Advertisement

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 40, Issue 8, pp 911–916 | Cite as

Rerouting the internal thoracic pedicle: a novel solution for maxillofacial reconstruction in vessel-depleted situations? A preliminary anatomic study

  • François Morel
  • Frédéric Crampon
  • Jérôme Adnot
  • Pierre-Yves Litzler
  • Fabrice Duparc
  • Olivier TrostEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Microsurgical reconstruction in a vessel-depleted neck is a challenge due to the lack of reliable vessels in or nearby the host site. The use of the internal thoracic pedicle (ITP) by rib section or sparring is a limited option due to the small length of the pedicle of some flaps. However, in cardiac surgery, the internal thoracic artery (ITA) is widely used for myocardial revascularization, providing a long and versatile pedicle. We aimed at determining precise anatomical bases for the use of the ITP, approached by sternotomy and rerouted in the neck, as recipient vessels for free-flap facial reconstructions.

Methods

We performed a descriptive single centre anatomical study on 20 formalin-embalmed cadavers. The ITP was harvested on both sides from the emergence of the artery under the brachiocephalic vein to its terminal division. The level reached by the ITP in the cervicofacial area was described. Distal arterial and venous diameters, pedicle length and other parameters were measured.

Results

In at least 85% of the cases, the ITP reached the mandibular angle. The mean diameter at the distal extremity for the ITA was 2.36 ± 0.15, and 2.48 ± 0.19 mm for the committing vein. The mean length of the ITP was 177.3 mm.

Conclusion

Rerouting the ITP towards the cervicofacial area could provide a reliable pedicle for free-flap reconstructions in patients with a vessel-depleted neck but it should be limited to selected patients. This novel solution for situations where current techniques are unfeasible warrants further clinical research.

Keywords

Anatomy Biometry Internal thoracic artery Internal thoracic vein Microsurgery. 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Richard Medeiros, Medical Editor, for his expert editing of the manuscript. Thank you to Mr. Bruno Belloncle of the Laboratory of Anatomy for his appreciated technical help and logistic support.

Author contributions

Protocol/project development: FM, P-YL, FD, OT. Data collection or management: FM, FD. Data analysis: FM. Manuscript writing/editing: FM, FC, JA, P-YL, FD, OT.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Acar C, Jebara VA, Portoghèse M, Fontaliran F, Dervanian P, Chachques JC, Meininger V, Carpentier A (1991) Comparative anatomy and histology of the radial artery and the internal thoracic artery. Implication for coronary artery bypass. Surg Radiol Anat 13:283–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnez ZM, Valdatta L, Tyler MP, Planinsek F (1995) Anatomy of the internal mammary veins and their use in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 48:540–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bakamjian VY (1965) A two-stage method for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with a primary pectoral skin flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 36:173–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhattacharyya N, Fried MP (2001) Benchmarks for mortality, morbidity and length of stay for head and neck surgical procedures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:127–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruce J, Drury N, Poobalan AS, Jeffrey RR, Smith WC, Chambers WA (2003) The prevalence of chronic chest and leg pain following cardiac surgery: a historical cohort study. Pain 104:265–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canale LS, Mick S, Mihaljevic T, Nair R, Bonatti J (2013) Robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Dis 5:S641–S649.  https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.10.19 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, Nosrati N, Robb GL, Chang DW (2013) Demystifying the use of internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:763–768.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829fe321 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chulay M, Brown J, Summer W (1982) Effect of postoperative immobilization after coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care Med 10:176–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark CP 3rd, Rohrich RJ, Copit S, Pittman CE, Robinson J (1997) An anatomic study of the internal mammary veins: clinical implications for free-tissue-transfer breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:400–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davierwala PM, Mohr FW (2015) Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: rationale and evidence. Int J Surg 16:133–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deo SV, Altarabsheh SE, Shah IK, Cho YH, McGraw M, Sarayyepoglu B, Medalion B, Markowitz AH, Park SJ (2015) Are two really always better than one? Results concerns and controversies in the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries for coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 16:163–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Erdek MA, Staats PS (2005) Chronic pain and thoracic surgery. Thorac Surg Clin 15:123–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2004.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ethunandan M, Cole R, Flood TR (2007) Corlett loop for microvascular reconstruction in a neck depleted of vessels. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:493–495.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.08.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farwell D, Reilly DF, Weymuller EA Jr, Greenberg DL, Staiger TO, Futran NA (2002) Predictors of perioperative complications in head and neck patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:505–511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feng LJ (1997) Recipient vessels in free-flap breast reconstruction: a study of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:405–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrier MB, Spuesens EB, Le Cessie S, Baatenburg de Jong RJ (2005) Comorbidity as a major risk factor for mortality and complications in head and neck surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:27–32.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.1.27 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Forster EL, Kramer FJ, Lucy SD, Scudds RA, Novick RJ (1994) Effect of TENS on pain, medications, and pulmonary function following coronary artery graft surgery. Chest 106:1343–1348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Galbut DL, Kurlansky PA, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, Zucker M, Ebra G (2012) Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting improves long-term survival in patients with reduced ejection fraction: a propensity-matched study with 30-year follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143:844–853.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanasono MM, Barnea Y, Skoracki RJ (2009) Microvascular surgery in the previously operated and irradiated neck. Microsurgery 29:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20560 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Head C, Sercaz JA, Abemayor E, Calcaterra TC, Rawnsley JD, Blackwell KE (2002) Microvascular reconstruction after previous neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:328–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henriquez-Pino JA, Gomes WJ, Prates JC, Buffolo E (1997) Surgical anatomy of the internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg 64:1041–1045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang N, Cunningham F, Laurito CE, Chen C (2001) Can we do better with postoperative pain management? Am J Surg 182:440–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jacobson AS, Eloy JA, Park E, Roman B, Genden EM (2008) Vessel-depleted neck: techniques for achieving microvascular reconstruction. Head Neck 30:201–207.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20676 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jacobson AS, Smith M, Urken ML (2013) Internal mammary artery and vein as recipient vessels in head and neck reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:623–628.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3062 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jansen KJ, McFadden PM (1986) Postoperative nursing management in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization with the internal mammary artery bypass. Heart Lung 15:48–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kalso E, Mennander S, Tasmuth T, Nilsson E (2001) Chronic post-sternotomy pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:935–939CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kolessov VI (1967) Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54:535–544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lachman N, Satyapal KS (1998) Morphometry of the internal thoracic arteries. Surg Radiol Anat 20:243–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meyerson J, Thelin S, Gordh T, Karlsten R (2001) The incidence of chronic post-sternotomy pain after cardiac surgery—a prospective study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:940–944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Netter FH (2012) Atlas of human anatomy, 6th edn. Elsevier, ParisGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roche NA, Houtmeyers P, Vermeersch HF, Stillaert FB, Blondeel PN (2012) The role of the internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in secondary and tertiary head and neck reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:885–892.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.01.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rowsell AR, Davies DM, Eizenberg N, Taylor GI (1984) The anatomy of the subscapular-thoracodorsal arterial system: study of 100 cadaver dissections. Br J Plast Surg 37:574–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schneider DS, McClain L, Robb PK, Rosenthal EL, Wax MK (2012) Use of internal mammary vessels in head and neck microvascular reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138:172–176.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.1150 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Serafin D (1996) Atlas of microsurgical composite tissue transplantation. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Urken ML, Cheney ML, Blakwell KE, Harris JR, Hadlock TA, Futran N (2012) Atlas of regional and free flaps for head and neck reconstruction: flap harvest and insetting. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Urken ML, Higgins KM, Lee B, Vickery C (2006) Internal mammary artery and vein: recipient vessels for free tissue transfer to the head and neck in the vessel-depleted neck. Head Neck 28:797–801.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20409 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vander Salm TJ, Chowdhary S, Okike ON, Pezzella AT, Pasque MK (1989) Internal mammary artery grafts: the shortest route to the coronary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 47:421–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wei FC, Mardini S (2016) Flaps and reconstructive surgery, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wolff KD, Hölzle F (2011) Raising of microvascular flaps: a systematic approach. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wolff KD (2017) New aspects in free flap surgery: Mini-perforator flaps and extracorporeal flap perfusion. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 118:238–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2017.06.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yazar S (2007) Selection of recipient vessels in microsurgical free tissue reconstruction of head and neck defects. Microsurgery 27:588–594.  https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20407 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • François Morel
    • 1
  • Frédéric Crampon
    • 2
  • Jérôme Adnot
    • 1
  • Pierre-Yves Litzler
    • 3
    • 4
  • Fabrice Duparc
    • 2
  • Olivier Trost
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryRouen University HospitalRouenFrance
  2. 2.Laboratory of AnatomyRouen Faculty of MedicineRouenFrance
  3. 3.Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryRouen University HospitalRouenFrance
  4. 4.French National Institute for Health (INSERM), U-1096RouenFrance
  5. 5.French National Institute for Health (INSERM), LIMICS UMR-1142RouenFrance

Personalised recommendations