Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying the course of the greater palatine artery using intraoral ultrasonography: cohort study

  • Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

The greater palatine artery (GPA) is one of the most important anatomical structure for free gingival grafts or connective-tissue grafts during soft tissue surgery for dental implants. Several studies have identified the approximate location of the GPA, but it is impossible to detect its exact location during surgery due to large variability between individuals. The authors, therefore, investigated the course of the GPA using intraoral ultrasonography to determine the feasibility of using real-time nonionizing ultrasonography for implant surgery.

Materials and methods

This study included 40 healthy young participants. The courses of the GPA were identified using intraoral ultrasound probes from the first premolar to the second molar. The distance from the gingival margin to the GPA (GM-GPA) and the depth of the palatal gingiva from the GPA (PG-GPA) were measured by two independent examiners. Measurements were analyzed statistically, and interexaminer reliability was determined.

Results

The distance of the GM-GPA and the mean depth of the PG-GPA were 14.8 ± 1.6 mm and 4.10 ± 0.51 mm (mean ± SD), respectively. GM-GPA decreased when the GPA ran from the second molar to the first molar, and GM-GPA was significantly shorter in females (P < 0.05). PG-GPA increased when the GPA ran to the posterior teeth. Interexaminer measurement agreements were excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficient values of 0.983 and 0.918 for GM-GPA and PG-GPA, respectively.

Conclusions

Using an intraoral ultrasound probe, real-time GPA tracking is possible, which is expected to help reduce the possibility of bleeding during surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angelopoulos C, Aghaloo T (2011) Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Dent Clin North Am 55(1):141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ariji E, Ariji Y, Yoshiura K, Kimura S, Horinouchi Y, Kanda S (1994) Ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory changes in the masseter muscle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78(6):797–801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ariji Y, Katsumata A, Hiraiwa Y, Izumi M, Sakuma S, Shimizu M, Kurita K, Ariji E (2010) Masseter muscle sonographic features as indices for evaluating efficacy of massage treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110(4):517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ariji Y, Ohki M, Eguchi K, Izumi M, Ariji E, Mizokami A, Nagataki S, Nakamura T (1996) Texture analysis of sonographic features of the parotid gland in Sjogren’s syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166(4):935–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bahsi I, Orhan M, Kervancioglu P, Yalcin ED (2019) Morphometric evaluation and clinical implications of the greater palatine foramen, greater palatine canal and pterygopalatine fossa on CBCT images and review of literature. Surg Radiol Anat 41(5):551–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Benninger B, Andrews K, Carter W (2012) Clinical measurements of hard palate and implications for subepithelial connective tissue grafts with suggestions for palatal nomenclature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(1):149–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bornstein MM, Horner K (2000) Jacobs R (2017) Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Periodontol 73(1):51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chackartchi T, Romanos GE (2000) Sculean A (2019) Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants. Periodontol 81(1):124–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu JH, Hasso DG, Yeh CY, Leong DJ, Chan HL, Wang HL (2011) The accuracy of identifying the greater palatine neurovascular bundle: a cadaver study. J Periodontol 82(7):1000–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghorayeb SR, Bertoncini CA, Hinders MK (2008) Ultrasonography in dentistry. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 55(6):1256–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J (2011) The clinical significance of keratinized gingiva around dental implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent 32(8):24–31 (quiz 32, 34)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS, Zavras AI, Damoulis PD (2006) Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J Periodontol 77(12):2070–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hafeez NS, Sondekoppam RV, Ganapathy S, Armstrong JE, Shimizu M, Johnson M, Merrifield P, Galil KA (2014) Ultrasound-guided greater palatine nerve block: a case series of anatomical descriptions and clinical evaluations. Anesth Analg 119(3):726–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hilgenfeld T, Kastel T, Heil A, Rammelsberg P, Heiland S, Bendszus M, Schwindling FS (2018) High-resolution dental magnetic resonance imaging for planning palatal graft surgery–a clinical pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 45(4):462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keceli HG, Aylikci BU, Koseoglu S, Dolgun A (2015) Evaluation of palatal donor site haemostasis and wound healing after free gingival graft surgery. J Clin Periodontol 42(6):582–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Klosek SK, Rungruang T (2009) Anatomical study of the greater palatine artery and related structures of the palatal vault: considerations for palate as the subepithelial connective tissue graft donor site. Surg Radiol Anat 31(4):245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee KH, Jeong HG, Kwak EJ, Park W, Kim KD (2018) Ultrasound guided free gingival graft: case report. J Oral Implantol 44(5):385–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marotti J, Heger S, Tinschert J, Tortamano P, Chuembou F, Radermacher K, Wolfart S (2013) Recent advances of ultrasound imaging in dentistry–a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115(6):819–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller PD Jr (1987) Root coverage with the free gingival graft factors associated with incomplete coverage. J Periodontol 58(10):674–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Monnet-Corti V, Santini A, Glise JM, Fouque-Deruelle C, Dillier FL, Liebart MF, Borghetti A (2006) Connective tissue graft for gingival recession treatment: assessment of the maximum graft dimensions at the palatal vault as a donor site. J Periodontol 77(5):899–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Monsour PA, Dudhia R (2008) Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Dent J 53(Suppl 1):S11-25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Moraschini V, Luz D, Velloso G, Barboza EDP (2017) Quality assessment of systematic reviews of the significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46(6):774–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Paolantonio M, di Murro C, Cattabriga A, Cattabriga M (1997) Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 24(1):51–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reiser GM, Bruno JF, Mahan PE, Larkin LH (1996) The subepithelial connective tissue graft palatal donor site: anatomic considerations for surgeons. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 16(2):130–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schroder AGD, de Araujo CM, Guariza-Filho O, Flores-Mir C, de Luca CG, Porporatti AL (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in the detection of calcified carotid artery atheroma: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 23(5):2021–2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shimizu M, Okamura K, Kise Y, Takeshita Y, Furuhashi H, Weerawanich W, Moriyama M, Ohyama Y, Furukawa S, Nakamura S, Yoshiura K (2015) Effectiveness of imaging modalities for screening IgG4-related dacryoadenitis and sialadenitis (Mikulicz’s disease) and for differentiating it from Sjogren’s syndrome (SS), with an emphasis on sonography. Arthritis Res Ther 17:223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song GG, Lee YH (2014) Diagnostic accuracies of sialography and salivary ultrasonography in Sjogren’s syndrome patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 32(4):516–522

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Song JE, Um YJ, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS, Kim CK, Chai JK, Jung UW (2008) Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of computerized tomography. J Periodontol 79(3):406–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Ravida A, Oh TJ, Wang HL (2019) What Is the safety zone for palatal soft tissue graft harvesting based on the locations of the greater palatine artery and foramen? a Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77(2):271–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tucunduva MJ, Tucunduva-Neto R, Saieg M, Costa AL, de Freitas C (2016) Vascular mapping of the face: B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 21(2):e135-141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu SK, Lee MH, Park BS, Jeon YH, Chung YY, Kim HJ (2014) Topographical relationship of the greater palatine artery and the palatal spine. Significance for periodontal surgery. J Clin Periodontol 41(9):908–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KDK and WP conceived the ideas and research design of the study; KL and JC contributed on data acquisition; KP and JK analyzed and interpreted the data; KL and WP wrote initial draft; KL, WP, KP, JC, JK, and KK critically reviewed and revised the manuscript; all the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kee-Deog Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare. We have no specific funding source. We got institutional review board (IRB) from Dental Hospital, Yonsei University.

Data availability

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, KH., Park, W., Cheong, J. et al. Identifying the course of the greater palatine artery using intraoral ultrasonography: cohort study. Surg Radiol Anat 44, 1139–1146 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02967-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02967-y

Keywords

Navigation