Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of MTHFR polymorphisms and P16 methylation and their correlation with clinical–biological features of multiple myeloma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Low folate intake and changes in folate metabolism due to polymorphisms in the methylentetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene have been associated with myelomagenesis. However, controversial data have been published regarding a protective role of variant alleles of MTHFR on MM.

Patients and methods

To investigate the influence of two common polymorphisms of MTHFR C677T and A1298C on the risk of multiple myeloma (MM), we performed a matched case-control study. The methylation status pattern of p16 was also addressed.

Results

The frequency each of 677 CC, 677CT, and 677TT was 31, 44, and 25%, respectively, whereas, the frequency each of 1298 AA, AC, CC was 48, 44, and 8% in MM patients. In the control group, the frequency each of 677CC, 677CT, and 677TT was 36, 45, and 19%, respectively, while the frequency each of 1298 AA, AC, CC was 37, 50, and 13%, respectively. No significant association between susceptibility to MM, 677, and 1298 MTHFR variants was detected. As regards p16 methylation, we confirmed a high prevalence of p16 methylation (40%) in patients affected by MM and demonstrated that MTHFR 677CC is associated with a higher prevalence of p16 hypermethylation.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrated that variant alleles did not play a key role neither in protection nor in increased risk for MM, suggesting that the effect of MTHFR on folate metabolism might be modified by diet intake. Moreover, our findings demonstrated that p16 hypermethylation might be a frequent genetic aberration in MM and may contribute with other molecular aberrations in the pathogenesis of this malignant disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ueland PM, Hustad S, Schneede J et al (2001) Biological and clinical implications of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism. Trends Pharmacol Sci 22:195–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwahn B, Rozen R (2001) Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase: clinical consequences. Am J Pharmacogenomics 1:189–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Stefano V, Chiusolo P, Paciaroni K et al (1998) Prevalence of the 677C to T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene in Italian patients with venous thrombotic disease. Thromb Haemost 79:686–687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Papa A, de Stefano V, Danese S et al (2001) Hyperhomocisteinemia and prevalence of polymorphisms of homocisteine metabolism-related enzymes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2677–2682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Skibola CF, Smith MT, Kane E et al (1999) Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are associated with susceptibility to acute leukemia in adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:12810–12815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiusolo P, Reddiconto G, Cimino G et al (1999) Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotypes do not play a role in acute lymphoblastic leukemia pathogenesis in the Italian population. Haematologica 89:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gemmati D, Ongaro A, Scapoli GL et al (2004) Common gene polymorphisms in the metabolic folate and methylation pathway and the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in adults. Cancer Epidem Biomar 13:787–794

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Galm O, Wilop S, Reichelt J et al (2004) DNA methylation changes in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 18:1687–1692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R et al (1995) A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet 10:111–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weisberg I, Tran P, Christensen B et al (1998) A second genetic polymorphism in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) associated with decreased enzyme activity. Mol Genet Metab 64:169–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Toyota M, Kopecky J, Toyota MO et al (2001) Methylation profiling in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 97:2823–2829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez Ordonez AJ, Fernandez Carreira JM, Fernandez Alvarez CR et al (2000) Normal frequencies of the C677T genotypes on the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene among lymphoproliferative disorders but not in multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 39:607–612

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonzales-Fraile MI, Garcia-Sanz R, Mateos MV et al (2002) Methylentetrahydrofolate reductase genotype does not play a role in multiple myeloma pathogenesis. Br J Haematol 117:890–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yanamandra K, Bocchini JA, Thurmon TF (2003) Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase CC normal genotype may protect against multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 120:1089–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lincz LF, Scorgie FE, Kerridge I et al (2003) Methionine synthase genetic polymorphism MS A2756G alters susceptibility to follicular but not diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 120:1051–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng MH, Chung YF, Lo KW et al (1997) Frequent hypermethylation of p16 and p15 genes in multiple myeloma. Blood 89:2500–2506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tasaka T, Asou H, Munker R et al (1998) Methylation of the p16INK4a gene in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 101:558–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzalez M, Mateos MV, Garcia-Sanz R et al (2000) De novo methylation of tumor suppressor gene p16/INK4a is a frequent finding in multiple myeloma patients at diagnosis. Leukemia 14:183–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guillerm G, Gyan E, Wolowiec D et al (2001) p16 INK4a and p15 INK4b gene methylations in plasma cells from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood 98:244–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kramer A, Schultheis B, Bergmann J et al (2002) Alterations of the cyclin D1/pRb/p16(INK4a) pathway in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 16:1844–1851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mateos MV, Garcia-Sanz R, Lopez-Perez R et al (2002) Methylation is an inactivating mechanism of the p16 gene in multiple myeloma associated with high plasma cell proliferation and short survival. Br J Haematol 118:1034–1040

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mateos MV, Garcia-Sanz R, Lopez-Perez R et al (2001) p16/INK4a gene inactivation by hypermethylation is associated with aggressive variants of monoclonal gammopathies. Hematol J 2:146–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Guillerm G, Depil S, Wolowiec D, Quesnel B (2003) Different prognostic values of p15INK4b and p16INK4a gene methylation in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 88:476–478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seidi S, Ackermann J, Kaufmann H et al (2004) DNA methylation analysis identifies the E-Cadherin gene as a potential marker of disease progression inpatients with monoclonal gammopathies. Cancer 100:2598–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Francesco Bartolozzi for the statistical analysis. This work was supported in part by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrizia Chiusolo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiusolo, P., Farina, G., Putzulu, R. et al. Analysis of MTHFR polymorphisms and P16 methylation and their correlation with clinical–biological features of multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 85, 474–477 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-006-0097-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-006-0097-1

Keywords

Navigation