Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of age, functional status, and comorbidities on quality of life and outcomes in elderly patients with AML: review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incidence of acute myeloid leukemia increases with age, and more than half of AML patients are over 60 years old. Treating elderly AML patients presents several challenges and uncertainties, linked partly to disease characteristics and partly to the difficulty of establishing which patients could benefit from the best treatment. Although some elderly fit patients can receive intensive therapy, many of them are not treated and not enrolled in clinical trials. Yet supportive care is associated with significantly lower survival rates compared to intensive therapy or lower intensive therapy. A poorer prognosis in elderly patients is related to age, functional status, and comorbidities, combined with leukemia characteristics. Chronological age is not the best surrogate factor for selecting patients eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Scoring systems—including patient characteristics (ECOG, comorbidities) and disease characteristics (cytogenetics and molecular parameters)—designed to evaluate probabilities of response to treatment, morbidity, and survival may be used to balance the risk-benefit ratio for intensive therapy. A geriatric assessment (GA) to evaluate physical function, comorbidities, nutritional status, cognitive function, and social support could help identify the most vulnerable patients so that they can receive intensive therapy. A GA would also help take the necessary steps to improve tolerance to treatment. Evaluating markers of fitness and quality of life as part of clinical trials should be favored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Appelbaum FR, Gundacker H, Head DR et al (2006) Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 107(9):3481–3485

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kantarjian H, O’brien S, Cortes J et al (2006) Results of intensive chemotherapy in 998 patients age 65 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: predictive prognostic models for outcome. Cancer. 106(5):1090–1098

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leith CP, Kopecky KJ, Chen IM et al (1999) Frequency and clinical significance of the expression of the multidrug resistance proteins MDR1/P-glycoprotein, MRP1, and LRP in acute myeloid leukemia. a SouthwestOncology Group study. Blood. 94:1086–1099

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burnett A, Wetzler M, Lowenberg B (2011) Therapeutic advances in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 29:487–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fröhling S, Schlenk RF, Kayser S et al (2006) German-Austrian AML Study Group. Cytogenetics and age are major determinants of outcome in intensively treated acute myeloid leukemia patients older than 60 years: results from AMLSG trial AML HD98-B. Blood. 108(10):3280–3288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Juliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A et al (2009) Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Blood. 113(18):4179–4187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kantarjian H, Ravandi F, O’Brien S et al (2010) Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 116(22):4422–4429

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Extermann M (2000) Measurement and impact of comorbidity in older cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 35(3):181–200 Review

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Extermann M, Overcash J, Lyman GH et al (1998) Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 16:1582–1587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Extermann M (2000) Measuring comorbidity in older cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 36(4):453–471 Review

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Campisi J (2005) Senescent cells, tumor suppression, and organismal aging: good citizens, bad neighbors (Review). Cell 120:513–522

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J et al (2012) Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 120:2454–2465

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Aoki J, Kanamori H, Tanaka M et al (2016) Impact of age on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol 91(3):302–307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Østgård LS, Nørgaard JM, Sengeløv H et al (2015) Comorbidity and performance status in acute myeloid leukemia patients: a nation-wide population-based cohort study. Leukemia. 29(3):548–555

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorror ML, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE et al (2011) Long-term outcomes among older patients following nonmyeloablative conditioning and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies. JAMA 306:1874–1883

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Krug U, Röllig C, Koschmieder A et al (2010) German Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Cooperative Group; Study Alliance Leukemia Investigators. Complete remission and early death after intensive chemotherapy in patients aged 60 years or older with acute myeloid leukaemia: a web-based application for prediction of outcomes. Lancet. 376(9757):2000–2008

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walter RB, Othus M, Borthakur G et al (2011) Prediction of early death after induction therapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with pretreatment risk scores: a novel paradigm for treatment assignment. J Clin Oncol 29(33):4417–4423

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Othus M, Kantarjian H, Petersdorf S et al (2014) Declining rates of treatment-related mortality in patients with newly diagnosed AML given ‘intense’ induction regimens: a report from SWOG and MD Anderson. Leukemia. 28(2):289–292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Valderas JM, Starfield B, Sibbald B, Salisbury C, Roland M (2009 Jul) Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services. Ann Fam Med 7(4):357–363

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tawfik B, Pardee TS, Isom S et al (2016) Comorbidity, age, and mortality among adults treated intensively for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). J Geriatr Oncol 7(1):24–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Talati C, Dhulipala VC, Extermann M, et al. Comparisons of commonly used frontline regimens on survival outcomes in patients age 70 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2019 May 9. pii: haematol.2018.208637

  22. Platzbecker U, Schetelig J, Finke J et al (2012) German MDS Study; Cooperative Transplant Study Group; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients age 60-70 years with de novo high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or secondary acute myelogenous leukemia: comparison with patients lacking donors who received azacitidine. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 18(9):1415–1421

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Koreth J, Pidala J, Perez WS et al (2013) Role of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in older patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes: an international collaborative decision analysis. J Clin Oncol 31:2662–2670

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Diaconescu R, Flowers CR, Storer B et al (2004) Morbidity and mortality with nonmyeloablative compared to myeloablative conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA matched related donors. Blood. 104:1550–1558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R et al (2005) Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 106(8):2912–2919

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Giles FJ, Borthakur G, Ravandi F et al (2007) The haematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index score is predictive of early death and survival in patients over 60 years of age receiving induction therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 136(4):624–627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sorror ML, Storer BE, Fathi AT et al (2017) Development and validation of a novel acute myeloid leukemia-composite model to estimate risks of mortality. JAMA Oncol 3(12):1675–1682

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. NCI. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; Available from: 2015http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/amyl.html

  29. Sorror ML, Storer BE, Elsawy M et al (2016) Intensive versus non-intensive induction therapy for patients (Pts) with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using two different novel prognostic models. Blood 128:216

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wass M, Hitz F, Schaffrath J et al (2016) Value of different comorbidity indices for predicting outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS One 11(10):e0164587

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Piccirillo JF, Tierney RM, Costas I et al (2004) Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. JAMA. 291(20):2441–2447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor PR, Reid MM, Stark AN et al (1995) De novo acute myeloid leukaemia in patients over 55-years-old: a population-based study of incidence, treatment and outcome. Northern Region Haematology Group Leukemia 9:231–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Malfuson JV, Etienne A, Turlure P et al (2008) Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA). Risk factors and decision criteria for intensive chemotherapy in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 93(12):1806–1813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kalin B, Pijnappel EN, van Gelder M et al (2018) Intensive treatment and trial participation in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients: a population-based analysis in The Netherlands. Cancer Epidemiol 57:90–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Alibhai SM, Leach M, Kermalli H et al (2007) The impact of acute myeloid leukemia and its treatment on quality of life and functional status in older adults. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 64:19–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hickey A, Barker M, McGee H et al (2005) Measuring health-related quality of life in older patient populations: a review of current approaches. Pharmacoeconomics 23(10):971–993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sajid MS, Tonsi A, Baig MK (2008) Health-related quality of life measurement. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 21(4):365–373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sekeres MA, Stone RM, Zahrieh D et al (2004) Decision-making and quality of life in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia or advanced myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia 18:809–816

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Alibhai SM, Leach M, Kowgier ME et al (2007) Fatigue in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: predictors and associations with quality of life and functional status. Leukemia 21:845–848

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gill TM, Allore HG, Holford TR et al (2004) Hospitalization, restricted activity, and the development of disability among older persons. JAMA. 292(17):2115–2124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chuang KH, Covinsky KE, Sands LP et al (2003) Diagnosis-related group-adjusted hospital costs are higher in older medical patients with lower functional status. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(12):1729–1734

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dombret H, Seymour JF, Butrym A et al (2015) International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts. Blood. 126(3):291–299

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Oliva EN, Nobile F, Alimena G et al (2011) Quality of life in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: patients may be more accurate than physicians. Haematologica. 96(5):696–702

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wedding U, Röhrig B, Klippstein A et al (2006) Impairment in functional status and survival in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 132(10):665–671

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Alibhai SM, Breunis H, Timilshina N et al (2015) Quality of life and physical function in adults treated with intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia improve over time independent of age. J Geriatr Oncol. 6(4):262–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Timilshina N, Breunis H, Tomlinson GA et al (2019) Long-term recovery of quality of life and physical function over three years in adult survivors of acute myeloid leukemia after intensive chemotherapy. Leukemia. 33(1):15–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vessby K, Kjellberg A (2010) Participation in occupational therapy research: a literature review. Br J Occup Ther 73(7):319–326

    Google Scholar 

  48. Klepin HD, Danhauer SC, Tooze JA et al (2011) Exercise for older adult in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: a pilot study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2(1):11–17

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Alibhai SM, Durbano S, Breunis H, et al; A phase II exercise randomized controlled trial for patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy. Leuk Res. 2015 . pii: S0145–2126(15)30365–9

  50. Alibhai SM, O’Neill S, Fisher-Schlombs K et al (2014) A pilot phase II RCT of a home-based exercise intervention for survivors of AML. Support Care Cancer 22(4):881–889

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Repetto L, Fratino L, Audisio RA et al (2002) Comprehensive geriatric assessment adds information to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in elderly cancer patients: an Italian Group for Geriatric Oncology Study. J Clin Oncol 20(2):494–502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG et al (2011) Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 29(25):3457–3465

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Extermann M, Boler I, Reich RR et al (2012) Predicting the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients: the Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-age patients (CRASH) score. Cancer. 118(13):3377–3386

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Extermann M, Hurria A (2007) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(14):1824–1831

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hamaker ME, Prins MC, Stauder R (2014) The relevance of a geriatric assessment for elderly patients with a haematological malignancy–a systematic review. Leuk Res 38(3):275–283

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Deschler B, Ihorst G, Platzbecker U et al (2013) Parameters detected by geriatric and quality of life assessment in 195 older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia are highly predictive for outcome. Haematologica. 98(2):208–216

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Sherman AE, Motyckova G, Fega KR et al (2013) Geriatric assessment in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective study of associated treatment and outcomes. Leuk Res 37(9):998–1003

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Nagel G, Weber D, Fromm E, German-Austrian AML Study Group (AMLSG) et al (2017) Epidemiological, genetic, and clinical characterization by age of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia based on an academic population-based registry study (AMLSG BiO). Ann Hematol 96:1993–2003

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Lancet JE, Uy GL, Cortes JE, et al; CPX-351 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) liposome for injection versus conventional cytarabine plus daunorubicin in older patients with newly diagnosed secondary acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2018 S;36(26):2684–2692

  60. Stone RM, Mandrekar SJ, Sanford BL, Laumann K, Geyer S, Bloomfield CD, Thiede C, Prior TW, Döhner K, Marcucci G, Lo-Coco F, Klisovic RB, Wei A, Sierra J, Sanz MA, Brandwein JM, de Witte T, Niederwieser D, Appelbaum FR, Medeiros BC, Tallman MS, Krauter J, Schlenk RF, Ganser A, Serve H, Ehninger G, Amadori S, Larson RA, Döhner H (2017) Midostaurin plus chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation. N Engl J Med 377(5):454–464

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Schlenk RF, Weber D, Fiedler W et al (2019) German-Austrian AML Study Group. Midostaurin added to chemotherapy and continued single-agent maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-ITD. Blood. 133(8):840–851

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Castaigne S, Pautas C, Terre C et al (2012) Effect of gemtuzumab ozogamicin on survival of adult patients with de-novo acute myeloid leukaemia (ALFA-0701): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 379(9825):1508–1516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Amadori S, Suciu S, Selleslag D, Aversa F, Gaidano G, Musso M, Annino L, Venditti A, Voso MT, Mazzone C, Magro D, de Fabritiis P, Muus P, Alimena G, Mancini M, Hagemeijer A, Paoloni F, Vignetti M, Fazi P, Meert L, Ramadan SM, Willemze R, de Witte T, Baron F (2016) Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin versus best supportive care in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy: results of the randomized phase III EORTC-GIMEMA AML-19 Trial. J Clin Oncol 34(9):972–979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Taksin AL, Legrand O, Raffoux et al. High efficacy and safety profile of fractionated doses of Mylotarg as induction therapy in patients with relapsed acute myeloblastic leukemia: a prospective study of the alfa group. Leukemia. 2007;21(1):66–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

  65. Burnett AK, Russell NH, Hills RK, Kell J, Freeman S, Kjeldsen L, Hunter AE, Yin J, Craddock CF, Dufva IH, Wheatley K, Milligan D (2012) Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to induction chemotherapy improves survival in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 30(32):3924–3931

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Burnett AK, Russell NH, Hills RK, et al; A comparison of clofarabine with ara-C, each in combination with daunorubicin as induction treatment in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2017 Feb;31(2):310–317. PMID: 27624670 Free PMC article

  67. Lancet JE, Kim J, Al Ali N, et al; Outcomes in AML patients age ≥70: a very large single institution experience. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35(suppl). abstr 7031

  68. Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Hellmann A et al (2019) Randomized comparison of low dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 33(2):379–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wei AH, Montesinos P, Ivanov V et al (2020) Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial. Blood. 135(24):2137–2145

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V et al (2020) Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 383(7):617–629

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Esteve J, Schots R, Bernal Del Castillo T, et al; Multicenter, open-label, 3-arm study of gilteritinib, gilteritinib plus azacitidine, or azacitidine alone in newly diagnosed FLT3 mutated (FLT3mut+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy: Findings from the Safety Cohort. Blood 2018; 132. Abstract2736

  72. Pollyea DA, Tallman MS, de Botton S et al (2019) Enasidenib, an inhibitor of mutant IDH2 proteins, induces durable remissions in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 33(11):2575–2584

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. DiNardo CD, Schuh AC, Stein EM, et al; Enasidenib plus azacitidine significantly improves complete remission and overall response compared with azacitidine alone in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) mutations: interim phase ii results from an ongoing, randomized study. Blood 2019; 134. Abstract 643

  74. Roboz GJ, DiNardo CD, Stein EM et al (2020) Ivosidenib induces deep durable remissions in patients with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 135(7):463–471

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Complete reference for line 520 (This is a web reference): National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (Version 2.2016). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_ gls/pdf/aml.pdf. Accessed June 29th, 2016

  76. Dohner H, Estey E, Grimwade D et al (2017) Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 129(4):424–447. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Pastore F, Dufour A, Benthaus T, Metzeler KH, Maharry KS, Schneider S, Ksienzyk B, Mellert G, Zellmeier E, Kakadia PM, Unterhalt M, Feuring-Buske M, Buske C, Braess J, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Krug U, Berdel WE, Buechner T, Woermann B, Hiddemann W, Bohlander SK, Marcucci G, Spiekermann K, Bloomfield CD, Hoster E (2014) Combined molecular and clinical prognostic index for relapse and survival in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 32(15):1586–1594

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ABM and KL conceived, designed, directed, and supervised the study and revised the manuscript. MS and DG collected the data. KL analyzed the data and wrote the first manuscript draft. All the authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamel Laribi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Outside this work, KL has received research grants from AbbVie, Novartis, Takeda, Roche, Amgen, and Sandoz as well as personal fees from AbbVie, Novartis, Sandoz, Celgene, Jansen, and Amgen. DG has received a research grant from Janssen and personal fees from Janssen, Abbvie, and Roche. ABM and MS declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laribi, K., Sobh, M., Ghez, D. et al. Impact of age, functional status, and comorbidities on quality of life and outcomes in elderly patients with AML: review. Ann Hematol 100, 1359–1376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-020-04375-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-020-04375-x

Keywords

Navigation