Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measurements of oculo-palpebral landmarks and evaluation of patient’s head position

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Keeping the head in a neutral position is requisite for glasses/lenses/head-up designs, the suitability of oculo-plastic surgery and for the grading the eye shift. Anatomically incompatible glasses are one of the common problems affecting accommodation, reducing comfort and disturbing by causing symptoms such as dizziness and nausea. The oculo-palpebral measurements act as a key determinant in symmetrical facial attractiveness. This study aims to investigate the most effective oculo-palpebral landmarks, head-neutral as the ideal position, taking into account of individual anatomical differences of these patients.

Methods

100 females and 100 males aged between 18 and 20 years were photographed. Digital photogrammetric measurements were made with the ImageJ program. Interpupillary and interhelical distances, besides bilateral palpebral fissure length and height, and iris diameter were calculated on front-facing photographs.

Results

Mean interpupillary distance was measured wider in males than in females. The mean length of palpebral fissure was 31 mm; palpebral fissure height was 10 mm. These figures were valid in both eyes and gender. The interhelical distance was calculated as the mean and was measured longer in men. Since the measurement values were the same in both sexes and on both sides, they were determined as important landmarks for controlling the head-neutral position, evaluating whether there was a deviation in the eye, and measuring the numerical value when detected.

Conclusion

It is essential to check the side-symmetry of the patient’s palpebral fissure height, palpebral fissure length, diameter of iris and corneal depth during oculo-plastic invention and artificial design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angell B, Ali F, Gandhi M, Mathur U, Friedman D, Jan S, Keay L (2018) Ready-made and custom-made eyeglasses in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 9:e000123. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2017-000123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atchison DA, Markwell EL, Kasthurirangan S, Pope JM, Smith G, Swann PG (2008) Age related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of metropic eyes. J Vis 28:291–220. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.4.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van den Bosch WA, Leenders I, Mulder P (1999) Topographic anatomy of the eyelids, and the effects of sex and age. Br J Ophthalmol 83:347–352. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.3.347

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Botti G, Botti C, Rossati L, Gualdi A, Nocini P, Nocini R, Bertossi D (2019) Dynamic canthopexy drill hole canthal repositioning. Aesthet Surg J 39:1284–1294. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Boyle KH, Gallagher FD, O’Sullivan M, McDevitt WE (1996) The effect of posture change on the position of the skin marks for the transverse horizontal axis. J Prosthet Dent 75:545–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90461-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cetinkaya A, Kersten RC (2012) Surgical outcomes in patients with bilateral ptosis and Hering’s dependence. Ophthalmology 119:376–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Arnarsson A, Sasaki H, Sasaki K (2005) Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:734–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00540.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Finsterer J (2003) Ptosis: causes, presentation, and management. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-0127-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gessesse GW, Debela AS, Anbesse DH (2020) Ocular biometry and their correlations with ocular and anthropometric measurements among Ethiopian adults. Clin Ophthalmol 15:3363–3369. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S277359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanada AL, Junior EN, Moribe I, Cruz AA (2001) Comparison of palpebral fissure obliquity in three different racial groups. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 17:423–426. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-200111000-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey DJ, Iamphongsai S, Gosain AK (2010) Unilateral congenital blepharoptosis repair by anterior levator advancement and resection: an educational review. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(4):1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ebe1e9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hellström A, Svensson E (1998) Optic disc size and retinal vessel characteristics in healthy children. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:260–267. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760302.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iosub S, Fuchs M, Bingol N, Stone RK, Gromisch DS, Wasserman E (1985) Palpebral fissure length in black and hispanic children: correlation with head circumference. Pediatrics 75:318–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ip JM, Huynh SC, Kifley A, Rose KA, Morgan IG, Varma R, Mitchell P (2007) Variation of the contribution from axial length and other oculometric parameters to refraction by age and ethnicity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:4846–4853. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeong S, Lemke BN, Dortzbach RK (1999) Reoperation in acquired involutional ptosis. Korean J Ophthalmol 13:125–127. https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.1999.13.2.125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim MJ, Oh TS (2019) Treatment for ophthalmic paralysis: functional and aesthetic optimization. Arch Craniofac Surg 20(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2019.00066

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsuo K (2002) Stretching of the Mueller muscle results in involuntary contraction of the levator muscle. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 18:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-200201000-00002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsuo K (2003) Restoration of involuntary tonic contraction of the levator muscle in patients with aponeurotic blepharoptosis or Horner syndrome by aponeurotic advancement using the orbital septum. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 37:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310310005603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mehta VJ, Perry JD (2013) Blepharoptosis repair outcomes from trainee versus experienced staffas the primary surgeon. Am J Ophthalmol 155:397–403e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.08.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishioka H, Kondoh S, Yuzuriha S (2019) Differences in palpebral fissure height depending on patient’s intraoperative head position. JPRAS Open 20:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2019.03.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nowaczewska W, Lapicka U, Cieślik A, Biecek P (2017) The relationship of cranial, orbital and nasal cavity size with the morphology of the supraorbital region in modern Homo sapiens. Anthropol Anz 74:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/2017/0729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ojaimi E, Rose KA, Morgan IG, Smith W, Martin FJ, Kifley A, Robaei D, Mitchell P (2005) Distribution of ocular biometric parameters and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:2748–2754. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pagarkar W, Bamiou DE, Ridout D, Luxon LM (2008) Subjective visual vertical and horizontal: Effect of the preset angle. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Sur 134:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.134.4.394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Park DH, Jung JM, Choi WS, Song CH (2006) Early postoperative adjustment of blepharoptosis. Ann Plast Surg 57:376–380. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000237056.72643.20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Raffa LH, Hellstrom A, Aring E, Andersson S, Grönlund AM (2014) Ocular dimensions in relation to auxological data in a sample of Swedish children aged 4–15 years. Acta Ophthalmol 92:682–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rubin KM, DeLeon VB (2017) Ancestral variation in orbital rim shape: a three-dimensional pilot study. J Forensic Sci 62:1575–1581. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sefi-Yurdakul N, Kaykisiz H, Koc F (2019) The effects of partial and full correction of refractive errors on sensorial and motor outcomes in children with refractive accommodative esotropia. Int Ophthalmol 39:883–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0889-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seo MG, Chung KJ, Kim YH (2023) Post-traumatic telecanthus induced by a missed diagnosis of avulsion fracture of the medial canthal tendon. J Craniofac Surg 34(4):406–408. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shufelt C, Fraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Torres M, Varma R (2005) Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the Los Angeles latino eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:4450–4460. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sultana R, Matsuo K, Yuzuriha S, Kushima H (2000) Disinsertion of the levator aponeurosis from the tarsus in growing children. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:563–570. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200009030-00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takahagi RU, Schellini SA, Padovani CR, Ideta S, Katori N, Nakamura Y (2008) Oriental oculopalpebral dimensions: quantitative comparison between orientals from Japan and Brazil. Clin Ophthalmol 2:563–567. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s1703

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Takahashi Y, Kakizaki H, Mito H, Shiraki K (2007) Assessment of the predictive value of intraoperative eyelid height measurements in sitting and supine positions during blepharoptosis repair. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 23:119–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e318032eb00

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vasanthakumar P, Kumar P, Rao M (2013) Anthropometric analysis of palpebral fissure dimensions and its position in south Indian ethnic adults. Oman Med J 28:26–32. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2013.06

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang C, Winnick AA, Ko Y, Wang Z, Chang T (2021) Test-retest reliability of subjective visual vertical measurements with lateral head tilt in virtual reality goggles. Tzu Chi Med J 33:294–300. https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_207_20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wei JJ, Tang ZL, Liu L, Liao XJ, Yu YB, Jing W (2015) The management of naso-orbital-ethmoid (NOE) fractures. Chin J Traumatol 18:296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.07.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Winters R (2016) Tessier Clefts and hypertelorism. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 24:545–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2016.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Klein BE, Seah SK (2001) The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the Tanjong Pagar Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1237–1242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu KH, Tsai FJ, Li TC, Tsai CH, Peng CT, Wang TR (2000) Normal values of inner canthal distance, interpupillary distance and palpebral fissure length in normal Chinese children in Taiwan. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 41:22–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yano S, Hirose M, Nakada T, Nakayama J, Matsuo K, Yamada M (2010) Selective alpha 1A-adrenoceptor stimulation induces Mueller’s smooth muscle contraction in an isolated canine upper eyelid preparation. Curr Eye Res 35:363–369. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713680903518858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yuzuriha S, Matsuo K, Ishigaki Y, Kikuchi N, Kawagishi K, Moriizumi T (2005) Efferent and afferent innervations of Mueller’s muscle related to involuntary contraction of the levator muscle: important for avoiding injury during eyelid surgery. Br J Plast Surg 58:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2004.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yuzuriha S, Matsuo K, Hirasawa C, Moriizumi T (2009) Refined distribution of myelinated trigeminal proprioceptive nerve fibres in Mueller’s muscle as the mechanoreceptors to induce involuntary reflexive contraction of the levator and frontalis muscles. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1403–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou L, Chen C, Wu Y, Zhang Z, Wang K, Yu B, Li Y (2017) See-through near-eye displays enabling vision correction. Opt Express 25:2130–2142. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.25.002130

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors reported no funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.G, S.S., and I.C.Conceptualization, ; SS. and I.C.; methodology, , S.S.; formal analysis , F.G, S.S., and I.C.investigation; , F.G, S.S., A.B. A.B. and I.C, writing-original draft preparation writing-review and editing, F.G, S.S., A.B. and I.C.; supervision, F.G, A.B. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Figen Govsa.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ege University Ethics Committee (16.05.2014: 659/311).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sirinturk, S., Govsa, F., Coban, I. et al. Measurements of oculo-palpebral landmarks and evaluation of patient’s head position. Surg Radiol Anat (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-024-03324-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-024-03324-x

Keywords

Navigation