Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Morphology and relationships of the biceps brachii and brachialis with the musculocutaneous nerve

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Major anatomical textbooks generally state that the biceps brachii muscle (BB) is composed of long and short heads, whereas the brachialis muscle (BR) consists of a single head. However, the numbers of heads comprising the BB and the BR are very variable. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the branching patterns of the musculocutaneous nerve (MC) influence the number of heads of the BB and the BR.

Materials and methods

Morphological examinations of the BB and MC were conducted using cadavers of 22 Japanese individuals, and morphological examinations of the BR and the MC were conducted in 9 of those 22 individuals.

Results

A three-headed BB was observed in 7 of the 22 specimens (31.8%). Most of these specimens showed a Type III branch pattern (after penetrating the long head or the short head, the MC innervated the supernumerary head or communicated with the main root again). The number of BR heads was categorized into three types: Type A, two heads (superficial and deep heads, 22.2%); Type B, three or four heads (two or three superficial heads and one deep head, 44.4%); and Type C, multiple heads (33.3%). Among these categories, branches of the MC in Type A specimens were most simple.

Conclusion

A supernumerary head of the BB seemed to be present if the MC penetrates it. The BR basically consists of superficial and deep heads, and the number of superficial heads is affected by branches of the MC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koganei Y, Arai S, Shikinami S (1903) Statics of anomaly muscles. Tokyo J Med Sci 17:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adachi B (1909/1910) Beiträge zur Anatomie der Japaner. Die Statistik der Muskelvarietäten. Zeieschrift für Morphologie Anthropologie 12:261–312

    Google Scholar 

  3. Koizumi K (1934) Studies on the shoulder and brachial muscle. JNMS 5:1063–1083

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ishimi S (1950) Studies on the musculature of the upper extremities of the Japanese fetus. Report on the muscles of the brachium. Igaku Kenkyu 20:766–778

    Google Scholar 

  5. Higashi N, Sone C (1988) A study on the accessory head of the biceps brachii in man. Acta Anat Nippon 63:78–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Macalister A (1875) Observations on muscular anomalies in the human anatomy. (Third series with a catalogue of the principal muscular variations hitherto published). Trans R Irish Acad Sci 25:1–130

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leonello DT, Galley IJ, Bain GI, Carter CD (2007) Brachialis muscle anatomy. A study in cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1293–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamoto M, Hayashi S, Suzuki M, Kimata K, Asamoto K, Nakano T (2013) Brachialis muscle has three heads: consideration for implication in elbow flexion contracture. Rinshokaibou Kenkyu Kiroku 13:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kosugi K, Shibata S, Yamashita H (1992) Supernumerary head of biceps brachii and branching pattern of the musculocutaneous nerve in Japanese. Surg Radiol Anat 14:175–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Minor JM (1990) A rare variation of the median and musculocutaneous nerves in man. Arch Anat Histol Embryol 73:33–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loukas M, Aqueelah H (2005) Musculocutaneous and median nerve connections within, proximal and distal to the coracobrachialis muscle. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 64:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sunderland S (1978) The musculocutaneous nerve. In: Nerves and nerve injuries, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 796–801

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang ZX, Pho RW, Kour AK, Pereira BP (1995) The musculocutaneous nerve and its branches to the biceps and brachialis muscles. J Hand Surg Am 20:671–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fener H (1938) Der Nervus Musculocutaneus, seine Verlaufvarianten am Oberarm und deren Beziehung zur Entwicklung eines Caput Tertium Musculi Biciopitis. Z Anat 108:567–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koizumi M (1981) A morphological study on the coracobrachialis muscle (in Japanese). Acta Anat Nippon 64:18–35

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hayashi S, Fukuzawa Y, Rodríguez-Vázquez JF, Cho BH, Verdugo-López S, Murakami G, Nakano T (2011) Pleuroperitoneal canal closure and the fetal adrenal gland. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 294:633–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Niikura H, Jin ZW, Cho BH, Murakami G, Yaegashi N, Lee JK, Lee NH, Li CA (2010) Human fetal anatomy of the coccygeal attachments of the levator ani muscle. Clin Anat 23:566–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Katori Y, Yamamoto M, Asakawa S, Maki H, Rodríguez-Vázquez JF, Murakami G, Abe S (2012) Fetal developmental change in topographical relationship between the human lateral pterygoid muscle and buccal nerve. J Anat 220:384–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Abu-Hijleh MF (2005) Three-headed biceps brachii muscle associated with duplicated musculocutaneous nerve. Clin Anat 18:376–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee SH, Jeon JY, Yoon SP (2014) A combined variation of the musculocutaneous nerve associated with a supernumerary head of the biceps brachii muscle. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 73:366–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sinnatamby CS (1999) Last’s anatomy. Regional and applied, 10th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  22. Strandring S (2005) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 39th edn. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carlson BM (1994) Human embryology and developmental biology. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 196–197

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yamamoto M, Takayama T, Takata H, Shiraishi Y, Tomita N, Sakanaka K, Murakami G, Rodríguez-Vázquez JF, Abe SI (2016) Coracobrachialis muscle and the musculocutaneous nerve: a study using human embryonic sections. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 93:15–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bendersky M, Bianchi HF (2012) Double innervation of the brachialis muscle anatomic-physiological study. Surg Radiol Anat 34:865–870

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones FW (1919) Voluntary muscular movements in cases of nerve lesions. J Anat Lond 54:41–57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hollinshead WH (1958) Anatomy for surgeons, vol 3. Cassell and Co., London, p 365

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frazer EA, Hobson M, McDonald SW (2007) The distribution of the radial and musculocutaneous nerves in the brachialis muscle. Clin Anat 20:785–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cambon-Binder A, Leclercq C (2015) Anatomical study of the musculocutaneous nerve branching pattern: application for selective neurectomy in the treatment of elbow flexors spasticity. Surg Radiol Anat 37:341–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thieffry C, Chenin L, Foulon P, Havet E, Peltier J (2017) Microsurgical anatomy of branches of musculocutaneous nerve: clinical relevance for spastic elbow surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 39:773–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahito Yamamoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamamoto, M., Kojyo, U., Yanagisawa, N. et al. Morphology and relationships of the biceps brachii and brachialis with the musculocutaneous nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 40, 303–311 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1919-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1919-7

Keywords

Navigation