Skip to main content
Log in

Tibial nerve branching pattern and compatibility of branches for the deep fibular nerve

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In individuals who develop drop foot due to nerve loss, several methods such as foot-leg orthosis, tendon transfer, and nerve grafting are used. Nerve transfer, on the other hand, has been explored in recent years. The purpose of this study was to look at the tibial nerve’s branching pattern and the features of its branches in order to determine the suitability of the tibial nerve motor branches, particularly the plantaris muscle motor nerve, for deep fibular nerve transfer.

Methods

There were 36 fixed cadavers used. Tibial nerve motor branches were observed and measured, as were the lengths, distributions, and thicknesses of the common fibular nerve and its branches at the bifurcation region.

Result

The motor branches of the tibial nerve that supply the soleus muscle, lateral head, and medial head of the gastrocnemius were studied, and three distinct forms of distribution were discovered. The motor branch of the gastrocnemius medial head was commonly observed as the first branch to divide, and it appeared as a single root. The nerve of the plantaris muscle was shown to be split from many origins. When the thickness and length of the motor branches measured were compared, the nerve of the soleus muscle was determined to be the most physically suited for neurotization.

Conclusion

In today drop foot is very common. Traditional methods of treatment are insufficient. Nerve transfer is viewed as an application that can both improve patient outcomes and hasten the patient’s return to society. The nerve of the soleus muscle was shown to be the best candidate for transfer in our investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bhandari PS (2019) Management of peripheral nerve injury. J Clin Orthop Trauma 10:862–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.08

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodily KD, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT (2004) Restoration of motor function of the Deep Fibular (Peroneal) nerve by direct nerve transfer of branches from the tibial nerve: an anatomical study. 205:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10189

  3. Cai Y, Hou C (2015) A feasıbılıty study on transposıtıon of proxımal motor branches from tıbıal nerve to reconstruct deep fıbular nerve. Chin J Reparative Reconstr Surg 29:58–62

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Bruijn IL, Geertzen JHB, Dijkstra PU (2007) Functional outcome after peroneal nerve injury. Int J Rehabil Res 30:333–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282f14444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Taher M, Sallam A, Saleh M, Metwally A (2021) Foot Reanimation using double nerve transfer to deep peroneal nerve: a novel technique for treatment of neurologic Foot Drop. Foot Ankle Int Aug 42(8):1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100721997798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farber SJ, Glaus SW, Moore AM et al (2013) Supercharge nerve transfer to enhance motor recovery: a laboratory study. J Hand Surg 38:466–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferris S, Maciburko SJ (2017) Partial tibial nerve transfer to tibialis anterior for traumatic peroneal nerve palsy. Microsurgery 37:596–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Flores LP, Martins RS, Siqueira MG (2013) Clinical results of transferring a motor branch of the tibial nerve to the deep peroneal nerve for treatment of foot drop. Neurosurgery 73:609–615. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flores LP (2009) Proximal motor branches from the tibial nerve as direct donors to restore function of the deep fibular nerve for treatment of high sciatic nerve injuries: a cadaveric feasibility study. Neurosurgery 65 (6 Suppl):218 – 24; discussion 224-5. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000346329.90517.79

  10. Fu SY, Gordon T (1995) Contributing factors to poor functional recovery after delayed nerve repair: prolonged denervation. J Neurosci 15:3886–3895. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.15-05-03886.1995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Garozzo D, Ferraresi S, Buffatti P (2004) Surgical treatment of common peroneal nerve injuries: indications and results. A series of 62 cases. J Neurosurg Sci 48:105–112 discussion 112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giuffre JL, Bishop AT, Spinner RJ, Levy BA, Shin AY (2012) Partial tibial nerve transfer to the tibialis anterior motor branch to treat peroneal nerve injury after knee trauma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(3):779–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1924-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giuffre JL, Bishop AT, Spinner RJ, Shin AY (2012) Surgical technique of a partial tibial nerve transfer to the tibialis anterior motor branch for the treatment of peroneal nerve injury. Ann Plast Surg 69(1):48–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824c94e5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gousheh J, Babaei A (2002) A new surgical technique for the treatment of high common peroneal nerve palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:994–998. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200203000-00030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grinsell D, Keating CP (2014) Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies. BioMed research international, 2014, 698256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/698256

  16. Head LK, Hicks K, Wolff G, Boyd KU (2019) Clinical outcomes of nerve transfers in peroneal nerve palsy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 35:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishii T, Kawagishi K, Hayashi S et al (2023) A novel categorization of the muscular branches of the tibial nerve within the popliteal fossa. Ann Anat 245:151997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2022.151997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim DH, Han K, Tiel RL et al (2003) Surgical outcomes of 654 ulnar nerve lesions. J Neurosurg 98:993–1004. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurtys K, Gonera B, Olewnik et al (2021) Is the plantaris muscle the most undefined human skeletal muscle? Anat Sci Int 96:477–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-020-00586-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leclère FM, Badur N, Mathys L, Vögelin E (2015) Nerve transfers for Persistent traumatic peroneal nerve Palsy: the Inselspital Bern Experience. Neurosurgery 77:572–579. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL, O’Brien JP et al (1989) Selection of optimal axon ratio for nerve regeneration. Ann Plast Surg 23:129–134. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198908000-00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meng D, Chen H, Lin Y et al (2019) Transferring of femoral nerve motor branches for high-level sciatic nerve injury: a cadaver feasibility study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 161:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3746-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore AM, Krauss EM, Parikh RP et al (2018) Femoral nerve transfers for restoring tibial nerve function: an anatomical study and clinical correlation: a report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg 129:1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.JNS163076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nath RK, Lyons AB, Sc B et al (2008) Successful management of Foot Drop by nerve transfers to the deep peroneal nerve. 1:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082894

  25. Rasulic L, Samardzic M (2015) Nerve grafting methods. Elsevier Ltd.

  26. Sallam AA, El-Deeb MS, Imam MA (2017) Nerve transfer versus nerve graft for Reconstruction of High Ulnar nerve injuries. J Hand Surg 42:265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Steinau H, Tofaute A, Huellmann K et al (2011) Tendon transfers for drop foot correction: long-term results including quality of life assessment, and dynamometric and pedobarographic measurements. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:903–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1231-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Verstraete MA, Van Der Straeten C, De Lepeleere B, Opsomer GJ, Van Hoof T, Victor J (2015) Impact of drying and thiel embalming on mechanical properties of achilles tendons. Clin Anat 28:994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Watabe LT, dos Santos PVB, Mendes F de A et al (2021) Fibular nerve repair by lateral sural cutaneous nerve graft: anatomic feasibility study and clinical results. World Neurosurg 146:e537–e543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.10.127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. White CP, Cooper MJ, Bain JR, Levis CM (2012) Axon counts of potential nerve transfer donors for peroneal nerve reconstruction. Can J Plast Surg 20:24–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/229255031202000104

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All authors wrote the main manuscript text, M.Y. prepared figures. M.Y. and A.F.E. performed the dissections. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Yilmaz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and informed consent

This is a cadaveric and radiological study, and all cadavers were supplied from a donated institution with subjects giving written informed consent for the use of samples in scientific studies. All the performed procedures in this study that involved cadavers followed the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Cadaveric data were collected after approval from the Ankara University ethics committee (approval date and number: 25.11.2020 - İ10-646-20).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects included in the study.

Consent to publish

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images as figures.

Competing interests

All authors certify no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Our work has not been presented in whole or in part in any scientific institution.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yilmaz, M., Gungor, Y., Salman, N. et al. Tibial nerve branching pattern and compatibility of branches for the deep fibular nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 46, 413–424 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-024-03329-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-024-03329-6

Keywords

Navigation