or refractory Hodgkin's disease patients

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 Despite progress that has been made in curing Hodgkin's disease (HD), patients whose first remission is brief and those resistant to first-line chemotherapy still have a poor outcome. We retrospectively reviewed data from 29 patients with HD in first relapse or refractory to first-line chemotherapy. Following failure, all patients received three cycles of ifosfomide, epirubicin, and etoposide (IEV); moreover, 11 patients received a conditioning regimen followed by autografting. Of the 18 patients treated with IEV, eight (44%) are alive; nine died of disease progression, and one died of hematologic toxicity. The 24-month overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and event-free survival (EFS) are 18%, 44%, and 22%, respectively. Of the 11 patients treated with IEV and autografting, ten are alive (90%) and one patient died of progressive disease. The 29-month OS, RFS, and EFS are 91%, 71%, and 56%, respectively. Our results confirm data showing that patients with relapsed or resistant HD achieve a significantly better OS and EFS if treated with high-dose therapy and autografting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: January 28, 1999 / Accepted: July 21, 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anselmo, A., Meloni, G., Cavalieri, E. et al. Conventional salvage chemotherapy vs. high-dose therapy with autografting for recurrent or refractory Hodgkin's disease patients. Ann Hematol 79, 79–82 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002770050014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002770050014

Navigation