A morphometric analysis of the suitability of the transverse cervical artery as a recipient artery in head and neck free flap microvascular reconstruction

  • M. Reissis
  • Dimitris Reissis
  • G. B. Bottini
  • A. Messiha
  • D. C. Davies
Original Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Gold standard recipient arteries in head and neck free flap microvascular reconstruction are currently branches of the external carotid. However, these arteries can be compromised by neck dissection or radiotherapy, resulting in ‘vessel-depleted neck’ and ‘frozen neck’ respectively. In such cases, the transverse cervical artery (TCA) may be a suitable recipient artery.

Methods

The origin, course and diameter of the TCA were determined in 46 sides of neck from 23 cadavers. The distances from the origin of the TCA to the angle of the mandible, floor of the mouth and mandibular symphysis were measured to determine the pedicle length required for free flap anastomosis.

Results

The TCA was present bilaterally in all subjects investigated and its course across the posterior triangle of the neck was constant between individuals. The mean distances from the origin of the TCA to the angle of mandible, floor of mouth and mandibular symphysis were 10.0, 9.2 and 12.6 cm, respectively. There were no significant differences in these distances between the left and right sides of the neck (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The distances from the TCA origin to the angle of the mandible and floor of the mouth were significantly longer in males than in females (p = 0.004) and correlated directly with the greater height of males compared to females (p = 0.0004). The mean diameter of the TCA measured 2 cm from its origin was 2.2 mm.

Conclusion

The TCA is a suitable and reliable recipient artery for free flap microvascular reconstruction, when branches of the external carotid artery are unavailable.

Keywords

Transverse cervical artery Head and neck reconstruction Microvascular surgery Recipient artery 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Chia HL, Wong CH, Tan BK, Tan KC, Ong YS (2011) An algorithm for recipient vessel selection in microsurgical head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstruct Microsurg 27:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology (FIPAT) (1998) Terminologica anatomica. http://terminology-anatomica.org/en. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
  3. 3.
    Ferri J, Piot B, Ruhin B, Mercier J (1997) Advantages and limitations of the fibula free flap in mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:440–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodwin WJ, Rosenberger G (1982) Venous drainage of the lateral island trapezius musculocutaneous island flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108:411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ikka L, Mihalea C, Achour NB, Khalek HA, Vacher C (2016) The origin of the dorsal scapular artery: anatomic variations and surgical applications. Surg Radiol Anat 38:1021–1027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacobson AS, Eloy JA, Park E, Roman B, Genden EM (2008) Vessel-depleted neck: techniques for achieving microvascular reconstruction. Head Neck 30:201–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones NF, Johnson JT, Shestak KC, Myers EN, Swartz WM (1996) Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck: interdisciplinary collaboration between head and neck surgeons and plastic surgeons in 305 cases. Annal Plast Surg 36:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lhuaire M, Hivelin M, Dramé M, Abrahams P, Kianmanesh R, Fontaine C, Lantieri L (2017) Determining the best recipient vessel site for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: an anatomical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:781–791CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller MJ, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Kroll SS (1993) Interposition vein grafting in head and neck reconstructive microsurgery. J Reconstruct Microsurg 9:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mizerny BR, Lessard ML, Black MJ (1995) Transverse cervical artery fasciocutaneous free flap for head and neck reconstruction: initial anatomic and dye studies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:564–568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mulholland S, Boyd JB, McCabe S, Gullane P, Rotstein L, Brown D, Yoo J (1993) Recipient vessels in head and neck microsurgery: radiation effect and vessel access. Plast Reconstruct Surg 92:628–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Grover R, Kovach SJ, Low DW, Kanchwala SK, Levin LS, Serletti JM, Wu LC (2015) Vein grafting your way out of trouble: examining the utility and efficacy of vein grafts in microsurgery. J Plast Reconstruct Aesthet Surg 68:830–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tessler O, Gilardino MS, Bartow MJ, Hilaire HS, Womac D, Dionisopoulos T, Lessard L (2017) Transverse cervical artery: consistent anatomical landmarks and clinical experience with its use as a recipient artery in complex head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstruct Surg 139:745e-751eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Urken ML, Vickery C, Weinberg H, Buchbinder D, Biller HF (1989) Geometry of the vascular pedicle in free tissue transfers to the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115:954–960CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Urken ML, Weinberg H, Buchbinder D, Moscoso JF, Lawson W, Catalano PJ, Biller HF (1994) Microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: report of 200 cases and review of complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:633–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weiglein A, Moriggl B, Schalk C, Kunzel KH, Mulller U (2005) Arteries in the posterior cervical triangle in man. Clinl Anat 18:553–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wong KK, Higgins KM, Enepekides DJ (2010) Microvascular reconstruction in the vessel-depleted neck. Curr Opinion Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 18:223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu ZF, Duan WY, Zhang EJ, Bai S, Tian Y, Tan XX, Liu FY, Sun CF (2015) Transverse cervical vessels as recipient vessels in oral and maxillofacial microsurgical reconstruction after former operations with or without radiotherapy. World J Surg Oncol 13:183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yagi S, Suyama Y, Fukuoka K, Takeuchi H, Kitano H (2016) Recipient vessel selection in head and neck reconstruction based on the type of neck dissection. Yonago Acta Med 59:159PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yazar S (2007) Selection of recipient vessels in microsurgical free tissue reconstruction of head and neck defects. Microsurg 27:588–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yazar S, Wei FC, Chen HC, Cheng MH, Huang WC, Lin CH, Tsao CK (2005) Selection of recipient vessels in double free-flap reconstruction of composite head and neck defects. Plast Reconstruct Surg 115:1553–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yu P (2004) Characteristics of the anterolateral thigh flap in a Western population and its application in head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 26:759–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yu P (2005) The transverse cervical vessels as recipient vessels for previously treated head and neck cancer patients. Plast Reconstruct Surg 115:1253–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Reissis
    • 1
  • Dimitris Reissis
    • 1
  • G. B. Bottini
    • 2
  • A. Messiha
    • 2
  • D. C. Davies
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Anatomy Unit, Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgerySt George’s HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations