Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anatomical variations of the pyramidalis muscle: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Anatomic Variations
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To provide a comprehensive evidence-based assessment of the anatomical characteristics of the pyramidalis muscle (PM).

Materials and methods

A thorough systematic search of the literature through August 31st 2020 was conducted on major electronic databases PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) to identify studies eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis using MetaFor package in R and MetaXL. A random-effects model was applied. The primary outcome of interest was the prevalence of PM. The secondary outcomes were the dimensions (length and width) of the PM.

Results

A total of 11 studies (n = 787 patients; 1548 sides) were included in the meta-analysis. The multinomial pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) for a bilateral absence of the PM was 11.3% (95% CI [7.2%, 16.2%], 82.3% (95% CI [76.2%, 87.6%]) for a bilateral presence, and 6.3% (95% CI [3.3%, 10.2%]) for a unilateral presence. Of four studies (n = 37 patients) that reported the side of a unilateral presence, the PPE of a unilateral right-side presence was 42.2% (95% CI [23.0%, 62.3%]) compared to 57.8% for a unilateral left-side presence (95% CI [37.7%, 77.0%]). The mean length of the PM displayed high levels of heterogeneity, ranging from 3.12 to 12.50 cm.

Conclusion

The pyramidalis muscle is a rather constant anatomical structure being present in approximately 90% of individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. QM refers to a statistic measuring the omnibus statistical significance of the moderators.

References

  1. Ashley-Montagu MF (1939) Anthropological significance of the musculus pyramidalis and its variability in man. Am J Phys Anthopol 15:435–490

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beaton LE, Anson BJ (1939) The pyramidalis muscle: its occurrence and size in American whites and Negroes. Am J Phys Anthropol 25:261

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brandon CJ, Jacobson JA, Fessell D, Dong Q, Morag Y, Girish G et al (2011) Groin pain beyond the hip: how anatomy predisposes to injury as visualized by musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1190–1197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cavalli M, Bombini G, Campanelli G (2014) Pubic inguinal pain syndrome: the so-called sports hernia. Surg Technol Int 24:189–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chouke KS (1935) The constitution of the sheath of the rectus abdominis muscle. Anat Rec 61:341–349

    Google Scholar 

  6. Costa SMRM, Souza SC, Rosa FP (2017) Músculo piramidal: estudo de 341 casos. Revista de Ciências Médicas e Biológicas 16(3):393–395

    Google Scholar 

  7. Czeckanowski J (1906) Zur frage der Correlationen der Muskelvarietaten. Boas Anniv 45:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  8. Das SS, Saluja S, Vasudeva N (2017) Biometrics of pyramidalis muscle and its clinical importance. J Clin Diagn Res 11(2):AC05–AC07

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dickson MJ (1999) The pyramidalis muscle. J Obstet Gynaecol 19(3):300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Didia B, Loveday O, Christian I (2009) Variation and incidence of agenesis of the pyramidalis muscles in Nigerian males. J Exp Clin Anat. https://doi.org/10.4314/jeca.v8i1.48031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dwight T (1893) Observations on the psoas parvus and pyramidalis. A study on variation. Proc Am Philos Soc 31:117–123

    Google Scholar 

  12. Falvey EC, Franklyn-Miller A, McCrory PR (2009) The groin triangle: a patho-anatomical approach to the diagnosis of chronic groin pain in athletes. Br J Sports Med 43(3):213–220

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Falvey EC, King E, Kinsella S, Franklyn-Miller A (2016) Athletic groin pain (part 1): a prospective anatomical diagnosis of 382 patients-clinical findings, MRI findings and patient-reported outcome measures at baseline. Br J Sports Med 50:423–430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frangenheim P (1914) Su operativender inkontinenz mannlichenharnohre. Verh Deutsch Gesellsch F Chir 43:149

    Google Scholar 

  15. Franklyn-Miller AD, Falvey E, McCrory P, Briggs C (2019) Landmarks for the 3G approach: groin, gluteal and greater trochanter triangles-A patho-anatomical method in sports medicine. Eur J Anat 12(2):81–87

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gilroy AM, MacPherson BR, Ross LM, Broman J, Josephson A (2016) Atlas of anatomy, 3rd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 148–149

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goebell R (1910) Zur operativen beseitigung der angebornen incontinentia vesicae. Ztschr Gynak 2:187

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gray H, Standring S (2008) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 41st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1072–1077

    Google Scholar 

  19. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Chapter 9, pp 277–278

  20. Hojaij FC, Kogima RO, Moyses RA, Akamatsu FE, Jacomo AL (2020) Morphometry and frequency of the pyramidalis muscle in adult humans: a pyramidalis muscle’s anatomical analysis. Clinics 75:e1623

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jit I, Banga N (1986) Incidence of pyramidalis muscle in north Indian subjects. J Anat Soc India 35(1):21–27

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaur H, Singla RK, Brar RS, Singla M (2016) Study of the morphometry of the pyramidalis muscle and its incidence in the Indian population. Int J Anat Res 4(2):2207–2211

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koganei Y, Arai H, Shikinami J (1903) Varietatenstatistik der musculn. Tokyo IgakkaiZasshi 17:127–139

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kogima RO, Simões P, de Paula Santos LM, Hojaij F, Andrade M, Akamatsu FE, Al J (2018) Morphometry and frequency of the pyramidalis muscle in adult humans. FASEB J 32(Supplement 1):513–518

    Google Scholar 

  25. LeDouble AF (1897) Traite' des variations du systeme musculaire de l’homme et leur signification au point de vue de l’anthropologie zoologique. Libraire C. Reinwald, Scheicher Freres, Paris, pp 583–587

  26. Light RJ, Pillemer DB (1986) Summing up: the science of reviewing research Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, xiii+ 191 pp. Educ Res 15(8):16–17

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meyers WC, Foley DP, Garrett WE et al (2000) Management of severe lower abdominal or inguinal pain in high-performance athletes. PAIN (Performing Athletes with Abdominal or Inguinal Neuromuscular Pain Study Group). Am J Sports 28:2–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mingin GC, Youngren K, Stock JA, Hanna MK (2002) The rectus myofascial wrap in the management of urethral sphincter incompetence. BJU Int 90(6):550–553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morelli V, Weaver V (2005) Groin injuries and groin pain in athletes: part 1. Prim Care Clin Off Pract 32:163–183

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nakamura S (1935) Ueber den M. rectus abdominis und den M. pyramidalis der Japaner (am Kynahu). J Kumamoto Med Soc 11:1251–1261

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nakano T (1923) Beiträge zur Anatomie der Chinesen. Die Statistik der Muskelvarie t iten. Folia Anatomica Japonica 1(5):273–282

    Google Scholar 

  33. Natsis K, Piagkou M, Repousi E, Apostolidis S, Kotsiomitis E, Apostolou K, Skandalakis P (2016) Morphometric variability of pyramidalis muscle and its clinical significance. Surg Radiol Anat 38(3):285–292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Raghavan R, Arya P, Arya P, China S (2014) Abdominal incisions and sutures in obstetrics and gynaecology. Obstet Gynaecol 16(1):13–18

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rajawasam PP, Prabodha LBL, Gamage U, Nanayakkara BG, Ilayperuma I (2011) Incidence of pyramidalis muscle. In: Proceedings of the annual research symposium, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Kelaniya, pp 133

  36. Schilders E, Bharam S, Golan E, Dimitrakopoulou A, Mitchell A, Spaepen M, Beggs C, Cooke C, Holmich P (2017) The pyramidalis–anterior pubic ligament–adductor longus complex (PLAC) and its role with adductor injuries: a new anatomical concept. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(12):3969–3977

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Schwalbe G, Pffitzner W (1889) Variet statistik und anthropologie. Anat Anz 4:705–714

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sheen AJ, Stephenson BM, Lloyd DM et al (2014) Treatment of the sportsman’s groin: British Hernia Society’s 2014 position statement based on the Manchester Consensus Conference. Br J Sports Med 48:1079–1087

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sinha DN, Kumar V (1985) Study of human pyramidalis muscle in Indian subjects. Anthropol Anz 43(2):173–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stoeckel W (1917) Uber die verwendung der Musculi Pyramidalis bei der operativen behandlung der incontinentia urinae. Zentrabl Gynakol 41:11

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sumino Y, Hirata Y, Hanada M, Akita Y, Sato F, Mimata H (2011) Long-term cryopreservation of pyramidalis muscle specimens as a source of striated muscle stem cells for treatment of post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Prostate 71(11):1225–1230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Taylor DC, Meyers WC, Moylan JA et al (1991) Abdominal musculature abnormalities as a cause of groin pain in athletes. Inguinal hernias and pubalgia. Am J Sports Med 19(3):239–242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J, Olkin I (2003) Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Stats Med 22:2113–2126

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thomson A (1895) Fifth annual report of the committee of collective investigation of the anatomical society of Great Britain and Ireland for the year 1893–94. J Anat Physiol 35–60

  45. Vallois HV (1926) Valeur et signification du muscle pyramidal de l’abdomen. Arch Anat Histol Embryol 5:497–525

    Google Scholar 

  46. Van Landuyt KO, Hamdi MO, Blondeel P, Monstrey S (2003) The pyramidalis muscle free flap. Br J Plast Surg 56(6):585–592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Weir A, Brukner P, Delahunt E et al (2015) Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes. Br J Sports Med 49:768–774

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Zoga AC, Mullens FE, Meyers WC (2010) The spectrum of MR imaging in athletic pubalgia. Radiol Clin N Am 48(6):1179–1197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None was sought for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Protocol/project development: RC. Data collection or management: RC, IC. Data analysis: RC, IC, JR. Manuscript writing/editing: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac Cheruiyot.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cirocchi, R., Cheruiyot, I., Henry, B.M. et al. Anatomical variations of the pyramidalis muscle: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Radiol Anat 43, 595–605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02622-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02622-4

Keywords

Navigation