Skip to main content
Log in

Ulnar trochlear notch articular surface has three morphological patterns: a neglected major anatomical feature

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The typical anatomical illustration of the trochlear notch articular surface includes a transverse rough non-articular ridge which separates the olecranon and coronoid part of the joint. This transverse ridge, the “bare area”, is not covered by cartilage and represents the optimal entry point for olecranon osteotomies. Aim of the present study was to encounter the anatomical variations in the morphology of the trochlear notch articular surface.

Methods

Two-hundred seventy-three dried ulnae were inspected and a qualitative classification of the variations of the trochlear notch articular surface was done. Correlation to gender and side was examined.

Results

Three distinct morphological patterns were observed. Separate olecranon and coronoid facets (Type I) were the most common pattern (165/273, 60.4%). Partial fusion of olecranon and coronoid facets (Type II) was observed in 75 out of 273 bones (27.5%), while a single olecranon and coronoid facet (Type III) was present in 33 out of 273 bones (12.1%). The occurrence of Type II and III was significantly more common in females (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The most common morphological pattern of the proximal ulna articular surface was the olecranon and coronoid facets separated by the transverse ridge, which is considered as the typical anatomical pattern. The partial fusion of olecranon and coronoid facets was the second most common pattern (27.5%) and the single olecranon and coronoid facet with no transverse ridge present was the rarest one (12.1%). These variations affect the area covered by cartilage. They are noticeable in an elbow MRI and they may have implications on olecranon osteotomy. Absence of the transverse ridge may confuse the surgeon during elbow arthroscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barel PD, Hanel PD (2011) Fractures of the distal humerus. In: Green DP, Wolfe SW (eds) Green’s operative hand surgery. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 745–782

    Google Scholar 

  2. Canale ST, Beaty JH (2013) Fractures and dislocations in children. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, Campbell WC (eds) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Elsevier/Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 1365–1522

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keats TE, Anderson MW (2006) The forearm. In: Keats TE, Anderson MW (eds) Atlas of normal roentgen variants that may simulate disease. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 546–576

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kieffer EM, Bouchaib J, Bierry G, Clavert P (2014) CT arthrography and anatomical correlation of the bare area of the ulnar trochlear fossa: a risk of misdiagnosis of cartilage ulcerations. Surg Radiol Anat 36:481–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1200-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Milz S, Eckstein F, Putz R (1997) Thickness distribution of the subchondral mineralization zone of the trochlear notch and its correlation with the cartilage thickness: an expression of functional adaptation to mechanical stress acting on the humeroulnar joint? Anat Rec 248:189–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oberländer W, Breul R, Kurrat HJ (1984) Transverse groove of the elbow joint. A biomechanical interpretation of its origin. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 122:682–685. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1045051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perez EA (2013) Fractures of the shoulder, arm, and forearm. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, Campbell WC (eds) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Elsevier/Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 2829–2916

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ring D, Jupiter JB (2011) Fractures of proximal ulna. In: Green DP, Wolfe SW (eds) Green’s operative hand surgery. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 821–836

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Cheung Y, Broker M (1995) MR imaging of the elbow: normal variant and potential diagnostic pitfalls of the trochlear groove and cubital tunnel. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:415–418. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Standring S, Gray H (2008) Elbow. In: Standring S, Gray H (eds) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, Edinburgh, pp 1507–1522

    Google Scholar 

  11. Standring S, Gray H (2008) Forearm. In: Standring S, Gray H (eds) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, Edinburgh, pp 1523–1556

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tillmann B (1978) A contribution to the functional morphology of articular surfaces. Norm Pathol Anat (Stuttg) 4:1–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang AA, Mara M, Hutchinson DT (2003) The proximal ulna: an anatomic study with relevance to olecranon osteotomy and fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elb Surg 12:293–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/mse.2003.S1058274602868033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trifon Totlis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Totlis, T., Otountzidis, N., Papadopoulos, S. et al. Ulnar trochlear notch articular surface has three morphological patterns: a neglected major anatomical feature. Surg Radiol Anat 41, 1333–1336 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02310-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02310-y

Keywords

Navigation