Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to determine Euclidean distances between landmark structures in the larynx and pharynx to optimize endoscope shaft designs with regard to gentle and patient-oriented handling.
Methods
Four Euclidean distances between landmarks in the larynx and pharynx were analyzed based on CT data of 66 patients. Distance (1): labium inferius oris—posterior pharyngeal wall at the cervical vertebra C1 (atlas), anterior edge of the tuberculum anterius atlantis. Distance (2): posterior pharyngeal wall adjacent to C1—entrance of pyriform sinus. Distance (3): inferior edge of the uvula—superior edge of the epiglottis. Distance (4): base of the vallecula—posterior pharyngeal wall. The minimum angular field of view α required to observe the glottis with a rigid transoral laryngoscope was derived trigonometrically from distances (2) and (4).
Results
Average Euclidean distances measured: Distance (1): 90.7 mm ± 6.9 mm in men and 86.9 mm ± 5.9 mm in women. (2): 73.7 mm ± 13.4 mm and 56.2 mm ± 7.6 mm. (3): 25.2 mm ± 8.6 mm and 18.5 mm ± 6.8 mm. (4): 20.8 mm ± 4.6 mm and 16.5 mm ± 3.4 mm. α: 16.0° ± 3.9° and 16.6 ± 4.3°.
Conclusions
As expected, statistically significant sex-related differences could be observed for distances (1)–(4). The results indicate that the length of transoral laryngoscopes should not be below 110 mm and that a minimum angular field of view of α = 17° is required to fully observe the laryngeal inlet.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayoub N, Eble P, Kniha K, Peters F, Möhlhenrich SC, Goloborodko E, Hölzle F, Modabber A (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation of the posterior airway space: differences in computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 23(2):603–609
Cox E, Ghasemloonia A, Nakoneshny SC, Zareinia K, Hudon M, Lysack JT, Sutherland GR, Dort JC (2017) Improved transoral surgical tool design by CT measurements of the oral cavity and pharynx. J Robot Surg 11(2):179–185
Donner S, Bleeker S, Ripken T, Ptok M, Jungheim M, Krueger A (2015) Automated working distance adjustment enables optical coherence tomography of the human larynx in awake patients. J Med Imaging 2(2):026003
Eckel HE, Sittel C, Zorowka P, Jerke A (1994) Dimensions of the laryngeal framework in adults. Surg Radiol Anat 16(1):31–36
Fast JF, Muley A, Kühn D, Meisoll F, Ortmaier T, Jungheim M, Ptok M, Kahrs LA (2017) Towards microprocessor-based control of droplet parameters for endoscopic laryngeal adductor reflex triggering. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 3(2):239–243
Fast JF, Ptok M, Jungheim M, Szymanski R, Ortmaier T, Kahrs LA (2018) Towards fully automated determination of laryngeal adductor reflex latencies through high-speed laryngoscopy image processing. In: Maier A, Deserno T, Handels H, Maier-Hein K, Palm C, Tolxdorff T (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2018. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg
Friedrich G, Kainz J (1988) Morphometry of the larynx in horizontal sections. Normal data for the quantitative evaluation of current imaging technics. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 67(6):269–274 (article in German)
Guo S, Hutchison R, Jackson RP, Kohli A, Sharp T, Orwin E, Haskell R, Chen Z, Wong BJ (2006) Office-based optical coherence tomographic imaging of human vocal cords. J Biomed Opt 11(3):30501
Honda K, Tiede MK (1998) An MRI study on the relationship between oral cavity shape and larynx position. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on spoken language processing, vol 2, pp 437–440
Iida-Kondo C, Yoshino N, Kurabayashi T, Mataki S, Hasegawa M M, Kurosaki N (2006) Comparison of tongue volume/oral cavity volume ratio between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients and normal adults using magnetic resonance imaging. J Med Dent Sci 53(2):119–126
Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Okada S, Kagaya H, Shibata S, Baba M, Onogi K, Hashimoto S, Katada K, Wattanapan P, Palmer JB (2015) Anatomy of the larynx and pharynx: effects of age, gender and height revealed by multidetector computed tomography. J Oral Rehabil 42(9):670–677
Ingram WS, Yang J, Wendt R 3rd, Beadle BM, Rao A, Wang XA, Court LE (2017) The influence of non-rigid anatomy and patient positioning on endoscopy-CT image registration in the head and neck. Med Phys 44(8):4159–4168
Jotz GP, Stefani MA, da Costa Pereira, Filho O, Malysz T, Soster PR, Leão HZ (2014) A morphometric study of the larynx. J Voice 28(6):668–672
Just T, Lankenau E, Prall F, Hüttmann G, Pau HW, Sommer K (2010) Optical coherence tomography allows for the reliable identification of laryngeal epithelial dysplasia and for precise biopsy: a clinicopathological study of 61 patients undergoing microlaryngoscopy. Laryngoscope 120(10):1964–1970
Ptok M, Schroeter S (2016) Deliberate release of the laryngeal adductor reflex via microdroplet impulses: development of a device. HNO 64(3):149–155 (article in German)
Schade G, Hess M, Rassow B (2002) Possibility for endolaryngeal morphometric measurements with a new laser light method. HNO 50(8):753–755 (article in German)
Schade G, Rassow B, Kirchhoff T, Kraas M, Hess M (2005) Endolaryngeal distance measurement by laser light projection—from the idea to clinical application. Laryngo Rhino Otol 84(4):246–252 (article in German)
Wysocki J, Kielska E, Orszulak P, Reymond J (2008) Measurements of pre- and postpubertal human larynx: a cadaver study. Surg Radiol Anat 30(3):191–199
Zabic M, Sharifpourboushehri S, Müller-Wirts L, Benecke H, Heisterkamp A, Meyer H, Ripken T (2019) Concept for high speed vocal cord imaging with swept-source optical coherence tomography. In: Proc. SPIE 10853, optical imaging, therapeutics, and advanced technology in head and neck surgery and otolaryngology 2019, 108530H
Funding
This work was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grants PT 2/5-1 and KA 2975/6-1 as well as the European Regional Development Fund (project OPhonLas).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DD: acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, statistics, drafting of the manuscript. JFF: analysis and interpretation of data, revision of the manuscript. FG: supply of CT data. LAK: project coordination, proofreading, edits of the manuscript. SM: drafting and revision of manuscript. MJ: study concept and design, supervision of acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, statistics, drafting of the manuscript. MP: study design, supervision of the study, interpretation of data, revision of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products or devices mentioned in this manuscript.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diers, D., Fast, J.F., Götz, F. et al. Euclidean distances of laryngopharyngeal structures obtained from CT data for preclinical development of laryngoscopic devices. Surg Radiol Anat 42, 695–700 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02397-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02397-3