Skip to main content
Log in

Immunofluorescent analysis with the anti-PML monoclonal antibody PG-M3 for rapid and accurate genetic diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic diagnosis is currently considered the most reliable method to accurately identify patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) requiring tailored therapy including all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). We investigated the clinical effectiveness of immunofluorescence techniques with the anti-PML monoclonal antibody PG-M3 for rapid and accurate diagnosis of APL. PML immunofluorescence staining was analyzed in 164 patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML), including APL (110 patients) and non-APL subtypes (54 patients). All 54 patients with an AML phenotype, in whom tests for t(15;17) or its fusion gene PML/RARα were negative, showed a speckled (macrogranular) nuclear pattern. Of the 110 genetically diagnosed APL patients, 108 showed a microgranular pattern that confirmed PG-M3 positivity. The remaining two patients were not evaluable for PG-M3 reactivity because of scarcity of cells. No patient with APL showed a normal pattern. The high sensitivity and specificity of immunolabeling using PG-M3 monoclonal antibody show that it is a highly efficient and reliable tool to identify PML/RARα-positive patients with APL and that it should be standardized as a first-line diagnostic procedure. In addition, it is technically simple, fast, and cheap, only requiring small tissue samples and non-sophisticated equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lo Coco F, Diverio D, Falini B, Biondi A, Nervi C, Pelicci PG (1999) Genetic diagnosis and molecular monitoring in the management of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 94:12–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel MT, Koken M, Romagne O, Barbey S, Bazarbachi A, Stadler M et al (1993) PML protein expression in hematopoietic and acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Blood 82:1858–1867

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dyck JA, Warrell RPJ, Evans RM, Miller WH Jr (1995) Rapid diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia by immunohistochemical localization of PML/RAR-alpha protein. Blood 86:862–867

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Connor SJ, Forsyth PD, Dalal S, Evans PA, Short MA, Shiach C et al (1997) The rapid diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia using PML (5E10) monoclonal antibody. Br J Haematol 99:597–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flenghi L, Fagioli M, Tomassoni L, Pileri S, Gambacorta M, Pacini R et al (1995) Characterization of a monoclonal antibody (PG-M3) directed against the amino-terminal portion of PML gene product: immunocytochemical evidence for high expression of PML proteins on activated macrophages, endothelial cells, and epithelia. Blood 85:1871–1880

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falini B, Flenghi L, Fagioli M, Lo Coco F, Cordone I, Diverio D, et al. (1997) Immunocytochemical diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3) with the monoclonal antibody PG-M3 (Anti-PML). Blood 90:4046–4053

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Villamor N, Costa D, Aymerich M, Esteve J, Carrio A, Rozman M, et al. (2000) Rapid diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia by analyzing the immunocytochemical pattern of the PML protein with the monoclonal antibody PG-M3. Am J Clin Pathol 114:786–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Samoszuk MK, Tynan W, Sallash G, Nasr S, Monczak Y, Miller W (1998) An immunofluorescent assay for acute promyelocytic leukemia. Am J Clin Pathol 109:205–210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR, Sultan C (1985) Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French–American–British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med 103:620–625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hernández JM, Martín G, Gutiérrez NC, Cervera J, Ferro MT, Calasanz MJ, et al. (2001) Additional cytogenetic changes do not influence the outcome of patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with an ATRA plus anthracyclin based protocol. A report of the Spanish group PETHEMA. Haematologica 86:807–813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. ISCN (1995) Guidelines for cancer cytogenetics. In: Mitelman F (ed) Supplement to: an international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bolufer P, Barragán E, Sanz MA, Martín G, Bornstein R, Colomer D, et al. (1998) Preliminary experience in external quality control of RT-PCR PML/RARα detection in promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 12:2024–2028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the Spanish institutions that contributed to this study by sending diagnostic samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel A. Sanz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gomis, F., Sanz, J., Sempere, A. et al. Immunofluorescent analysis with the anti-PML monoclonal antibody PG-M3 for rapid and accurate genetic diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Ann Hematol 83, 687–690 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-004-0902-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-004-0902-7

Keywords

Navigation