Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction nomogram based on 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinical parameters for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a nomogram including parameters assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinical parameters for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to predict progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 181 patients with pathologically diagnosed DLBCL at Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute from March 2015 to December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to calculate the optimal cutoff values of the semiquantitative parameters (SUVmax, TLG, MTV, and Dmax) for PFS. A nomogram was constructed according to multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. The predictive and discriminatory capacities of the nomogram were then measured using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, and Kaplan–Meier curves. The predictive and discriminatory capacities of the nomogram and the International Prognostic Index of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN-IPI) were compared via the C-index and AUC. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that male gender and pretreatment Ann Arbor stage III-IV, non-GCB, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), number of extranodal organ involvement (Neo)>1, MTV≥152.8 cm3, and Dmax ≥53.9 cm were associated with unfavorable PFS (all p<0.05). The nomogram, including gender, Ann Arbor stage, pathology type, Neo, LDH levels, MTV, and Dmax, showed good prediction accuracy, with a C-index of 0.760 (95% CI: 0.727–0.793), which was higher than that of NCCN-IPI (0.710; 95% CI: 0.669–751). The calibration plots for 2-year demonstrated good consistency between the predicted and observed probabilities for survival time. We established a nomogram including MTV, Dmax, and several clinical parameters to predict the PFS of patients with DLBCL, and the nomogram showed better predictability and higher accuracy than NCCN-IPI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Hamadani M, Habermann TM, Cerhan JR, Macon WR, Maurer MJ, Go RS (2015) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype distribution, geodemographic patterns, and survival in the US: a longitudinal analysis of the National Cancer Data Base from 1998 to 2011. Am J Hematol 90(9):790–795. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi Y, Han Y, Yang J, Liu P, He X, Zhang C, Zhou S, Zhou L, Qin Y, Song Y, Liu Y, Wang S, Jin J, Gui L, Sun Y (2019) Clinical features and outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on nodal or extranodal primary sites of origin: Analysis of 1,085 WHO classified cases in a single institution in China. Chin J Cancer Res 31(1):152–161. https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.01.10

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frood R, Burton C, Tsoumpas C, Frangi AF, Gleeson F, Patel C, Scarsbrook A (2021) Baseline PET/CT imaging parameters for prediction of treatment outcome in Hodgkin and diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a systematic review. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48(10):3198–3220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05233-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou Z, Sehn LH, Rademaker AW, Gordon LI, Lacasce AS, Crosby-Thompson A, Vanderplas A, Zelenetz AD, Abel GA, Rodriguez MA, Nademanee A, Kaminski MS, Czuczman MS, Millenson M, Niland J, Gascoyne RD, Connors JM, Friedberg JW, Winter JN (2014) An enhanced International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in the rituximab era. Blood 123(6):837–842. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-09-524108

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sehn LH, Berry B, Chhanabhai M, Fitzgerald C, Gill K, Hoskins P, Klasa R, Savage KJ, Shenkier T, Sutherland J, Gascoyne RD, Connors JM (2007) The revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) is a better predictor of outcome than the standard IPI for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP. Blood 109(5):1857–1861. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-08-038257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang M, Chen P, Ruan X, Ye X, Pan Y, Zhang J, Huang Q, Zhou W, Wu H, Wang Q (2017) Interim (18)F-FDG PET/CT improves the prognostic value of S-IPI, R-IPI and NCCN-IPI in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncol Lett 14(6):6715–6723. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7093

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams HJ, Kwee TC (2016) Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET in R-CHOP-treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 106:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakaya A, Fujita S, Satake A, Nakanishi T, Azuma Y, Tsubokura Y, Hotta M, Yoshimura H, Ishii K, Ito T, Nomura S (2016) Enhanced international prognostic index in Japanese patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leuk Res Rep 6:24–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrr.2016.06.003

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheson BD (2011) Role of functional imaging in the management of lymphoma. J Clin Oncol : Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 29(14):1844–1854. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.5225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Galaly TC, Gormsen LC, Hutchings M (2018) PET/CT for staging; past, present, and future. Semin Nucl Med 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.09.001

  11. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, Lister TA, Alliance AL, Lymphoma G, Eastern Cooperative Oncology G, European Mantle Cell Lymphoma C, Italian Lymphoma F, European Organisation for R, Treatment of Cancer/Dutch Hemato-Oncology G, Grupo Espanol de Medula O, German High-Grade Lymphoma Study G, German Hodgkin's Study G, Japanese Lymphorra Study G, Lymphoma Study A, Group NCT, Nordic Lymphoma Study G, Southwest Oncology G, United Kingdom National Cancer Research I (2014) Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol 32(27):3059–3068. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu L, Meng Y, Guo L, Zhao H, Shi Y, Li S, Wang A, Zhang X, Shi J, Zhu J, Xu K (2021) Predictive value of baseline (18)F-FDG PET/CT and interim treatment response for the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP chemotherapy. Oncol Lett 21(2):132. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2020.12393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aide N, Fruchart C, Nganoa C, Gac AC, Lasnon C (2020) Baseline (18)F-FDG PET radiomic features as predictors of 2-year event-free survival in diffuse large B cell lymphomas treated with immunochemotherapy. Eur Radiol 30(8):4623–4632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06815-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Toledano MN, Desbordes P, Banjar A, Gardin I, Vera P, Ruminy P, Jardin F, Tilly H, Becker S (2018) Combination of baseline FDG PET/CT total metabolic tumour volume and gene expression profile have a robust predictive value in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45(5):680–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3907-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Islam P, Goldstein J, Flowers CR (2019) PET-derived tumor metrics predict DLBCL response and progression-free survival. Leuk Lymphoma 60(8):1965–1971. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2018.1562181

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang YY, Song L, Zhao MX, Hu K (2019) A better prediction of progression-free survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by a prognostic model consisting of baseline TLG and %DeltaSUVmax. Cancer Med 8(11):5137–5147. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cottereau AS, Nioche C, Dirand AS, Clerc J, Morschhauser F, Casasnovas O, Meignan M, Buvat I (2020) (18)F-FDG PET dissemination features in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma are predictive of outcome. J Nucl Med 61(1):40–45. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229450

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li H, Shao G, Zhang Y, Chen X, Du C, Wang K, Gao Z (2021) Nomograms based on SUVmax of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and clinical parameters for predicting progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Imaging 21(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00379-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen SY, Yang Y, Qi SN, Wang Y, Hu C, He X, Zhang LL, Wu G, Qu BL, Qian LT, Hou XR, Zhang FQ, Qiao XY, Wang H, Li GF, Zhang YJ, Zhu Y, Cao JZ, Lan SM et al (2021) Validation of nomogram-revised risk index and comparison with other models for extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma in the modern chemotherapy era: indication for prognostication and clinical decision-making. Leukemia 35(1):130–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0791-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ceci F, Bianchi L, Borghesi M, Polverari G, Farolfi A, Briganti A, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Castellucci P, Fanti S (2020) Prediction nomogram for (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in different clinical settings of PSA failure after radical treatment for prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 47(1):136–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04505-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grimes DA (2008) The nomogram epidemic: resurgence of a medical relic. Ann Intern Med 149(4):273–275. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-4-200808190-00010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Balachandran VP, Gonen M, Smith JJ, DeMatteo RP (2015) Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye. Lancet Oncol 16(4):e173–e180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71116-7

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, Gascoyne RD, Delabie J, Ott G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Campo E, Braziel RM, Jaffe ES, Pan Z, Farinha P, Smith LM, Falini B, Banham AH, Rosenwald A, Staudt LM, Connors JM, Armitage JO, Chan WC (2004) Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood 103(1):275–282. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-05-1545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nioche C, Orlhac F, Boughdad S, Reuze S, Goya-Outi J, Robert C, Pellot-Barakat C, Soussan M, Frouin F, Buvat I (2018) LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 78(16):4786–4789. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ilyas H, Mikhaeel NG, Dunn JT, Rahman F, Moller H, Smith D, Barrington SF (2019) Is there an optimal method for measuring baseline metabolic tumor volume in diffuse large B cell lymphoma? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46(2):520–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4200-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta N, Singh N (2020) To evaluate prognostic significance of metabolic-derived tumour volume at staging 18-flurodeoxyglucose PET-CT scan and to compare it with standardized uptake value-based response evaluation on interim 18-flurodeoxyglucose PET-CT scan in patients of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). Nucl Med Commun 41(4):395–404. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Laursen MB, Reinholdt L, Schonherz AA, Due H, Jespersen DS, Grubach L, Ettrup MS, Roge R, Falgreen S, Sorensen S, Bodker JS, Schmitz A, Johnsen HE, Bogsted M, Dybkaer K (2019) High CXCR4 expression impairs rituximab response and the prognosis of R-CHOP-treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. Oncotarget 10(7):717–731. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26588

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Song MK, Yang DH, Lee GW, Lim SN, Shin S, Pak KJ, Kwon SY, Shim HK, Choi BH, Kim IS, Shin DH, Kim SG, Oh SY (2016) High total metabolic tumor volume in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients with bone marrow involvement in rituximab era. Leuk Res 42:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2016.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Song MK, Chung JS, Shin HJ, Lee SM, Lee SE, Lee HS, Lee GW, Kim SJ, Lee SM, Chung DS (2012) Clinical significance of metabolic tumor volume by PET/CT in stages II and III of diffuse large B cell lymphoma without extranodal site involvement. Ann Hematol 91(5):697–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1357-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao P, Yu T, Pan Z (2021) Prognostic value of the baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and further stratification in low-intermediate (L-I) and high-intermediate (H-I) risk NCCNIPI subgroup by MTV in DLBCL MTV predict prognosis in DLBCL. Ann Nucl Med 35(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01531-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meignan M, Cottereau AS, Specht L, Mikhaeel NG (2021) Total tumor burden in lymphoma - an evolving strong prognostic parameter. Br J Radiol 94(1127):20210448. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210448

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pfreundschuh M, Muller C, Zeynalova S, Kuhnt E, Wiesen MH, Held G, Rixecker T, Poeschel V, Zwick C, Reiser M, Schmitz N, Murawski N (2014) Suboptimal dosing of rituximab in male and female patients with DLBCL. Blood 123(5):640–646. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-07-517037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith A, Crouch S, Lax S, Li J, Painter D, Howell D, Patmore R, Jack A, Roman E (2015) Lymphoma incidence, survival and prevalence 2004-2014: sub-type analyses from the UK's Haematological Malignancy Research Network. Br J Cancer 112(9):1575–1584. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.94

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pansy K, Feichtinger J, Ehall B, Uhl B, Sedej M, Roula D, Pursche B, Wolf A, Zoidl M, Steinbauer E, Gruber V, Greinix HT, Prochazka KT, Thallinger GG, Heinemann A, Beham-Schmid C, Neumeister P, Wrodnigg TM, Fechter K, Deutsch AJ (2019) The CXCR4-CXCL12-axis is of prognostic relevance in DLBCL and its antagonists exert pro-apoptotic effects in vitro. Int J Mol Sci 20(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194740

  35. Bento L, Diaz-Lopez A, Barranco G, Martin-Moreno AM, Baile M, Martin A, Sancho JM, Garcia O, Rodriguez M, Sanchez-Pina JM, Novelli S, Salar A, Bastos M, Rodriguez-Salazar MJ, Gonzalez de Villambrosia S, Cordoba R, Garcia-Recio M, Martinez-Serra J, Del Campo R et al (2020) New prognosis score including absolute lymphocyte/monocyte ratio, red blood cell distribution width and beta-2 microglobulin in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP: Spanish Lymphoma Group Experience (GELTAMO). Br J Haematol 188(6):888–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Program of Sichuan Province (Grant No.22DYF2372); Science and Technology Program of Sichuan Province (Grant No.2020YFS0417); Sichuan Medical Research Project (Grant No. S21030); Sichuan Cancer Hospital Outstanding Youth Funding (Grant No. YB2021029); and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Clinical Research Special Fund Project (Grant No.320.6750.19094-36).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Xiaojuan Peng, Jun Dang, Xiaoxiong Wang, and Yongli Liu. Design of the project and data analysis were performed by Xiaojuan Peng, Sisi Yu, Ying Kou, Ping Wu, Zhuzhong Cheng, Yutang Yao, and Jiaqi Shen. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Xiaojuan Peng and the article revision by Sisi Yu, Ying Kou, and Zhuzhong Cheng. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhuzhong Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This is a retrospective study. The Sichuan Province Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 32.7 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, X., Yu, S., Kou, Y. et al. Prediction nomogram based on 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinical parameters for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ann Hematol 102, 3115–3124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-023-05336-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-023-05336-w

Keywords

Navigation