Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Euclidean distances of laryngopharyngeal structures obtained from CT data for preclinical development of laryngoscopic devices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to determine Euclidean distances between landmark structures in the larynx and pharynx to optimize endoscope shaft designs with regard to gentle and patient-oriented handling.

Methods

Four Euclidean distances between landmarks in the larynx and pharynx were analyzed based on CT data of 66 patients. Distance (1): labium inferius oris—posterior pharyngeal wall at the cervical vertebra C1 (atlas), anterior edge of the tuberculum anterius atlantis. Distance (2): posterior pharyngeal wall adjacent to C1—entrance of pyriform sinus. Distance (3): inferior edge of the uvula—superior edge of the epiglottis. Distance (4): base of the vallecula—posterior pharyngeal wall. The minimum angular field of view α required to observe the glottis with a rigid transoral laryngoscope was derived trigonometrically from distances (2) and (4).

Results

Average Euclidean distances measured: Distance (1): 90.7 mm ± 6.9 mm in men and 86.9 mm ± 5.9 mm in women. (2): 73.7 mm ± 13.4 mm and 56.2 mm ± 7.6 mm. (3): 25.2 mm ± 8.6 mm and 18.5 mm ± 6.8 mm. (4): 20.8 mm ± 4.6 mm and 16.5 mm ± 3.4 mm. α: 16.0° ± 3.9° and 16.6 ± 4.3°.

Conclusions

As expected, statistically significant sex-related differences could be observed for distances (1)–(4). The results indicate that the length of transoral laryngoscopes should not be below 110 mm and that a minimum angular field of view of α = 17° is required to fully observe the laryngeal inlet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayoub N, Eble P, Kniha K, Peters F, Möhlhenrich SC, Goloborodko E, Hölzle F, Modabber A (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation of the posterior airway space: differences in computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 23(2):603–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cox E, Ghasemloonia A, Nakoneshny SC, Zareinia K, Hudon M, Lysack JT, Sutherland GR, Dort JC (2017) Improved transoral surgical tool design by CT measurements of the oral cavity and pharynx. J Robot Surg 11(2):179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Donner S, Bleeker S, Ripken T, Ptok M, Jungheim M, Krueger A (2015) Automated working distance adjustment enables optical coherence tomography of the human larynx in awake patients. J Med Imaging 2(2):026003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eckel HE, Sittel C, Zorowka P, Jerke A (1994) Dimensions of the laryngeal framework in adults. Surg Radiol Anat 16(1):31–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fast JF, Muley A, Kühn D, Meisoll F, Ortmaier T, Jungheim M, Ptok M, Kahrs LA (2017) Towards microprocessor-based control of droplet parameters for endoscopic laryngeal adductor reflex triggering. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 3(2):239–243

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fast JF, Ptok M, Jungheim M, Szymanski R, Ortmaier T, Kahrs LA (2018) Towards fully automated determination of laryngeal adductor reflex latencies through high-speed laryngoscopy image processing. In: Maier A, Deserno T, Handels H, Maier-Hein K, Palm C, Tolxdorff T (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2018. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  7. Friedrich G, Kainz J (1988) Morphometry of the larynx in horizontal sections. Normal data for the quantitative evaluation of current imaging technics. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 67(6):269–274 (article in German)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo S, Hutchison R, Jackson RP, Kohli A, Sharp T, Orwin E, Haskell R, Chen Z, Wong BJ (2006) Office-based optical coherence tomographic imaging of human vocal cords. J Biomed Opt 11(3):30501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Honda K, Tiede MK (1998) An MRI study on the relationship between oral cavity shape and larynx position. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on spoken language processing, vol 2, pp 437–440

  10. Iida-Kondo C, Yoshino N, Kurabayashi T, Mataki S, Hasegawa M M, Kurosaki N (2006) Comparison of tongue volume/oral cavity volume ratio between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients and normal adults using magnetic resonance imaging. J Med Dent Sci 53(2):119–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Okada S, Kagaya H, Shibata S, Baba M, Onogi K, Hashimoto S, Katada K, Wattanapan P, Palmer JB (2015) Anatomy of the larynx and pharynx: effects of age, gender and height revealed by multidetector computed tomography. J Oral Rehabil 42(9):670–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ingram WS, Yang J, Wendt R 3rd, Beadle BM, Rao A, Wang XA, Court LE (2017) The influence of non-rigid anatomy and patient positioning on endoscopy-CT image registration in the head and neck. Med Phys 44(8):4159–4168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jotz GP, Stefani MA, da Costa Pereira, Filho O, Malysz T, Soster PR, Leão HZ (2014) A morphometric study of the larynx. J Voice 28(6):668–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Just T, Lankenau E, Prall F, Hüttmann G, Pau HW, Sommer K (2010) Optical coherence tomography allows for the reliable identification of laryngeal epithelial dysplasia and for precise biopsy: a clinicopathological study of 61 patients undergoing microlaryngoscopy. Laryngoscope 120(10):1964–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ptok M, Schroeter S (2016) Deliberate release of the laryngeal adductor reflex via microdroplet impulses: development of a device. HNO 64(3):149–155 (article in German)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schade G, Hess M, Rassow B (2002) Possibility for endolaryngeal morphometric measurements with a new laser light method. HNO 50(8):753–755 (article in German)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schade G, Rassow B, Kirchhoff T, Kraas M, Hess M (2005) Endolaryngeal distance measurement by laser light projection—from the idea to clinical application. Laryngo Rhino Otol 84(4):246–252 (article in German)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wysocki J, Kielska E, Orszulak P, Reymond J (2008) Measurements of pre- and postpubertal human larynx: a cadaver study. Surg Radiol Anat 30(3):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zabic M, Sharifpourboushehri S, Müller-Wirts L, Benecke H, Heisterkamp A, Meyer H, Ripken T (2019) Concept for high speed vocal cord imaging with swept-source optical coherence tomography. In: Proc. SPIE 10853, optical imaging, therapeutics, and advanced technology in head and neck surgery and otolaryngology 2019, 108530H

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grants PT 2/5-1 and KA 2975/6-1 as well as the European Regional Development Fund (project OPhonLas).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DD: acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, statistics, drafting of the manuscript. JFF: analysis and interpretation of data, revision of the manuscript. FG: supply of CT data. LAK: project coordination, proofreading, edits of the manuscript. SM: drafting and revision of manuscript. MJ: study concept and design, supervision of acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, statistics, drafting of the manuscript. MP: study design, supervision of the study, interpretation of data, revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Miller.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products or devices mentioned in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diers, D., Fast, J.F., Götz, F. et al. Euclidean distances of laryngopharyngeal structures obtained from CT data for preclinical development of laryngoscopic devices. Surg Radiol Anat 42, 695–700 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02397-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02397-3

Keywords

Navigation