Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Morphometric development of the tongue in fetal cadavers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The tongue is a specific organ for the sense of taste. It consists of the striated muscle and mucous membrane. Furthermore, it helps the functions of speech, chewing, and swallowing. In this study, we aimed to reveal some morphometric properties of the tongue in fetal cadavers.

Methods

The study was conducted on a total of 45 fetal tongues (25 male tongues, 20 female tongues) aged between 17 and 40 weeks. The fetuses were divided into three groups as trimester II, trimester III, and full term. For each tongue, the length, width, area, free tongue length, and the terminal sulcus angle were measured using Image J program. The free tongue length/tongue length ratio was examined.

Results

The obtained data were compared according to the trimester groups and genders. It was determined that the tongue length, width, area, and free tongue length increased during the trimesters and that there was no significant difference in the terminal sulcus angle and the free tongue length/tongue length ratio between the trimesters. No significant difference was found in all parameters between the genders.

Conclusions

This study presented significant data on morphometric development of the tongue. These data are thought to be useful for determining the anomaly and variations of the tongue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achiron R, Ben Arie A, Gabbay U, Mashiach S, Rotstein Z, Lipitz S (1997) Development of the fetal tongue between 14 and 26 weeks of gestation: in utero ultrasonographic measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:39–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aguiar LS, Juliano GR, Silveira LAM, Oliveira MS, Torquato BGS, Juliano GR, Araujo MF, Pereira SAL, Teixeira VPA, Ferraz MLF (2018) Tongue development in stillborns autopsied at different gestational ages. J Pediatr (Rio J) 94:616–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boonstra H, Oosterhuis JW, Oosterhuis AM, Fleuren GJ (1983) Cervical tissue shrinkage by formaldehyde fixation, paraffin wax embedding, section cutting and mounting. Virchows Archiv A 402:195–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd D, Ouick A, Murray C (2004) The Down syndrome patient in dental practice, part ll: clinical. N Z Dent J 100:4–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bronshtein M, Zimmer EZ, Tzidony D, Hajos J, Jaeger M, Blazer S (1998) Transvaginal sonographic measurement of fetal lingual width in early pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 18:577–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox CH, Jhonson FB, Whiting J, Roller PP (1985) Formaldehyde fixation. J Histochem Cytochem 33:845–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gunlemez A, Işken T (2008) Pierre Robin Sekansı: Yenidoğan döneminde hava yolu açıklığının ve beslenmenin sağlanması. Çocuk Dergisi 8:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta OP (1971) Congenital macroglossia. Arch Otolaryngol 93:378–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong SJ, Cha BG, Kim YS, Lee SK, Chi JG (2015) Tongue growth during prenatal development in Korean fetuses and embryos. J Pathol Transl Med 49:497–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horn C, Thaker HM, Tampakopoulou DA, Serres LMD, Keller JL, Haddad J Jr (2001) Tongue lesions in the pediatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:164–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hutchinson EF, Kieser JA, Kramer B (2014) Morphometric growth relationships of the immature human mandible and tongue. Eur J Oral Sci 122:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iskander A, Sanders I (2003) Morphological comparison between neonatal and adult human tongues. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 112:768–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kotlow LA (1999) Ankyloglossia (tongue-tie): a diagnostic and treatment quandary. Quintessence Int 30:259–262

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lam AM, Vavilala MS (2000) Macroglossia: compartment syndrome of the tongue? Anesthesiol J Am Soc Anesthesiol 92:1832

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lauder R, Muhl ZF (1991) Estimation of tongue volume from magnetic resonance imaging. Angle Orthod 61:175–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liegeois F, Albert A, Limme M (2010) Comparison between tongue volume from magnetic resonance images and tongue area from profile cephalograms. Eur J Orthod 32:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mangold AR, Torgerson RR, Rogers RS III (2016) Diseases of the tongue. Clin Dermatol 34:458–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moura CP, Cunha LM, Vilarinho H, Cunha MJ, Freitas D, Palha M, Pueschel SM, Pais-Clemente M (2008) Voice parameters in children with Down syndrome. J Voice 22:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Petersen MB, Hansen M, Djernes BW (1987) Full trisomy 22 in a newborn infant. Ann Genet 30:101–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reynoso MC, Hernandez A, Soto F, Garcia-Cruz O, Martinez Y, Martinez R, Cantu JM (1986) Autosomal dominant macroglossia in two unrelated families. Hum Genet 74:200–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rice JP, Stephen HC (1985) A case report of lingual lymphangioma presenting as recurrent massive tongue enlargement. Clin Pediatr 24:47–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Siebert JR (1985) A morphometric study of normal and abnormal fetal to childhood tongue size. Arch Oral Biol 30:433–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Standring S (2008) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Topouzelis N, Iliopoulos C, Kolokitha OE (2011) Macroglossia. Int Dent J 61:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tozak Yıldız H, Ozdamar S (2009) İnsan fetuslarında dil papillalarının gelişiminin taramalı elektron mikroskobunda incelenmesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 18:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Lierde KM, Mortier G, Huysman E, Vermeersch H (2010) Long-term impact of tongue reduction on speech intelligibility, articulation and oromyofunctional behaviour in a child with Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ylmaz M, Mercan H, Karaman E, Kaytaz A (2009) Tongue reduction in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome with CO2 laser. J Craniofac Surg 20:1202–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoo E, Murakami S, Takada K, Fuchihatal H, Sakuda M (1996) Tongue volume in human female adults with mandibular prognathism. J Dent Res 75:1957–1962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AD: project development, data acquisition, manuscript draft, and manuscript review. YK: data acquisition, manuscript draft, manuscript review. DK: data acquisition, manuscript review. NY: data analysis, manuscript editing. TE: data analysis, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Dursun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This is a retrospective study. Ethics committee approval is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dursun, A., Kastamonı, Y., Kacaroglu, D. et al. Morphometric development of the tongue in fetal cadavers. Surg Radiol Anat 42, 3–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02301-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-019-02301-z

Keywords

Navigation