Abstract
Background
Anatomical variations are common in gluteal region. This report presents two cases of gluteoperinealis muscles detected during radiological imaging.
Case presentation
Our study was conducted on two patients. This report describes an accessory muscle detected in the gluteal region on MRI examination of a patient who admitted to our clinic after a firearm injury and a second patient examined with CT imaging who had signs of pelvic infection.
In the first case, this accessory muscle originated bilaterally from the fascia of the gluteus maximus throughout its posteromedial side and was attached to the perineal body. In the second case, it extended forward from the fascia of the gluteus maximus muscle and inserted to the cavernous body of penis on the left side and to the perineal body on the right. In the literature, this accessory muscle has been described as the gluteoperinealis muscle being a rare variation.
Conclusion
Considering the origin and insertion of the muscle, this variation may be important during the surgical operations of the gluteal and perineal regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC (2000) An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J 11(4):230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70009-2
Gomez RG, Scarberry K (2018) Anatomy and techniques in posterior urethroplasty. Transl Androl Urol 7(4):567–579. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.03.05
Gruber W (1878) Ueber den Gesäss-Mittelfleischmuskel (Musculus gluteo-perinealis). Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin 74(4):456–460
Knott JF (1883) Muscular anomalies, including those of the diaphragm, and subdiaphragmatic regions of the human body. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. Science 3:627–641. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20490129
Macalister A (1869) On Muscular Anomalies in Human Anatomy and Their Bearing upon Homotypical Myology. Proc R Irish Acad [Internet]. 10:121–64. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20488978
Nicholson H, Woodley S, Flack N (2016) Gluteal muscles and lateral rotators of the hip. In: Tubbs RS, Shoja MM, Loukas M (eds.) Bergman’s comprehensive encyclopedia of human anatomic variation, Wiley. P. 386–840. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430309.ch39
Orthaber S, Pritsch A, Laura Zach AJ, Feigl GC (2020) Gluteus medius accessorius and gluteus quartus scansorius in one specimen: case report of two rare variations. Eur J Anat 24(2):161–163
Polesello GC, Queiroz MC, Linhares JPT, Amaral DT, Ono NK (2013) Case report: Anatomical variation of piriformis muscle as a cause of deep gluteal pain: Diagnosis using MR neurography and treatment. Rev Bras Ortop 48(1):114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2012.09.001
Soga H, Takenaka A, Murakami G, Fujisawa M (2008) Topographical relationship between urethral rhabdosphincter and rectourethralis muscle: A better understanding of the apical dissection and the posterior stitches in radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 15(8):729–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02096.x
Woodman PJ, Graney DO (2002) Anatomy and physiology of the female perineal body with relevance to obstetrical injury and repair. Clin Anat 15(5):321–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.10034
Funding
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MC: data analysis. TO: data collection and data analysis. BUS: protocol/project development. SS: manuscript writing/editing. GBS: manuscript writing/editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes from the Istanbul Medipol University Hospital. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Ethical Standards of the Institutional and National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All authors have consent to participate and publication.
Consent for publication
The participants have consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sen, S., Senol, G.B., Ormeci, T. et al. Gluteoperinealis muscle: a surgically important variation. Surg Radiol Anat 43, 1467–1470 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02766-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02766-x