Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A real-world pharmacovigilance study investigating the toxicities of histone deacetylase inhibitors

  • Research
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are emerging as promising treatments for hematological malignancies, with potential applications extending to solid tumors in the future. Given their wide-ranging biological effects, there is a pressing need for a thorough understanding of the toxicities linked to HDAC inhibition. In this study, a pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Suspected adverse events linked to HDAC inhibitors were detected through various statistical methodologies, including reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, information component, and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean. Our study findings have illuminated that, among the total reported cases examined, gastrointestinal disorders accounted for 13% patients of the cohort, while lymphatic system disorders comprised 8% cases of the cohort, all of which manifested as adverse events induced by HDAC inhibitors. Importantly, the usage of HDAC inhibitors was found to be associated with incidents of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, respiratory failure, hepatic dysfunction, and acute kidney injury. Romidepsin and belinostat demonstrated more pronounced signals of adverse events compared to panobinostat and vorinostat, emphasizing the need for vigilant monitoring of adverse events in this particular population. Furthermore, atrial fibrillation (clinical priority score of 7 points) emerged as the paramount medical event warranting utmost clinical attention. Eventually, multiple adverse events were observe to emerge within the initial and second months following the initiation of treatment. Vigilant monitoring and supportive care strategies are critical in addressing the toxicities associated with HDAC inhibitors, particularly those concerning cardiotoxicity, respiratory toxicity, renal toxicity, and hepatotoxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AEs:

Adverse events

CTL:

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

EBGM:

Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean

EMA:

European Medicines Agency

FDA:

United States Food and Drug Administration

FAERS:

FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

HDACs:

Histone deacetylases

IC:

Information component

MM:

Multiple myeloma

PTL:

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma

PRR:

Proportional reporting ratio

PT:

Preferred term

ROR:

Reporting odds ratio

SOCs:

System organ classes

References

  1. Shetty MG, Pai P, Deaver RE et al (2021) Histone deacetylase 2 selective inhibitors: a versatile therapeutic strategy as next generation drug target in cancer therapy. Pharmacol Res 170:105695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shvedunova M, Akhtar A (2022) Modulation of cellular processes by histone and non-histone protein acetylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 23:329–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah R (2019) Safety and tolerability of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in oncology. Drug Saf 42:235–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bondarev A, Attwood M, Jonsson J et al (2021) Recent developments of HDAC inhibitors: emerging indications and novel molecules. Br J Clin Pharmacol 87:4577–4597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaefer E, Loaiza-Bonilla A, Juckett M et al (2009) A phase 2 study of vorinostat in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 94:1375–1382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hainsworth JD, Daugaard G, Lesimple T et al (2015) Paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without belinostat as empiric first-line treatment for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a randomized, phase 2 trial. Cancer 121:1654–1661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. San-Miguel JF, Hungria VTM, Yoon S-S et al (2014) Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1195–1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi Y, Dong M, Hong X et al (2015) Results from a multicenter, open-label, pivotal phase II study of chidamide in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol 26:1766–1771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan Y-D, Zhao Y, Zhang C et al (2022) Toxicity spectrum of immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer: a safety analysis from clinical trials and a pharmacovigilance system. EClinicalMedicine 50:101535

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yuan T, Li F, Hou Y et al (2023) Adverse events in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with erdafitinib: a retrospective pharmacovigilance study. Front Pharmacol 14:1266890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Alkabbani W, Gamble J-M (2023) Active-comparator restricted disproportionality analysis for pharmacovigilance signal detection studies of chronic disease medications: an example using sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Br J Clin Pharmacol 89:431–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raschi E, Gatti M, Gelsomino F et al (2020) Lessons to be learnt from real-world studies on immune-related adverse events with checkpoint inhibitors: a clinical perspective from pharmacovigilance. Target Oncol 15:449–466

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Grundmark B, Holmberg L, Garmo H et al (2014) Reducing the noise in signal detection of adverse drug reactions by standardizing the background: a pilot study on analyses of proportional reporting ratios-by-therapeutic area. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 70:627–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gatti M, Antonazzo IC, Diemberger I et al (2021) Adverse events with sacubitril/valsartan in the real world: emerging signals to target preventive strategies from the FDA adverse event reporting system. Eur J Prev Cardiol 28:983–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaucher L, Sabatier P, Katsahian S et al (2023) Pharmacovigilance studies without a priori hypothesis: systematic review highlights inappropriate multiple testing correction procedures. J Clin Epidemiol 162:127–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Falchi L, Ma H, Klein S et al (2021) Combined oral 5-azacytidine and romidepsin are highly effective in patients with PTCL: a multicenter phase 2 study. Blood 137:2161–2170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Du J, Han X, Lin S et al (2021) Efficacy and treatment-related adverse events of romidepsin in PTCL clinical studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med 8:732727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cavenagh JD, Popat R (2018) Optimal management of histone deacetylase inhibitor-related adverse events in patients with multiple myeloma: a focus on panobinostat. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 18:501–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Connor OA, Horwitz S, Masszi T et al (2015) Belinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-Cell lymphoma: results of the pivotal phase II BELIEF (CLN-19) study. J Clin Oncol 33:2492–2499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rai S, Kim WS, Ando K et al (2023) Oral HDAC inhibitor tucidinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: phase IIb results. Haematologica 108:811–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leong DP, Caron F, Hillis C et al (2016) The risk of atrial fibrillation with ibrutinib use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood 128:138–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hahn VS, Zhang KW, Sun L et al (2021) Heart failure with targeted cancer therapies: mechanisms and cardioprotection. Circ Res 128:1576–1593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li P, Ge J, Li H (2020) Lysine acetyltransferases and lysine deacetylases as targets for cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 17:96–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zduniak A, Lévêque E, Perdrix A et al (2022) Cardiovascular outcomes of patients treated for non-Hodgkin lymphoma with first-line doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma 63:3340–3350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng X, Huang M, Zhao W et al (2022) RAGE mediates airway inflammation via the HDAC1 pathway in a toluene diisocyanate-induced murine asthma model. BMC Pulm Med 22:61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chun P (2018) Therapeutic effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors on kidney disease. Arch Pharmacal Res 41:162–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Miura K, Taura K, Kodama Y et al (2008) Hepatitis C virus-induced oxidative stress suppresses hepcidin express ion through increased histone deacetylase activity. Hepatology (Baltimore, MD) 48:1420–1429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou C, Peng S, Lin A et al (2023) Psychiatric disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System ( FAERS) database. EClinicalMedicine 59:101967

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the work of the FAERS database (https://www.fda.gov/).

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (202102080498 to W. Wang).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Wenjie Li & YiMing Fu: Conceptualization, methodology, data curation, software and writing-review & editing. Wei Wang: Funding acquisition, project administration, supervision and validation. The work reported in the paper has been performed by the authors, unless clearly specified in the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

No ethics approval and written consent were needed for the secondary analysis of public data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

(1) Neglected post-marketing research on HDAC inhibitors prompts pharmacovigilance analysis.

(2) Our Study finds gastrointestinal disorders and lymphatic system disorders as major AEs.

(3) HDAC inhibitors link to atrial fibrillation, heart/respiratory failure, hepatic dysfunction, kidney injury.

(4) Romidepsin and belinostat show stronger signals of adverse events; vigilant monitoring imperative.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Fu, Y. & Wang, W. A real-world pharmacovigilance study investigating the toxicities of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Ann Hematol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-05691-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-05691-2

Keywords

Navigation