Skip to main content
Log in

Observational study of multiple myeloma in Latin America

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the outcomes of multiple myeloma in Latin America, a world region where incorporation of novel agents is generally slow. In the current retrospective-prospective study, we aimed to describe the patterns of care and treatment results in five Latin American countries. Between April 2007 and October 2009, patients who had been diagnosed from January 2005 to December 2007 were registered at 23 institutions from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Peru. We divided patients into two cohorts, according to transplantation eligibility, and analyzed them with regard to first-line treatment and overall survival (OS). We analyzed a total of 852 patients, 46.9 % of whom were female. The median follow-up was 62 months. Among transplantation-ineligible patients (N = 461), the mean age was 67.4 years, approximately one third of patients received a thalidomide-based treatment in the first line, and the median OS was 43.0 months. Transplantation-eligible patients (N = 391) had a mean age of 54.7 years and a median OS of 73.6 months. Autologous transplantation was performed in 58.6 % of the patients for whom this procedure was initially planned and in only 26.9 % of the overall patients. Our long-term results reflect the contemporary literature for patients with multiple myeloma treated with autologous transplantation and thalidomide-based regimens in clinical trials and observational studies. However, further efforts are needed to approve and incorporate novel agents in Latin American countries, as well as to increase access to transplantation, in order to achieve the expected improvements in patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:9–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blade J, Cibeira MT, Fernandez De Larrea C, Rosinol L (2010) Multiple myeloma. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 7):vii313–vii319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin M, Reddy S, Brawley OW (2003) Myeloma and race: a review of the literature. Cancer Metastasis Rev 22:87–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang SY, Yao M, Tang JL et al (2007) Epidemiology of multiple myeloma in Taiwan: increasing incidence for the past 25 years and higher prevalence of extramedullary myeloma in patients younger than 55 years. Cancer 110:896–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim K, Lee JH, Kim JS et al (2014) Clinical profiles of multiple myeloma in Asia—an Asian Myeloma Network study. Am J Hematol 89:751–756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hungria VT, Maiolino A, Martinez G et al (2008) Confirmation of the utility of the International Staging System and identification of a unique pattern of disease in Brazilian patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica 93:791–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG et al (2005) International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 23:3412–3420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. International Myeloma Working Group (2003) Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the international myeloma working group. Br J Haematol 121:749–757

  9. Durie BG, Salmon SE (1975) A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer 36:842–854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD (1983) Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol 1:710–719

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schemper M, Smith TL (1996) A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 17:343–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreau P, Attal M, Facon T (2015) Frontline therapy of multiple myeloma. Blood 125:3076–3084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Preeshagul IR, Van Besien K, Mark TM (2014) Controversies in multiple myeloma: to transplant or not? Curr Hematol Malig Rep 9:360–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C et al. (2015) Autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma in the era of new drugs: a phase III study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial). Blood 126(23):391

  15. Costa LJ, Zhang MJ, Zhong X et al (2013) Trends in utilization and outcomes of autologous transplantation as early therapy for multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 19:1615–1624

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Auner HW, Szydlo R, Hoek J et al (2015) Trends in autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in Europe: increased use and improved outcomes in elderly patients in recent years. Bone Marrow Transplant 50:209–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Marit G et al (2012) Lenalidomide maintenance after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 366:1782–1791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Palumbo A, Cavallo F, Gay F et al (2014) Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 371:895–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M et al (2012) Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 366:1759–1769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benboubker L, Dimopoulos MA, Dispenzieri A et al (2014) Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N Engl J Med 371:906–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Facon T, Mary JY, Hulin C et al (2007) Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): a randomised trial. Lancet 370:1209–1218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T et al (2006) Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 367:825–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liedke PE, Finkelstein DM, Szymonifka J et al (2014) Outcomes of breast cancer in Brazil related to health care coverage: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:126–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nardi AC, Reis RB, Zequi Sde C, Nardozza A Jr (2012) Comparison of the epidemiologic features and patterns of initial care for prostate cancer between public and private institutions: a survey by the Brazilian Society of Urology. Int Braz J Urol 38:155–164; discussion 164–156

  25. San Miguel JF, Schlag R, Khuageva NK et al (2008) Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 359:906–917

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fayers PM, Palumbo A, Hulin C et al (2011) Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials. Blood 118:1239–1247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hungria VT, Crusoe EQ, Maiolino A et al. (2016) Phase 3 trial of three thalidomide-containing regimens in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not transplant-eligible. Ann Hematol 95:271–278

  28. Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ et al (2014) Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia 28:1122–1128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saccilotto IC, Bittencourt RI, Fischer CC et al (2015) Efficacy of a referral center for patient-centered care in multiple myeloma: a cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 15:455

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vania T. M. Hungria.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hungria, V.T.M., Maiolino, A., Martinez, G. et al. Observational study of multiple myeloma in Latin America. Ann Hematol 96, 65–72 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-016-2866-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-016-2866-9

Keywords

Navigation