Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 713–720 | Cite as

Micro-CT study of the human cochlear aqueduct

  • Zhenghua Li
  • Dazhi Shi
  • Heng Li
  • Songhua Tan
  • Yikang Liu
  • Chenglin Qi
  • Anzhou Tang
Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

The anatomic structure of the cochlear aqueduct (CA) in human temporal bone specimens was observed using micro-computed tomography (CT).

Materials and methods

Micro-CT scanning of 18-µm-thick slices was performed on 30 slides of human temporal bone specimens to observe the CA structure and its relationship with its surroundings. The length, internal and external apertures, and the narrowest width of the CA were measured. The differences in CAs were compared between high jugular bulb (HJB) specimens and normal specimens.

Results

A large number of CA images were acquired using Micro-CT scanning, which clearly displayed the basic anatomic structures, stereotactic localizations, and adjacent relationships of the CAs. The whole course of a CA was 12.31 ± 3.60 mm, the diameter of the internal aperture was 465 ± 242 µm, the diameter of the external aperture was 2.88 ± 1.06 mm, the narrowest diameter was 601 ± 335 µm, the diameter of the opening of inferior cochlear vein (ICV) was 151 ± 50 µm, the distance between the internal aperture and ICV was 270 ± 197 µm, and the distance between the inferior margin of the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and the top most part of the external aperture of the CA was 6.783 ± 2.15 mm. No bony obstruction of the CA or CA enlargement was observed in the specimens. A total of 28 CAs had one accompanying bony canal in the surroundings. The length and travelling of the CA were not affected by the level of the jugular bulb (JB). The variation of the travelling of the ICV was larger than that of the CA.

Conclusion

Micro-CT adequately displayed the bony CA canal and provided a new method for anatomical studies of the CA and a basis for functional studies.

Keywords

Micro-CT Cochlear aqueduct Inferior cochlear vein High-resolution CT 

Notes

Author contributions

AT: convinced and designed the experiments, ZL: preformed the experiments, DS: preformed the experiments, HL: analyzed the data, ST: analyzed the data, YL: analyzed the data, CQ: analyzed the data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Bachor E, Byahatti S, Karmody CS (1997) The cochlear aqueduct in pediatric temporal bones. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhimani S, Virapongse C, Sarwar M (1984) High-resolution computed tomographic appearance of normal cochlear aqueduct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 5:715–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braun K, Bohnke F, Stark T (2012) Three-dimensional representation of the human cochlea using micro-computed tomography data: presenting an anatomical model for further numerical calculations. Acta Oto-laryngol 132:603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlborg BI, Farmer JC Jr (1983) Transmission of cerebrospinal fluid pressure via the cochlear aqueduct and endolymphatic sac. Am J Otolaryngol 4:273–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Greef D, Buytaert JA, Aerts JR, Van Hoorebeke L, Dierick M, Dirckx J (2015) Details of human middle ear morphology based on micro-CT imaging of phosphotungstic acid stained samples. J Morphol 276:1025–1046CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farrior JB, Endicott JN (1971) Congenital mixed deafness: cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea. Ablation of the aqueduct of the cochlea. Laryngoscope 81:684–699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gopen Q, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN (1997) Anatomy of the normal human cochlear aqueduct with functional implications. Hear Res 107:9–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo R, Zhang H, Chen W, Zhu X, Liu W, Rask-Andersen H (2016) The inferior cochlear vein: surgical aspects in cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:355–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hemmingsson A, Lindgren PG (1974) The cochlear aqueduct. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 15:612–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackler RK, Hwang PH (1993) Enlargement of the cochlear aqueduct: fact or fiction? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 109:14–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelemen G, Denia La Fuente A, Perez Olivares F (1979) The cochlear aqueduct: structural considerations. Laryngoscope 89:639–645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kozerska M, Skrzat J, Spulber A, Walocha J, Wronski S, Tarasiuk J (2017) Micro-CT study of the dehiscences of the tympanic segment of the facial canal. Surg Radiol Anat 39:375–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Le Breton A, Jegoux F, Pilet P, Godey B (2015) Micro-CT scan, electron microscopy and optical microscopy study of insertional traumas of cochlear implants. Surg Radiol Anat 37:815–823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee JY, Shin KJ, Kim JN, Yoo JY, Song WC, Koh KS (2013) A morphometric study of the semicircular canals using micro-CT images in three-dimensional reconstruction. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 296:834–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Migirov L, Kronenberg J (2005) Radiology of the cochlear aqueduct. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:863–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohammadi A, Jufas N, Sale P, Lee K, Patel N, O’Leary S (2017) Micro-CT analysis of the anatomical characteristics of the stapedial annular ligament. Anat Sci Int 92:262–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mukherji SK, Baggett HC, Alley J, Carrasco VH (1998) Enlarged cochlear aqueduct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:330–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muren C, Vignaud J, Wilbrand H, Wilbrand S (1985) Patency of the cochlear aqueduct. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 26:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Muren C, Wilbrand H (1986) Anatomic variations of the human cochlear aqueduct. A radioanatomic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 27:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Palva T (1970) Cochlear aqueduct in infants. Acta Otolaryngol 70:83–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Palva T, Dammert K (1969) Human cochlear aqueduct. Acta Otolaryngol:Suppl 246:241+Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Park JJ, Shen A, Keil S, Kraemer N, Westhofen M (2014) Radiological findings of the cochlear aqueduct in patients with Meniere’s disease using high-resolution CT and high-resolution MRI. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:3325–3331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Phelps PD (1993) Dilation of the cochlear aqueduct–another otological myth? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 18:339–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rask-Andersen H, Stahle J, Wilbrand H (1977) Human cochlear aqueduct and its accessory canals. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 86:1–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ritter FN, Lawrence M (1965) A histological and experimental study of cochlear aqueduct patency in the adult human. Laryngoscope 75:1224–1233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sahni D, Singla A, Gupta A, Gupta T, Aggarwal A (2015) Relationship of cochlea with surrounding neurovascular structures and their implication in cochlear implantation. Surg Radiol Anat 37:913–919CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shin KJ, Gil YC, Lee JY, Kim JN, Song WC, Koh KS (2014) Three-dimensional study of the facial canal using microcomputed tomography for improved anatomical comprehension. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 297:1808–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singla A, Gupta T, Sahni D, Gupta AK, Aggarwal A (2017) Topography of neurovascular structures in relation to round window and how it relates to cochlear implantation. Surg Radiol Anat 39:1309–1316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Skadorwa T, Maslanka M, Ciszek B (2015) The morphology and morphometry of the fetal fallopian canal: a microtomographic study. Surg Radiol Anat 37:677–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Skrzat J, Kozerska M, Wronski S, Tarasiu J, Walocha J (2015) Volume rendering of the tympanic cavity from micro-CT data. Folia Med Cracov 55:81–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stimmer H (2011) Enlargement of the cochlear aqueduct: does it exist? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1655–1661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Strauss M, Aufiero T, Varano L (1983) Cochlear aqueduct radiographic anatomy in temporal bone preparations and in sudden hearing loss. Laryngoscope 93:1341–1344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tekdemir I, Aslan A, Ersoy M, Karahan ST, Tellioglu C (2000) A radiologico-anatomical comparative study of the cochlear aqueduct. Clin Radiol 55:288–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Toriya R, Arima T, Kuraoka A, Uemura T (1994) Fine structure of the human cochlear aqueduct: a light and transmission electron microscopic study of decalcified temporal bones. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 251(Suppl 1):S38-42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Visvanathan V, Morrissey MSC (2015) Anatomical variations of the temporal bone on high-resolution computed tomography imaging: how common are they? J Laryngol Otol 129:634–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wadin K, Thomander L, Wilbrand H (1986) Effects of a high jugular fossa and jugular bulb diverticulum on the inner ear. A clinical and radiologic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 27:629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhenghua Li
    • 1
  • Dazhi Shi
    • 2
  • Heng Li
    • 3
  • Songhua Tan
    • 3
  • Yikang Liu
    • 3
  • Chenglin Qi
    • 3
  • Anzhou Tang
    • 4
  1. 1.Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryLiuyang traditional Chinese Medicine hospitalLiuyangChina
  2. 2.Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of University of South ChinaHengyangChina
  3. 3.Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryFrist Affiliated Hospital Of Guangxi Medical UniversityNanningChina
  4. 4.Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck SurgeryFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical UniversityNanningChina

Personalised recommendations