Abstract
This retrospective study investigated the prognostic role of disease dissemination features (Dmax and Dmaxbsa) measured by 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) patients, comparing their performance with other metabolic parameters. We included 78 patients diagnosed with BL between 2010 and 2022 with an available baseline PET, interim PET/CT (iPET) and end of treatment PET/CT (eotPET) and with a minimum of two 2-[18F]FDG avid lesions present at the baseline scan. Dmax was calculated from the three-dimensional coordinates of the baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) by using LIFEx software; Dmaxbsa was calculated as Dmax normalized for body surface area according to the Du Bois method. We evaluated their effect on metabolic treatment response evaluated by PET, on progression free survival (PFS) and on overall survival (OS). Dmaxbsa was significantly associated with tumor stage, bulky and extranodal disease, MTV and TLG. At a median follow-up of 49 months, the median PFS and OS were 45 and 48 months. Dmax and Dmaxbsa were significantly higher in not complete metabolic response than complete metabolic response group at iPET and eotPET.As far as PFS, parameters including iPET/CT, eotPET/CT outcomes, MTV and TLG showed to be independent prognostic factors while Dmax and Dmaxbsa were not significantly associated with the outcome. Dissemination features, together with eotPET/CT results, MTV and TLG, demonstrated to be significantly correlated with OS. In conclusion, in this study we demonstrated that dissemination features derived by 2[18F]-FDG PET/CT were significantly correlated with response to treatment and long-term outcome, independently from other PET features.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Teras LR, DeSantis CE, Cerhan JR, Morton LM, Jemal A, Flowers CR (2016) 2016 US lymphoid malignancy statistics by World Health Organization subtypes. CA Cancer J Clin 66:443–459
Roschewski M, Staudt LM, Wilson WH (2022) Burkitt’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 387(12):1111–1122. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2025746
Schmitz R, Young RM, Ceribelli M et al (2012) Burkitt lymphoma pathogenesis and therapeutic targets from structural and functional genomics. Nature 490(7418):116–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11378
Grande BM, Gerhard DS, Jiang A et al (2019) Genome-wide discovery of somatic coding and noncoding mutations in pediatric endemic and sporadic Burkitt lymphoma. Blood 133(12):1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-09-871418
Crombie J, LaCasce A (2021) The treatment of Burkitt lymphoma in adults. Blood 137(6):743–750. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019004099
López C, Burkhardt B, Chan JKC et al (2022) Nat Rev Dis Primers 8(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-022-00404-3
Albano D, Bertagna F, Giubbini (2020) R.18F-FDG PET/CT role in Burkitt lymphoma. Clin Transl Imaging 8:39–45
Just PA, Fieschi C, Baillet G et al (2008) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in AIDS-related Burkitt lymphoma. AIDS Patient Care STDS 22:695–700
Zeng W, Lechowicz MJ, Winton E et al (2009) Spectrum of FDG PET/CT findings in Burkitt lymphoma. Clin Nucl Med 4:355–358
Karantanis D, Durski JM, Lowe VJ et al (2012) 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Burkitt’s lymphoma. Eur J Radiol 75:e68–73
Carrillo-Cruz E, Rodrıguez MS, Borrego-Dorado I et al (2015) Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the management of Burkitt lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 94:23–30
Albano D, Bosio G, Re A et al (2018) Metabolic behaviour and prognostic value of early and end of treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in adult Burkitt lymphoma: role of Deauville and IHP criteria. Leuk Lymphoma 3:1–8
Wei WX, Huang JJ, Li WY et al (2015) Prognostic values of interim and post-therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning in adult patients with Burkitt’s lymphoma. Chin J Cancer 2(34):608–613
Albano D, Bosio G, Pagani C et al (2019) Prognostic role of baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in Burkitt lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46:87–96
Cottereau AS, Nioche C, Dirand AS, Clerc J, Morschhauser F, Casasnovas O, Meignan M, Buvat I (2020) 18F-FDG PET dissemination features in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma are Predictive of Outcome. J Nucl Med 61(1):40–45. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229450
Albano D, Treglia G, Dondi F, Calabrò A, Rizzo A, Annunziata S, Guerra L, Morbelli S, Tucci A, Bertagna F (2023) 18F-FDG PET/CT maximum tumor dissemination (Dmax) in lymphoma: a New Prognostic factor? Cancers (Basel). 15(9):2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092494
Hoelzer D, Walewski J, Döhner H, Viardot A, Hiddemann W, Spiekermann K et al (2014) Improved outcome of adult Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia with rituximab and chemotherapy: report of a large prospective multicenter trial. Blood 124:3870–3879
Ferreri AJ, Bruno VM, Donadoni G, Cattaneo C, Fumagalli L, Foppoli M et al (2012) Safety and activity of a new intensive short-term chemoimmunotherapy in HIV-positive patients with Burkitt lymphoma. Br J Haematol 159:252–255
Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJG et al (2015) FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 42(2):328–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF et al (2014) Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of hodgkin and non-hodgkin lymphoma: the lugano classification. J Clin Oncol 32(27):3059–3067. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.54.8800
Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Müeller SP et al (2014) Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the international conference on malignant lymphomas imaging working group. J Clin Oncol. ;32:3048–58
Nioche C, Orlhac F, Boughdad S et al (2018) LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 78(16):4786–4789. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0125
Dubois D, Dubois EF (1916) A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 17:863–871
Frood R, Burton C, Tsoumpas C, Frangi AF, Gleeson F, Patel C, Scarsbrook A (2021) Baseline PET/CT imaging parameters for prediction of treatment outcome in Hodgkin and diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48(10):3198–3220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05233-2
Durmo R, Donati B, Rebaud L, Cottereau AS, Ruffini A, Nizzoli ME, Ciavarella S, Vegliante MC, Nioche C, Meignan M, Merli F, Versari A, Ciarrocchi A, Buvat I, Luminari S (2022) Prognostic value of lesion dissemination in doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine-treated, interimPET-negative classical Hodgkin Lymphoma patients: a radio-genomic study. Hematol Oncol 40(4):645–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.3025
Cottereau AS, Meignan M, Nioche C, Capobianco N, Clerc J, Chartier L, Vercellino L, Casasnovas O, Thieblemont C, Buvat I (2021) Risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma using lesion dissemination and metabolic tumor burden calculated from baseline PET/CT. Ann Oncol 32(3):404–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.019
Bailly C, Eugène T, Couec ML, StrulluM, Frampas E, Campion L et al (2014) Prognostic value and clinical impact of (18)FDG-PET in the management of children with Burkitt lymphoma after induction chemotherapy. Front Med (Lausanne) 16(1):54
Wen WX, Huang JJ, Li WY, Zhang X, Xia Y, Jiang WQ et al (2015) Prognostic values of interim and post-therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning in adult patients with Burkitt’s lymphoma. Chin J Cancer 2(34):608–613
Zeng W, Lechowicz MJ, Winton E, Cho SM, Galt JR, Halkar R (2009) Spectrum of FDG PET/CT findings in Burkitt lymphoma. Clin Nucl Med 4:355–358
Karantanis D, Durski JM, Lowe VJ, Nathan MA, Mullan BP, Georgiou E et al (2012) 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Burkitt’s lymphoma. Eur J Radiol 75:e68–73
Funding
No funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, D.A. and A.C.; methodology, G.T. and F.D.; data curation, A.T.; A.C.; C.P. and F.D.; supervision,A.T. and F.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A., G.T. and A,C. Preparation figures: C.P., A.T., F.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Ethical approval: all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Ethical review and approval were waived for this study (observational retrospective) due to the retrospective design of the study, according to local laws.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1:
ROC: receiver operating characteristic (ROC); AUC; area under the curve; OS: overall survival; SUV: standardized uptake value; bw: body wheight; lbm:lean body mass; bsa: body surface area; MTV: total metabolic tumor volume; TLG: total lesion glycolysis; Dmax: maximum tumor dissemination
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Albano, D., Calabrò, A., Talin, A. et al. 2-[18]F FDG PET/CT dissemination features in adult burkitt lymphoma Are predictive of outcome. Ann Hematol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-05672-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-05672-5