Skip to main content
Log in

Salvage treatment with upfront melphalan 100 mg/m2 and consolidation with novel drugs for fulminant progression of multiple myeloma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients (pts) with fulminant progression (FPG) of multiple myeloma (MM) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have poor prognosis. Pancytopenia, extramedullary disease, and/or renal impairment are often present, and treatment options are limited. We have retrospectively evaluated 31 pts with FPG of MM after ASCT who were treated upfront salvage therapy with melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL 100) followed by PBSC support and consolidation therapy using regimens containing thalidomide (n = 16) or bortezomib (n = 15). The overall response rate (ORR) was 58% (18/31). After MEL 100, one patient achieved complete remission (3%), 26% of pts very good partial remission, 29% of pts partial remission, and 42% of pts stable disease. Progression within 3 months after MEL 100 occurred in 35% of pts. The median follow-up from MEL 100 was 8 months. The median TTP was 5 months (range, 2–15 months), and the median OS was 8 months (range, 3–23 months). There were no treatment-related deaths. In fulminant progression of MM, upfront MEL 100 is a safe salvage regimen with good response rate (ORR, 58%). Treatment with upfront MEL 100 followed by a thalidomide- or bortezomib-based regimen can prolong overall survival to more than 12 months in 33% of pts with fulminant progression of MM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruno B, Rotta M, Giaccone L et al (2004) New drugs for treatment of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 5:430–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Palumbo A, Avonto I, Bruno B et al (2006) Intravenous melphalan, thalidomide and prednisone in refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 76:273–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palumbo A, Ambrosini MT, Benevolo G et al (2007) Bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide for relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood 109:2767–2672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zemanova M, Scudla V, Adam Z et al (2008) Low-dose thalidomide regimens in therapy of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Neoplasma 55:345–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Palumbo A, Avonto M, Bruno B et al (2006) Intermediate-dose melphalan (100 mg/m2)/bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone and stem cell support in patients with refractory or relapsed myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 6:475–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hajek R, Krejci M, Krivanova A et al (2007) Salvage treatment with melphalan 100 mg/m2 in fulminant progression of multiple myeloma. Haematologica 92(suppl):1, abstract 262

    Google Scholar 

  7. Durie B, Salmon S (1975) A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Cancer 36:842–854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG et al (2005) International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 23:3412–3420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blade J, Samson D, Reece D et al (1998) Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. Br J Haematol 102:1115–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS et al (2006) International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 20:1467–1473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart AK, Bergsagel PL, Greipp PR et al (2007) A practical guide to defining high-risk myeloma for clinical trials, patients counseling and choice of therapy. Leukemia 21:529–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common terminology criteria for adverse event v 3.0 DCTD, NCI, NIH, DHHD, 2003. URL http://ctep.cancer.gov.

  13. Lenhoff S, Hjorth M, Turesson I et al (2006) Intensive therapy for multiple myeloma in patients younger than 60 years. Long-term results focusing on the effect of the degree of response on survival and relapse pattern after transplantation. Haematologica 91:1228–1233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Palumbo A, Facon T, Sonneveld P et al (2008) Thalidomide for treatment of multiple myeloma: 10 years later. Blood 111:3968–3977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies FE, Wu P, Jenner M et al (2007) The combination of cyclophospshamide, velcade and dexamethasone induces high response rates with comparable toxicity to velcade alone and velcade plus dexamethasone. Haematologica 92:1149–1150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Garzia-Sanz R, Gonzalez-Porras JR, Hemandes JM et al (2004) The oral combination of thalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is effective in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia 18:856–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kyriakou C, Thomson K, D´Sa S et al (2005) Low dose thalidomide in combination with oral weekly cyclophosphamide and pulsed dexamethasone is a well tolerated and effective regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Hematol 129:763–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roussou M, Anagnostopoulos A, Kastritis E et al (2007) Pulsed cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone regimen for previously treated patients with multiple myeloma: long term follow up and disease control after subsequent treatments. Leuk Lymphoma 48:754–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. San-Miguel JF, Richardson PG, Sonneveld P et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in patients with renal impairment: results from the APEX phase 3 study. Leukemia 22:842–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tosi P, Zamagni E, Cellini C et al (2004) Thalidomide alone or in combination with dexamethasone in patients with advanced, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and renal failure. Eur J Haematol 73:98–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants IGA NR/9225-3 and IGA NR/9317-3 from the Department of Health, Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Krejci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krejci, M., Adam, Z., Buchler, T. et al. Salvage treatment with upfront melphalan 100 mg/m2 and consolidation with novel drugs for fulminant progression of multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 89, 483–487 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-009-0862-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-009-0862-z

Keywords

Navigation