Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Growth in fetuses of the constrictor pharyngis superior with special reference to its meeting with the buccinator: an embryological basis of adult variations in palatopharyngeal anatomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The constrictor pharyngis superior (CPS) initially develops along the posterior wall of the pharyngeal mucosal tube, whereas, during the early phase, the buccinators (BC) are far anterolateral to the CPS. The process and timing of their meeting during fetal growth have not been determined.

Methods

The topographical relationship between the growing BC and CPS was assessed in histological sections from 22 early- and mid-term fetuses of approximate gestational age (GA) 8–16 weeks, and eight late-term fetuses of approximate GA 31–39 weeks.

Results

At 8–9 weeks, the palatopharyngeus appeared to pull the CPS up and forward. Until 11 weeks, the CPS was attached to the hamulus of the pterygoid (pterygopharyngeal part). Until 13 weeks, the CPS extended anterolaterally beyond the hamulus to meet the BC. Some BC muscle fibers originated from the oral mucosa. Notably, by 30 weeks, the CPS-BC interface had become covered by or attached to the palatopharyngeus. Muscle fibers of the palatopharyngeus, however, were thinner than those of the CPS and BC. At and near the interface, BC muscle fibers tended to run along the left–right axis, whereas those of the CPS ran anteroposteriorly. A definite fascia (i.e., a future pterygomandibular raphe) was usually absent between these muscles in fetuses.

Conclusions

The excess anterior growth of the CPS with its subsequent degeneration might cause individual anatomical variations in composite muscle bundles of the palatopharyngeus-CPS complex or palatopharyngeal sphincter. A tensile transduction from the BC to the CPS through the raphe seemed unnecessary for cooperative suckling and swallowing after birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe S, Fukuda M, Yamane S et al (2013) Fetal anatomy of the upper pharyngeal muscles with special reference to the nerve supply: is it an enteric plexus or simply an intramuscular nerve? Anat Cell Biol 46:141–148. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2013.46.2.141

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cho KH, Lee HS, Katori Y et al (2013) Deep fat of the face revisited. Clin Anat 26:347–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding P, Campbell-Malone R, Holman SD et al (2013) Unilateral superior laryngeal nerve lesion in an animal model of dysphagia and its effect on sucking and swallowing. Dysphagia 28:404–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9448-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Doménech-Ratto G (1977) Development and peripheral innervation of the palatal muscles. Acta Anat 97:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1159/000144712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Doyle WJ, Kitajiri M, Sando I (1973) The anatomy of the auditory tube and paratubal musculature in a one month old cleft palate infact. Cleft Palate J 20:218–226

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hayashi S, Hirouchi H, Murakami G et al (2020) Transient connection or origin of the inferior pharyngeal constrictor during fetal development: a study using human fetal sagittal sections. Ann Anat 228:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.151438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holman SD, Waranch DR, Campbell-Malone R et al (2013) Sucking and swallowing rates after palatal anesthesia: an electromyographic study in infants pigs. J Neurophysiol 110:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00064.2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang NHS, Lee ST, Rajendram K (1998) Anatomic basis of cleftbpalate and velopharyngeal surgery: implications from a fresh cadaveric study. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:613–627. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199803000-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JH, Yamamoto M, Abe H et al (2017) The palatomaxillary suture revisited: a histological and immunohistochemical study using human fetuses. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 94:65–74. https://doi.org/10.2535/ofaj.94.65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim JH, Hayashi S, Yamamoto M et al (2020) Examination of the annular tendon (annulus of zinn) as a common origin of the extraocular rectus muscles: 2. Embryological basis of extraocular muscles anomalies. Investing Ophthal Vis Sci 61:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.12.5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klueber K, Langdon HL (1979) Anatomy of musclus levator veli palatini in the 15-week human fetuses. Acta Anat 105:94–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000145113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kriens OB (1969) An anatomical approach to veloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 43:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196901000-00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyake N, Hayashi S, Kawase T et al (2010) Fetal anatomy of the human carotid sheath and structures in and around it. Anat Rec 293:438–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Naito T, Cho KH, Yamamoto M et al (2019) Examination of the topographical anatomy and fetal development of the tendinous annulus of Zinn for a common origin of the extraocular recti. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 60:4564–4573. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-28094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodríguez-Vázquez JF, Kim JH, Verdugo-López S et al (2011) Human fetal hyoid body origin revisited. J Anat 219:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01387.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rood SR (1973) The morphology of musculus tensor veli palatini in the five-month human fetus. Am J Anat 138:191–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001380205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakamoto Y (2015) Spatial relationship between the palatopharyngeus and the superior constrictor of the pharynx. Surg Radiol Anat 37:649–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1444-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimada K (1979) A study of the morphology of the raphe pterygomandibularis, part 1. The adults. Nihon Univ Dent J 53:998–1007 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shimada K, Gasser RF (1989) Morphology of the pterygomandibular raphe in human fetuses and adults. Anat Rec 224:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092240115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sumida K, Yamashita K, Kitamura S (2012) Gross anatomical study of the human palatopharyngeus muscle throughout its entire course from origin to insertion. Clin Anat 25:314–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sumida K, Ando Y, Seki S et al (2017) Anatomical status of the human palatopharyngeal sphincter and its functional implications. Surg Radiol Anat 39:1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1855-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Swarts JD, Rood SR, Doyle WJ (1986) Fetal development of the auditory tube and paratubal musculature. Cleft Palate J 23:289–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsumori N, Abe S, Agematsu H et al (2007) Morphologic characteristics of the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle in relation to the function during swallowing. Dysphagia 22:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-006-9063-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamamoto M, Hashimoto K, Honkura Y et al (2020) Morphology of the upper esophageal sphincter or cricopharyngeus muscle revisited: a study using adult and fetal specimens. Clin Anat 33:782–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto M, Jin ZW, Hayashi H et al (2021) Association between the developing sphenoid and adult morphology: a study using sagittal sections of the skull base from human embryos and fetuses. J Anat 239:1300–1317. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Whillis J (1930) A note on the muscles of the palate and the superior constrictor. J Anat 65:92–95

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Williams PL (1995) Gray’s anatomy. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 1729–1733 (p 796)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu province (SZCY-001) and Wuxi Municipal Bureau on Science and Technology (N20202008) in China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZWJ: project development, data analysis, manuscript writing. JHK: data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing. MY: data collection, data management. YK: data analysis. HA: data analysis, manuscript editing. GM: project development, manuscript writing. SA: manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Hyun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial conflict of interest to be declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, ZW., Kim, J.H., Yamamoto, M. et al. Growth in fetuses of the constrictor pharyngis superior with special reference to its meeting with the buccinator: an embryological basis of adult variations in palatopharyngeal anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat 44, 559–571 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02907-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02907-w

Keywords

Navigation