Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pseudothrombocytopenia, beyond a laboratory phenomenon: study of 192 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The platelet antibodies that cause pseudothrombocytopenia (PTCP) act only in vitro and do not produce clinical bleeding. Most studies on PTCP have focused on improving differential diagnosis with true thrombocytopenia but studies on the characteristics of patients with PTCP are limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and biological characteristics of 192 patients with PTCP. In addition to general variables, we evaluated automated and microscopic platelet counts, platelet clumps, platelet diameters, immature platelet fraction (IPF), and platelet antibodies. Adult women accounted for the largest subgroup of patients (n=82; 42.7%) and 67 patients (34.9%) were grouped into families. Forty-four patients (22.9%) had one or more associated autoimmune disorders (ADs); 39 relatives of these patients (19.8%) had ADs and 45 relatives (23.4%) had immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) or unspecified thrombocytopenia. Platelet cryptantibodies and/or autoantibodies were positive in 56 patients (30.1%). Most patients (n=169; 80%) had automated platelet counts >80×109/L. In all patients, microscopic platelet counts were ≥150×109/L. The platelet clump index (% increase in microscopic platelet count compared to automatic count) ranged from 30 to >7000%. Platelet diameters and IPF parameters were significantly greater in the PTCP versus healthy controls (p<0.001). A total of 17 patients (8.8%) had had previous ITP or the PTCP evolved into ITP. Our data suggest that PTCP should be considered a situation of autoimmunity; the assessment of platelet clumps has a high diagnostic value; the close association between ITP and PTCP suggests that these conditions could be different phases of the same process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Gowland E, Kay E, Spillman JC, Williamson JR (1969) Agglutination of platelets by a serum factor in the presence of EDTA. J Clin Pathol 22:460–464. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.22.4.460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pegels JG, Bruynes ECE, Engelfriet CP, von dem Borne AEGK (1982) Pseudothrombocytopenia: an immunologic study on platelet antibodies dependent on ethylene diamine tetra-acetate. Blood 59:157–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. von dem Borne AEGK, van der Lelie H, Vos JJE, van der Plas-van Dalen CM, Risseeuw-Bogaert NJ, Ticheler MDA, Pegels HG (1986) III. Antibodies against cryptantigens of platelets. Characterization and significance for the serologist. Curr Stud Hematol Blood Transfus 52:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Casonato A, Bertomoro A, Pontara E, Dannhauser D, Lazzaro AR, Girolami A (1994) EDTA dependent pseudothrombocytopenia caused by antibodies against the cytoadhesive receptor of platelet gpIIB-IIIA. J Clin Pathol 47:625–630. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.47.7.625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia Suarez J, Calero MA, Ricard MP, Krsnik I, Rus F, Perera F, Merino JL (1992) EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia in ambulatory patients: clinical characteristics and role of new automated cell-counting in its detection. Am J Hematol 39:146–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.2830390215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bizzaro N (1995) EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia: a clinical and epidemiological study of 112 cases, with 10-year follow-up. Am J Hematol 50:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.2830500206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagler M, Keller P, Siegrist D, Alberio L (2014) A case of EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia: simple recognition of an underdiagnosed and misleading phenomenon. BMC Clin Pathol 14:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-14-19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lardinois B, Favresse J, Chatelain B, Lippi G, Mullier F (2021) Pseudothrombocytopenia - a review on causes, occurrence and clinical implications. J Clin Med 10:594. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040594

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao Y, Yu S, Xu Y (2015) The prevalence and biochemical profiles of EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia in a generally healthy population. Acta Haematol 134:177–180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000373915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang L, Xu J, Gao L, Pan S (2018) Spurious thrombocytopenia in automated platelet count. Lab Med 49:130–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmx081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maslanka K, Marciniak-Bielak D, Szczepinski A (2008) Pseudothrombocytopenia in blood donors. Vox Sang 95:349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.2008.01103.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berkman N, Michaeli Y, Or R, Eldor A (1991) EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia: a clinical study of 18 patients and review of the literature. Am J Hematol 36:195–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muñiz-Diaz E, Madoz P, Pujol-Moix N, Pastoret C, Arilla M, Ibañez M, Guanyabens C, Domingo-Albós A (1995) Characterization of antibodies directed against platelet cryptantigens detected during the immunological study of 356 consecutive patients with presumed autoimmune thrombocytopenia (AITP). Transfus Med 5:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3148.1995.tb00226.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Froom P, Barak M (2011) Prevalence and course of pseudothrombocytopenia in outpatients. Clin Chem Lab Med 49:111–114. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baccini V, Franck G, Jacqmin H, Chatelain B, Girard S, Wuilleme S, Vedrenne A, Guiheneu E, Toussaint-Hacquard M, Everaere F, Soulard M, Lesesve JF, Bardet V (2020) Platelet counting: ugly traps and good advice. Proposals from the French-Speaking Cellular Hematology Group (GFHC). J Clin Med 9:808. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030808

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuff-Werner P, Mansour J, Gropp A (2020) Pseudo-thrombocytopenia (PTCP). A challenge in the daily laboratory routine? J Lab Med 44:295–304. https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2020-0099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pujol-Moix N, Jimenez B, Muñiz-Diaz E, Roca M, Souto JC (2018) Familial immune thrombocytopenia. Report of 16 cases and literature review. J Rare Dis Res Treat 4:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. George JN, Woolf SH, Raskob GE, Wasser JS, Aledort LM, Ballem PJ, Blanchette VS, Bussel JB, Cines DB, Kelton JG, Lichtin AE, McMillan R, Okerbloom JA, Regan DH, Warrier I (1996) Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a practice guideline developed by explicit methods for the American Society of Hematology. Blood 88:3–40. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853899808999383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aledort LM, Hayward CP, Chen MG, Nichol JL, Bussel J, ITP Study Group (2004) Prospective screening of 205 patients with ITP, including diagnosis, serological markers, and the relationship between platelet counts, endogenous thrombopoietin, and circulating antithrombopoietin antibodies. Am J Hematol 76:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.20104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noris P, Biino G, Pecci A, Civaschi E, Savoia A, Seri M, Melazzini F, Loffredo G, Russo G, Bozzi V, Notarangelo LD, Gresele P, Heller PG, Pujol-Moix N, Kunishima S, Cattaneo M, Bussel J, De Candia E, Cagioni C et al (2014) Platelet diameters in inherited thrombocytopenias: analysis of 376 patients with all known disorders. Blood 124:e4–e10. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-03-564328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pujol-Moix N, Muñiz-Diaz E, Soler JA, Hernandez A, Boqué C, Callís M, López-Andrés N, Madoz P (1996) Familial immune pseudothrombocytopenia (9 cases). Transfus Med 6:197

    Google Scholar 

  22. Isik A, Balcik OS, Akdeniz D, Cipil H, Uysal S, Kosar A (2012) Relationship between some clinical situations, autoantibodies, and pseudothrombocytopenia. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 18:645–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029611434525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Díaz-Polo LE, Pujol-Moix N, Jiménez B, Canals C, Barranco-Charris E, Muñiz-Díaz E, Souto JC (2016) Shared autoimmunity: a case series of 56 patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) associated with other autoimmune disorders. OALibJ 3:e2807

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rojas-Villarraga A, Amaya-Amaya J, Rodriguez-Rodriguez A, Mantilla RD, Anaya JM (2012) Introducing polyautoimmunity: secondary autoimmune diseases no longer exist. Autoimmune Dis 2012:254319. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/254319

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mackay IR (2009) Clustering and commonalities among autoimmune diseases. J Autoimmun 33:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2009.09.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anaya JM, Tobon GJ, Vega P, Castiblanco J (2006) Autoimmune disease aggregation in families with primary Sjögren's syndrome. J Rheumatol 33:2227–2234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spitzer-Kravitz M, Marai I, Shoenfeld Y (2005) Coexistence of thyroid autoimmunity with other autoimmune diseases: Friend or foe? Additional aspects on the mosaic of autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 38:247–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08916930500050194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bai M, Feng J, Liang G (2018) Transient EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia phenomenon in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome. Clin Lab 64:1581–1583. https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee AC (2021) Pseudothrombocytopenia: what every clinician should know. Pediatr Neonatol 62:218–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2020.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zandecki M, Genevieve F, Gerard J, Godon A (2007) Spurious counts and spurious results on haematology analysers: a review. Part I: platelets. Int J Lab Hematol 29:4–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2257.2006.00870.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cornbleet PJ, Myrick D, Levy R (1993) Evaluation of the Coulter STKS. five-part differential. Am J Clin Pathol 99:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/99.1.72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gulati GL, Kocher W, Schwarting R, Issa A, Dhanjal M (1999) Suspect flags and regional flags on the Coulter-STKS. An assessment Lab Med 30:675–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sandhaus LM, Osei ES, Agrawal NN, Dillman CA, Meyerson HJ (2002) Platelet counting by the Coulter LH 750, Sysmex XE 2100, and Advia 120. A comparative analysis using the RBC/platelet ratio reference method. Am J Clin Pathol 118:235–241. https://doi.org/10.1309/MK3G-MC3V-P06R-PNV2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Briggs CJ, Linssen J, Longair I, Machin SJ (2011) Improved flagging rates on the Sysmex XE-5000 compared with the XE-2100 reduce the number of manual film reviews and increase laboratory productivity. Am J Clin Pathol 136:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPDLR4KGKAFW4W

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ali I, Graham C, Dempsey-Hibbert NC (2019) Immature platelet fraction as a useful marker in the etiological determination of thrombocytopenia. Exp Hematol 78:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2019.09.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Miyazaki K, Koike Y, Kunishima S, Ishii R, Danbara M, Horie R, Yatomi Y, Higashihara M (2015) Immature platelet fraction measurement is influenced by platelet size and is a useful parameter for discrimination of macrothrombocytopenia. Hematology 20:587–592. https://doi.org/10.1179/1607845415Y.0000000021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chiurazzi F, Villa MR, Rotoli B (1999) Transplacental transmission of EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia. Haematologica 84:664

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ohno N, Kobayashi M, Hayakawa S, Utsunomiya A, Karakawa S (2012) Transient pseudothrombocytopenia in a neonate: transmission of a maternal EDTA-dependent anticoagulant. Platelets 23:399–400. https://doi.org/10.3109/09537104.2011.624210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Korterink JJ, Boersma B, Schoorl M, Porcelijn L, Bartels PCM (2013) Pseudothrombocytopenia in a neonate due to mother? Eur J Pediatr 172:987–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-012-1892-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Forscher CA, Sussman II, Friedman EW, Solomon V, Spaet TH (1985) Pseudothrombocytopenia masking true thrombocytopenia. Am J Hmatol 18:313–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.2830180314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fozza C, Pardini S, Marras T, Longu F, Isoni A, Contini S, Longinotti M (2014) Pseudothrombocytopenia in a patient receiving romiplostim for immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Ann Hematol 93:899–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-013-1907-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Salama A (2015) Autoimmune thrombocytopenia complicated by EDTA and/or citrate-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia. Transfus Med Hemother 42:345–348. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Bradley Londres for professional language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N. Pujol-Moix and E. Muñiz-Diaz designed and coordinated de study. N. Pujol-Moix wrote the article. N. Pujol-Moix, J. C. Souto, I. Español, and A. Soler collected the clinical and laboratory data (automated platelet counts and indices, microscopic platelet counts and analyses on blood smears). E. Muñiz-Diaz performed the analyses of platelet antibodies. S. Mojal performed the statistical analyses. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Núria Pujol-Moix.

Ethics declarations

-The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

-The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pujol-Moix, N., Muñiz-Díaz, E., Español, I. et al. Pseudothrombocytopenia, beyond a laboratory phenomenon: study of 192 cases. Ann Hematol 102, 1363–1374 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-023-05192-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-023-05192-8

Key words

Navigation