Abstract
Aims
The greater palatine artery (GPA) is one of the most important anatomical structure for free gingival grafts or connective-tissue grafts during soft tissue surgery for dental implants. Several studies have identified the approximate location of the GPA, but it is impossible to detect its exact location during surgery due to large variability between individuals. The authors, therefore, investigated the course of the GPA using intraoral ultrasonography to determine the feasibility of using real-time nonionizing ultrasonography for implant surgery.
Materials and methods
This study included 40 healthy young participants. The courses of the GPA were identified using intraoral ultrasound probes from the first premolar to the second molar. The distance from the gingival margin to the GPA (GM-GPA) and the depth of the palatal gingiva from the GPA (PG-GPA) were measured by two independent examiners. Measurements were analyzed statistically, and interexaminer reliability was determined.
Results
The distance of the GM-GPA and the mean depth of the PG-GPA were 14.8 ± 1.6 mm and 4.10 ± 0.51 mm (mean ± SD), respectively. GM-GPA decreased when the GPA ran from the second molar to the first molar, and GM-GPA was significantly shorter in females (P < 0.05). PG-GPA increased when the GPA ran to the posterior teeth. Interexaminer measurement agreements were excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficient values of 0.983 and 0.918 for GM-GPA and PG-GPA, respectively.
Conclusions
Using an intraoral ultrasound probe, real-time GPA tracking is possible, which is expected to help reduce the possibility of bleeding during surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelopoulos C, Aghaloo T (2011) Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Dent Clin North Am 55(1):141–158
Ariji E, Ariji Y, Yoshiura K, Kimura S, Horinouchi Y, Kanda S (1994) Ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory changes in the masseter muscle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78(6):797–801
Ariji Y, Katsumata A, Hiraiwa Y, Izumi M, Sakuma S, Shimizu M, Kurita K, Ariji E (2010) Masseter muscle sonographic features as indices for evaluating efficacy of massage treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110(4):517–526
Ariji Y, Ohki M, Eguchi K, Izumi M, Ariji E, Mizokami A, Nagataki S, Nakamura T (1996) Texture analysis of sonographic features of the parotid gland in Sjogren’s syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166(4):935–941
Bahsi I, Orhan M, Kervancioglu P, Yalcin ED (2019) Morphometric evaluation and clinical implications of the greater palatine foramen, greater palatine canal and pterygopalatine fossa on CBCT images and review of literature. Surg Radiol Anat 41(5):551–567
Benninger B, Andrews K, Carter W (2012) Clinical measurements of hard palate and implications for subepithelial connective tissue grafts with suggestions for palatal nomenclature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(1):149–153
Bornstein MM, Horner K (2000) Jacobs R (2017) Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Periodontol 73(1):51–72
Chackartchi T, Romanos GE (2000) Sculean A (2019) Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants. Periodontol 81(1):124–138
Fu JH, Hasso DG, Yeh CY, Leong DJ, Chan HL, Wang HL (2011) The accuracy of identifying the greater palatine neurovascular bundle: a cadaver study. J Periodontol 82(7):1000–1006
Ghorayeb SR, Bertoncini CA, Hinders MK (2008) Ultrasonography in dentistry. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 55(6):1256–1266
Greenstein G, Cavallaro J (2011) The clinical significance of keratinized gingiva around dental implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent 32(8):24–31 (quiz 32, 34)
Griffin TJ, Cheung WS, Zavras AI, Damoulis PD (2006) Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J Periodontol 77(12):2070–2079
Hafeez NS, Sondekoppam RV, Ganapathy S, Armstrong JE, Shimizu M, Johnson M, Merrifield P, Galil KA (2014) Ultrasound-guided greater palatine nerve block: a case series of anatomical descriptions and clinical evaluations. Anesth Analg 119(3):726–730
Hilgenfeld T, Kastel T, Heil A, Rammelsberg P, Heiland S, Bendszus M, Schwindling FS (2018) High-resolution dental magnetic resonance imaging for planning palatal graft surgery–a clinical pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 45(4):462–470
Keceli HG, Aylikci BU, Koseoglu S, Dolgun A (2015) Evaluation of palatal donor site haemostasis and wound healing after free gingival graft surgery. J Clin Periodontol 42(6):582–589
Klosek SK, Rungruang T (2009) Anatomical study of the greater palatine artery and related structures of the palatal vault: considerations for palate as the subepithelial connective tissue graft donor site. Surg Radiol Anat 31(4):245–250
Lee KH, Jeong HG, Kwak EJ, Park W, Kim KD (2018) Ultrasound guided free gingival graft: case report. J Oral Implantol 44(5):385–388
Marotti J, Heger S, Tinschert J, Tortamano P, Chuembou F, Radermacher K, Wolfart S (2013) Recent advances of ultrasound imaging in dentistry–a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115(6):819–832
Miller PD Jr (1987) Root coverage with the free gingival graft factors associated with incomplete coverage. J Periodontol 58(10):674–681
Monnet-Corti V, Santini A, Glise JM, Fouque-Deruelle C, Dillier FL, Liebart MF, Borghetti A (2006) Connective tissue graft for gingival recession treatment: assessment of the maximum graft dimensions at the palatal vault as a donor site. J Periodontol 77(5):899–902
Monsour PA, Dudhia R (2008) Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Dent J 53(Suppl 1):S11-25
Moraschini V, Luz D, Velloso G, Barboza EDP (2017) Quality assessment of systematic reviews of the significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(6):774–781
Paolantonio M, di Murro C, Cattabriga A, Cattabriga M (1997) Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 24(1):51–56
Reiser GM, Bruno JF, Mahan PE, Larkin LH (1996) The subepithelial connective tissue graft palatal donor site: anatomic considerations for surgeons. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 16(2):130–137
Schroder AGD, de Araujo CM, Guariza-Filho O, Flores-Mir C, de Luca CG, Porporatti AL (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in the detection of calcified carotid artery atheroma: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 23(5):2021–2040
Shimizu M, Okamura K, Kise Y, Takeshita Y, Furuhashi H, Weerawanich W, Moriyama M, Ohyama Y, Furukawa S, Nakamura S, Yoshiura K (2015) Effectiveness of imaging modalities for screening IgG4-related dacryoadenitis and sialadenitis (Mikulicz’s disease) and for differentiating it from Sjogren’s syndrome (SS), with an emphasis on sonography. Arthritis Res Ther 17:223
Song GG, Lee YH (2014) Diagnostic accuracies of sialography and salivary ultrasonography in Sjogren’s syndrome patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 32(4):516–522
Song JE, Um YJ, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS, Kim CK, Chai JK, Jung UW (2008) Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of computerized tomography. J Periodontol 79(3):406–412
Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Ravida A, Oh TJ, Wang HL (2019) What Is the safety zone for palatal soft tissue graft harvesting based on the locations of the greater palatine artery and foramen? a Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77(2):271–271
Tucunduva MJ, Tucunduva-Neto R, Saieg M, Costa AL, de Freitas C (2016) Vascular mapping of the face: B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 21(2):e135-141
Yu SK, Lee MH, Park BS, Jeon YH, Chung YY, Kim HJ (2014) Topographical relationship of the greater palatine artery and the palatal spine. Significance for periodontal surgery. J Clin Periodontol 41(9):908–913
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KDK and WP conceived the ideas and research design of the study; KL and JC contributed on data acquisition; KP and JK analyzed and interpreted the data; KL and WP wrote initial draft; KL, WP, KP, JC, JK, and KK critically reviewed and revised the manuscript; all the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare. We have no specific funding source. We got institutional review board (IRB) from Dental Hospital, Yonsei University.
Data availability
The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, KH., Park, W., Cheong, J. et al. Identifying the course of the greater palatine artery using intraoral ultrasonography: cohort study. Surg Radiol Anat 44, 1139–1146 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02967-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02967-y