Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human navicular bone: a morphometric and morphological evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The composition of navicular joint complex is crucial to perform surgical interventions for multiple pathological foot aetiologies. The data on human navicular bone and its facets from Indian population remain scarce in literature.

Aims and objectives

To evaluate the morphometry and morphology of navicular bone.

Methodology

A total of 77 (right: 40; left: 37) dried human navicular bones were used. The collected data were entered and analysed in SPSS software.

Results

The anteroposterior diameter of navicular bone on right side was 15.19 mm (13.92, 16.77) and on left side was 15.87 mm (13.83, 17.27). The transverse diameter on right and left sides were 34.21 mm (31.74, 36.6) and 33.59 mm (30.23, 35.43), respectively. The vertical diameter measured on the right was 22.31 mm (21.19, 23.94) and on left 22.53 mm (20.8, 24.24). Morphometric evaluation showed no significant difference between right and left navicular bones. The commonest shape for posterior facet was quadrilateral, on the right (62.5%) and left (40.5%). The most common shape of anterior facet for medial cuneiform is quadrilateral, on the right (85%) and left (89.1%). For intermediate cuneiform, triangular facet was common on the right side (72.5%) and on the left (59.5%). The lateral cuneiform facet was bean shaped on right side (72.5%) and quadrilateral on the left side (32.5%). There was a significant difference in shape distribution between right and left (P < 0.05). The median length of the groove for tibialis posterior tendon was 18.01 mm and 16.19 mm on right and left side, respectively. Cuboid facet was observed in 28 (70%) and 26 (65.9%) navicular bones on right and left sides, respectively.

Conclusion

There is no significant difference between right and left bones with regards to morphometric parameters. Morphological evaluation revealed significant difference in the distribution of shape between right and left bones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

References

  1. Chan JY, Young JL (2019) Köhler disease. Avascular necrosis in the child. Foot Ankle Clin 24(1):83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DiGiovanni CW (2004) Fractures of the navicular. Foot Ankle Clin 9(1):25–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gheewala R, Arain A, Rosenbaum AJ. (2023) Tarsal Navicular Fractures. In: Stat Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542221/

  4. Golano P, Fariñas O, Sáenz I (2004) The anatomy of the navicular and periarticular structures. Foot Ankle Clin 9(1):1–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaye RA, Jahss MH (1991) Tibialis posterior: a review of anatomy and biomechanics in relation to support of the medial longitudinal arch. Foot Ankle 11(4):244–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitaura Y, Nishimura A, Nakazora S, Fukuda A, Senga Y, Kato K, Sudo A (2019) Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the tarsal navicular: a report of two cases. Case Rep Orthop 30:5952435

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manners-Smith T (1907) A study of the navicular in the human and anthropoid foot. J Anat Physiol 41(Pt 4):255–279

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Marshall D, MacFarlane RJ, Molloy A, Mason L (2020) A review of the management and outcomes of tarsal navicular fracture. Foot Ankle Surg 26(5):480–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peeters K, Schreuer J, Burg F, Behets C, Van Bouwel S, Dereymaeker G et al (2013) Alterated talar and navicular bone morphology is associated with pes planus deformity: a CT-scan study. J Orthop Res 31(2):282–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perisano C, Greco T, Vitiello R, Maccauro G, Liuzza F, Tamburelli FC, Forconi F (2018) Mueller-Weiss disease: review of the literature. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 32(6 Suppl. 1):157–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Renner K, McAlister JE, Galli MM, Hyer CF (2017) Anatomic description of the naviculocuneiform articulation. J Foot Ankle Surg 56(1):19–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saldías E, Malgosa A, Jordana X, Isidro A (2019) Morphological and biomechanical implications of cuboid facet of the navicular bone in the gait. Int J Morphol 37(4):1397–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Samim M, Moukaddam HA, Smitaman E (2016) Imaging of Mueller-Weiss syndrome: a review of clinical presentations and imaging spectrum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207(2):W8–W18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith CF (1999) Anatomy, function, and pathophysiology of the posterior tibial tendon. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 16(3):399–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Trammell AP, Davis DD, Scott AT. Kohler Disease. (2023). In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan–. PMID: 29939608

  16. Tuthill HL, Finkelstein ER, Sanchez AM, Clifford PD, Subhawong TK, Jose J (2014) Imaging of tarsal navicular disorders: a pictorial review. Foot Ankle Spec 7(3):211–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, 605006, India

    Nandini Rajaram & Suman Verma

  2. Department of Anatomy, Saveetha Medical college, Chennai, India

    S. Srinivasan

Authors
  1. Nandini Rajaram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Srinivasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suman Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NR and SS collected the data, reviewed the literature and drafted the manuscript. NR performed the data analysis. SV critically revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to review of literature, drafting of the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript. SV shall act as guarantor of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suman Verma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

None stated.

Ethics approval

Waiver of consent approval was obtained from Institute ethics committee and the study was performed in accordance to ethical standards laid by declaration of Helsinki 1964.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajaram, N., Srinivasan, S. & Verma, S. Human navicular bone: a morphometric and morphological evaluation. Surg Radiol Anat 46, 71–79 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03259-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03259-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation