Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 40, Issue 8, pp 927–933 | Cite as

Perforators of the fibular artery and suprafascial network

  • Julien GaillardEmail author
  • Laurent-Marie Bourcheix
  • Alain-Charles Masquelet
Original Article



Soft tissue defect on lower limb can result in an intractable wound. Surgeons resort in flaps to cover these injuries. Including fascia as in the case of a fasciocutaneous flap increases survey of the flap. Rising a perforator flap avoids to sacrifice a major vessel whence the nourishing perforator artery is born. We wanted to explore suprafascial distribution of the fibular skin perforator arteries supposing possible to find out a vascular axis composed of anastomoses of the fibular perforator vessels.

Materials and methods

Systematic observation was carried out on ten injected legs about the fibular perforator distribution, and especially their suprafascial course.


Dissection allowed us to raise in all specimens a large fasciocutaneous paddle including a fine arteriolar vessel connecting fibular perforators. Perforators were isolated along from the leg and we found suprafascial arteriole connecting all perforators from the fibular head to the lateral malleolus. There were a total number of 126 perforators for 10 legs. The mean length of the fibula was 32.9 cm. No perforator was located at more than 2 cm from fibular posterior border. Proximal perforators were closer to posterior fibular side than distal perforators. We found that fibular perforators clustered in the middle and upper third of the leg.


This study proves the real existence of a microvascular suprafascial axis formed by fibular perforator anastomoses and stretching over the entire length of the fibula, from the fibular head to the distal tip of the lateral malleolus. This suprafascial vascular axis could be an anatomical basis for a fasciocutaneous fibular flap.


Fibular artery Skin perforators Fasciocutaneous flap Suprafascial network Anatomy 


Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical standards

The authors declare that experiments of this research project comply with the current laws of the country.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, no financial interests in this research project or in any of the techniques or equipment used in this study.


  1. 1.
    Beppu M, Hanel DP, Johnston GH, Carmo JM, Tsai TM (1992) The osteocutaneous fibula flap: an anatomic study. J Reconstr Microsurg 8:215–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boriani F, Bruschi S, Fraccalvieri M, Cipriani R (2010) Leg perforators and leg length: an anatomic study focusing on topography and angiogenesis. Clin Anat 23:593–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carriquiry C, Aparecida Costa M, Vasconez LO (1985) An anatomic study of the septocutaneous vessels of the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:354–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH (1984) A classification of fascio-cutaneous flaps according to their patterns of vascularisation. Br J Plast Surg 37:80–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH (1994) Alternative flap nomenclature and classification, the arterial anatomy of skin flaps, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 514–522Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hallock GG (1999) Principles of fascia and fasciocutaneous flaps. In: Weinzweig J (ed) Plastic surgery secrets. Hanley and Belfus, Philadelphia, pp 419–426Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heitmann C, Khan FN, Levin LS (2003) Vasculature of the peroneal artery: an anatomic study focused on the perforator vessels. J Reconstr Microsurg 19:157–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iorio ML, Cheerharan M, Olding M (2012) A systematic review and pooled analysis of peroneal artery perforators for fibula osteocutaneous and perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 130:600–607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koshima I, Soeda S (1989) Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 42:645–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroll SS, Rosenfield L (1988) Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:561–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Masquelet A-C, Romana M, Wolf G (1992) Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:1115–1121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miyamoto S, Kayano S, Nagamatsu S, Sakuraba M (2012) Perforator anatomy of the fibula osteocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:849–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niranjan NS, Price RD, Bovilkar P (2000) Fascial feeder and perforator-based V-Y advancement flaps in the reconstruction of lower limb defects. Br J Plast Surg 53:679–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ozalp T, Masquelet AC, Begue TC (2006) Septocutaneous perforators of the peroneal artery relative to the fibula: anatomical basis of the use of pedicled fasciocutaneous flap. Surg Radiol Anat 28:54–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ponten B (1981) The fasciocutaneous flap: its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg 34:215–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ (2009) The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1529–1544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saitoh S, Hata Y, Murakami N, Seki H, Kobayashi H, Shimizu T et al (2001) The “superficial” peroneal artery: a variation in cutaneous branching from the peroneal artery, nourishing the distal third of the leg. Br J Plast Surg 54:428–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salmon M (1936) Les Arteres de la peau. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M (2008) Perforators of the lower leg: analysis of perforator locations and clinical application for pedicled perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:161–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor GI, Palmer JH (1987) The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 40:113–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor GI, Pan WR (1998) Angiosomes of the leg: anatomic study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:599–618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Dhar SC, Ashton MW (2011) The anatomical (angiosome) and clinical territories of cutaneous perforating arteries: development of the concept and designing safe flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1447–1459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tolhurst DE, Haeseker B, Zeeman RJ (1983) The development of the fasciocutaneous flap and its clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 71:597–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walton RL, Bunkis J (1984) The posterior calf fasciocutaneous free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:76–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoshimura M, Imura S, Shimamura K, Yamauchi S, Nomura S (1984) Peroneal flap for reconstruction in the extremity: preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:402–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu P, Chang EI, Hanasono MM (2011) Design of a reliable skin paddle for the fibula osteocutaneous flap: perforator anatomy revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:440–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yoshimura M, Shimada T, Hosokawa M (2011) The vasculature of the peroneal tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:917–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Anatomy, School of SurgeryAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de ParisParis cedex 05France
  2. 2.Department of orthopaedic, traumatology and reconstructive surgeryHôpital Saint-AntoineParisFrance
  3. 3.Groupe Hospitalier Paris EstAssistance Publique des Hôpitaux de ParisParisFrance
  4. 4.IFCM-Institut Français de Chirurgie de la MainParisFrance

Personalised recommendations